PythiaBasketballBETA
NBA - G League
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (37) | 105.6 | 113.2 | 218.9 | -7.6 | 35% |
| Season at home (18) | 105.1 | 113.8 | 218.9 | -8.7 | 22% |
| Season away (19) | 106.2 | 112.7 | 218.8 | -6.5 | 47% |
| Last 10 (10) | 111.1 | 113.7 | 224.8 | -2.6 | 40% |
| Last 5 (5) | 114.0 | 112.8 | 226.8 | +1.2 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (18) | 105.8 | 116.6 | 222.4 | -10.8 | 17% |
| vs Similar (12) | 109.6 | 109.1 | 218.7 | +0.5 | 67% |
| vs Weaker | no games | ||||
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (35) | 121.3 | 120.4 | 241.7 | +0.9 | 57% |
| Season at home (15) | 124.4 | 121.7 | 246.1 | +2.7 | 67% |
| Season away (20) | 119.0 | 119.4 | 238.4 | -0.5 | 50% |
| Last 10 (10) | 118.4 | 118.8 | 237.2 | -0.4 | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 125.8 | 123.4 | 249.2 | +2.4 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (4) | 125.0 | 128.2 | 253.2 | -3.2 | 25% |
| vs Similar (19) | 121.1 | 123.9 | 245.0 | -2.9 | 53% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (7) | 122.6 | 110.6 | 233.1 | +12.0 | 86% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 52.2 | 56.1 | 108.3 | -3.9 | 47% | - |
| Last 30 at home (17) | 53.6 | 58.2 | 111.8 | -4.6 | 41% | - |
| Last 30 away (13) | 50.4 | 53.3 | 103.7 | -2.9 | 54% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 53.5 | 55.6 | 109.1 | -2.1 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 52.4 | 53.2 | 105.6 | -0.8 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (18) | 51.7 | 57.9 | 109.7 | -6.2 | 33% | - |
| vs Similar (12) | 52.9 | 53.2 | 106.2 | -0.3 | 67% | - |
| vs Weaker | no games | |||||
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 60.1 | 60.6 | 120.7 | -0.4 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 at home (15) | 60.7 | 61.6 | 122.3 | -0.9 | 47% | - |
| Last 30 away (15) | 59.6 | 59.5 | 119.1 | +0.1 | 33% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 59.0 | 54.9 | 113.9 | +4.1 | 60% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 62.4 | 56.4 | 118.8 | +6.0 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (4) | 60.0 | 66.5 | 126.5 | -6.5 | 0% | - |
| vs Similar (19) | 59.0 | 60.7 | 119.7 | -1.7 | 37% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (7) | 63.3 | 56.9 | 120.1 | +6.4 | 71% | - |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 19/12/23 | Rip City Remix v Birmingham Squadron | 109-116 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/02/26 | A | Wisconsin Herd | 124-110 |
| 10/02/26 | A | Wisconsin Herd | 104-89 |
| 08/02/26 | A | Capital City Go-Go | 122-116 |
| 01/02/26 | A | Noblesville Boom | 109-125 |
| 31/01/26 | A | Noblesville Boom | 111-124 |
| 29/01/26 | H | Sioux Falls Skyforce | 115-97 |
| 25/01/26 | H | Cleveland Charge | 105-120 |
| 23/01/26 | H | Cleveland Charge | 104-113 |
| 19/01/26 | H | Greensboro Swarm | 114-116 |
| 18/01/26 | H | Motor City Cruise | 103-127 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/02/26 | A | College Park Skyhawks | 133-108 |
| 07/02/26 | A | College Park Skyhawks | 136-141 |
| 04/02/26 | A | Mexico City Capitanes | 130-119 |
| 01/02/26 | A | Mexico City Capitanes | 104-130 |
| 29/01/26 | H | Texas Legends | 126-119 |
| 28/01/26 | H | Texas Legends | 117-115 |
| 25/01/26 | A | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 112-134 |
| 23/01/26 | A | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 99-108 |
| 19/01/26 | H | Memphis Hustle | 119-109 |
