PythiaBasketballBETA
NBA - G League
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (26) | 123.8 | 119.8 | 243.6 | +3.9 | 62% |
| Season at home (11) | 123.0 | 119.2 | 242.2 | +3.8 | 64% |
| Season away (15) | 124.3 | 120.3 | 244.7 | +4.0 | 60% |
| Last 10 (10) | 120.8 | 115.8 | 236.6 | +5.0 | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 120.4 | 110.8 | 231.2 | +9.6 | 80% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar (12) | 122.3 | 118.1 | 240.4 | +4.2 | 67% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (18) | 121.7 | 117.6 | 239.3 | +4.1 | 61% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (27) | 112.4 | 118.2 | 230.6 | -5.7 | 33% |
| Season at home (12) | 114.7 | 118.3 | 233.0 | -3.7 | 33% |
| Season away (15) | 110.7 | 118.1 | 228.7 | -7.4 | 33% |
| Last 10 (10) | 112.9 | 121.2 | 234.1 | -8.3 | 10% |
| Last 5 (5) | 112.6 | 120.4 | 233.0 | -7.8 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (20) | 113.7 | 119.4 | 233.1 | -5.8 | 35% |
| vs Similar (10) | 108.8 | 114.7 | 223.5 | -5.9 | 40% |
| vs Weaker | no games | ||||
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 62.4 | 59.0 | 121.4 | +3.4 | 63% | - |
| Last 30 at home (13) | 60.5 | 60.8 | 121.3 | -0.4 | 54% | - |
| Last 30 away (17) | 63.9 | 57.5 | 121.4 | +6.4 | 71% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 58.3 | 56.9 | 115.2 | +1.4 | 70% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 54.2 | 55.0 | 109.2 | -0.8 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar (12) | 62.7 | 59.4 | 122.1 | +3.2 | 58% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (18) | 62.2 | 58.7 | 120.9 | +3.6 | 67% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 56.4 | 60.3 | 116.8 | -3.9 | 27% | - |
| Last 30 at home (15) | 56.0 | 61.0 | 117.0 | -5.0 | 33% | - |
| Last 30 away (15) | 56.9 | 59.7 | 116.5 | -2.8 | 20% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 57.3 | 60.9 | 118.2 | -3.6 | 10% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 57.8 | 59.0 | 116.8 | -1.2 | 20% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (20) | 57.0 | 61.3 | 118.3 | -4.2 | 25% | - |
| vs Similar (10) | 55.2 | 58.4 | 113.6 | -3.2 | 30% | - |
| vs Weaker | no games | |||||
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 19/12/25 | Memphis Hustle v Cleveland Charge | 107-118 |
| 22/03/24 | Memphis Hustle v Cleveland Charge | 106-103 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25/01/26 | A | Birmingham Squadron | 120-105 |
| 23/01/26 | A | Birmingham Squadron | 113-104 |
| 21/01/26 | A | Grand Rapids Gold | 125-105 |
| 18/01/26 | A | Grand Rapids Gold | 132-126 |
| 11/01/26 | A | Texas Legends | 112-114 |
| 10/01/26 | A | Texas Legends | 120-123 OT |
| 08/01/26 | A | Mexico City Capitanes | 119-126 |
| 03/01/26 | H | Long Island Nets | 131-126 OT |
| 31/12/25 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 115-107 |
| 28/12/25 | H | Delaware Blue Coats | 121-122 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25/01/26 | A | Iowa Wolves | 109-127 |
| 22/01/26 | A | Salt Lake City Stars | 117-116 OT |
| 19/01/26 | A | Rip City Remix | 109-119 |
| 18/01/26 | A | Rip City Remix | 105-108 |
| 15/01/26 | H | Texas Legends | 123-132 |
| 14/01/26 | H | Sioux Falls Skyforce | 107-119 |
| 07/01/26 | A | South Bay Lakers | 101-113 |
| 04/01/26 | A | South Bay Lakers | 121-125 OT |
| 01/01/26 | A | Salt Lake City Stars | 130-144 |
| 30/12/25 | H | Valley Suns | 107-109 OT |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LWWWW | 62% |
| Home | WWLWW | 64% |
| Away | LWWWW | 60% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 26 | 11 | 15 |
| Win % | 62% | 64% | 60% |
| Points / game | 123.8 | 123.0 | 124.3 |
| Allowed / game | 119.8 | 119.2 | 120.3 |
| Point differential | +3.9 | +3.8 | +4.0 |
| Avg total | 243.6 | 242.2 | 244.7 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 27% | 18% | 33% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 50% (8) | 60% (5) | 33% (3) |
| Overtime % | 8% | 9% | 7% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLLWL | 33% |
| Home | LWLLL | 33% |
| Away | LLLWL | 33% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 27 | 12 | 15 |
| Win % | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Points / game | 112.4 | 114.7 | 110.7 |
| Allowed / game | 118.2 | 118.3 | 118.1 |
| Point differential | -5.7 | -3.7 | -7.4 |
| Avg total | 230.6 | 233.0 | 228.7 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 11% | 17% | 7% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 50% (10) | 25% (4) | 67% (6) |
| Overtime % | 11% | 8% | 13% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raptors 905 | 30 | 24 | 6 | 80% | 114.9 | 103.2 | +11.7 |
| 2 | Austin Toros Spurs | 29 | 21 | 8 | 72% | 114.6 | 109.4 | +5.2 |
| 3 | Osceola Magic | 29 | 20 | 9 | 69% | 120.2 | 112.2 | +8.0 |
| 4 | Greensboro Swarm | 29 | 20 | 9 | 69% | 123.5 | 116.8 | +6.7 |
| 5 | Stockton Kings | 28 | 19 | 9 | 68% | 118.6 | 112.6 | +6.1 |
| 6 | Cleveland Charge | 26 | 16 | 10 | 62% | 123.8 | 119.8 | +3.9 |
| 7 | Salt Lake City Stars | 31 | 19 | 12 | 61% | 126.4 | 118.2 | +8.2 |
| 8 | Iowa Wolves | 30 | 18 | 12 | 60% | 123.9 | 119.4 | +4.5 |
| 9 | Maine Celtics | 30 | 18 | 12 | 60% | 111.9 | 110.9 | +0.9 |
| 10 | Mexico City Capitanes | 31 | 18 | 13 | 58% | 113.1 | 110.9 | +2.3 |
| 11 | Rip City Remix | 31 | 18 | 13 | 58% | 120.7 | 119.8 | +0.9 |
| 12 | Sioux Falls Skyforce | 30 | 17 | 13 | 57% | 118.0 | 119.6 | -1.7 |
| 13 | Grand Rapids Gold | 29 | 16 | 13 | 55% | 120.7 | 120.0 | +0.7 |
| 14 | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 29 | 16 | 13 | 55% | 118.7 | 119.2 | -0.5 |
| 15 | South Bay Lakers | 28 | 15 | 13 | 54% | 118.1 | 115.0 | +3.1 |
| 16 | Windy City Bulls | 28 | 15 | 13 | 54% | 124.2 | 123.8 | +0.4 |
| 17 | Long Island Nets | 30 | 16 | 14 | 53% | 113.7 | 112.5 | +1.2 |
| 18 | Motor City Cruise | 30 | 15 | 15 | 50% | 116.0 | 115.7 | +0.3 |
| 19 | Noblesville Boom | 29 | 14 | 15 