| 18/01/26 | H | Memphis Hustle | 108-105 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLWWW | 35% |
| Home | LLLLW | 22% |
| Away | LLWWW | 47% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 37 | 18 | 19 |
| Win % | 35% | 22% | 47% |
| Points / game | 105.6 | 105.1 | 106.2 |
| Allowed / game | 113.2 | 113.8 | 112.7 |
| Point differential | -7.6 | -8.7 | -6.5 |
| Avg total | 218.9 | 218.9 | 218.8 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 16% | 17% | 16% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 57% (7) | 25% (4) | 100% (3) |
| Overtime % | 3% | 6% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLWLW | 57% |
| Home | WWWWW | 67% |
| Away | LLWLW | 50% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 35 | 15 | 20 |
| Win % | 57% | 67% | 50% |
| Points / game | 121.3 | 124.4 | 119.0 |
| Allowed / game | 120.4 | 121.7 | 119.4 |
| Point differential | +0.9 | +2.7 | -0.5 |
| Avg total | 241.7 | 246.1 | 238.3 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 34% | 33% | 35% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 50% (8) | 75% (4) | 25% (4) |
| Overtime % | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raptors 905 | 35 | 27 | 8 | 77% | 116.2 | 105.3 | +10.9 |
| 2 | Austin Toros Spurs | 33 | 24 | 9 | 73% | 115.2 | 109.8 | +5.4 |
| 3 | Greensboro Swarm | 34 | 24 | 10 | 71% | 124.1 | 116.6 | +7.5 |
| 4 | Osceola Magic | 32 | 22 | 10 | 69% | 120.6 | 113.4 | +7.1 |
| 5 | Stockton Kings | 32 | 21 | 11 | 66% | 117.0 | 112.1 | +4.9 |
| 6 | Cleveland Charge | 34 | 22 | 12 | 65% | 125.1 | 120.4 | +4.6 |
| 7 | Salt Lake City Stars | 37 | 22 | 15 | 59% | 126.2 | 119.6 | +6.7 |
| 8 | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 32 | 19 | 13 | 59% | 118.5 | 118.0 | +0.5 |
| 9 | Mexico City Capitanes | 34 | 20 | 14 | 59% | 113.6 | 110.5 | +3.1 |
| 10 | Iowa Wolves | 36 | 21 | 15 | 58% | 122.9 | 119.6 | +3.3 |
| 11 | Rip City Remix | 35 | 20 | 15 | 57% | 121.3 | 120.4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | Long Island Nets | 36 | 20 | 16 | 56% | 115.1 | 112.8 | +2.4 |
| 13 | South Bay Lakers | 33 | 18 | 15 | 55% | 119.7 | 115.2 | +4.5 |
| 14 | Maine Celtics | 37 | 20 | 17 | 54% | 111.7 | 112.1 | -0.4 |
| 15 | Motor City Cruise | 36 | 19 | 17 | 53% | 115.9 | 114.6 | +1.3 |
| 16 | Sioux Falls Skyforce | 36 | 19 | 17 | 53% | 118.4 | 119.3 | -0.9 |
| 17 | San Diego Clippers | 36 | 19 | 17 | 53% | 114.0 | 115.8 | -1.8 |
| 18 | Grand Rapids Gold | 33 | 17 | 16 | 52% | 120.5 | 120.8 | -0.4 |
| 19 | Noblesville Boom | 35 | 18 | 17 | 51% | 116.5 | 116.1 | +0.5 |
| 20 | Windy City Bulls | 32 | 16 | 16 | 50% | 124.0 | 124.9 | -0.9 |
| 21 | Capital City Go-Go | 34 | 15 | 19 | 44% | 110.7 | 109.5 | +1.2 |
| 22 | Delaware Blue Coats | 33 | 14 | 19 | 42% | 117.8 | 120.8 | -3.0 |
| 23 | Texas Legends | 34 | 13 | 21 | 38% | 115.2 | 116.4 | -1.2 |
| 24 | Birmingham Squadron | 37 | 13 | 24 | 35% | 105.6 | 113.2 | -7.6 |
| 25 | Memphis Hustle | 33 | 11 | 22 | 33% | 112.0 | 118.1 | -6.1 |
| 26 | Wisconsin Herd | 35 | 11 | 24 | 31% | 106.8 | 109.9 | -3.0 |
| 27 | Oklahoma City Blue | 35 | 11 | 24 | 31% | 107.9 | 115.5 | -7.6 |
| 28 | Santa Cruz Warriors | 32 | 10 | 22 | 31% | 109.6 | 115.3 | -5.7 |
| 29 | Valley Suns | 34 | 10 | 24 | 29% | 114.1 | 119.4 | -5.3 |
| 30 | College Park Skyhawks | 36 | 10 | 26 | 28% | 113.2 | 121.9 | -8.7 |
| 31 | Westchester | 35 | 7 | 28 | 20% | 105.7 | 116.8 | -11.1 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham Squadron | 17 | 22 | 40 | 24 | 103 |
| Rip City Remix | 36 | 29 | 39 | 37 | 141 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
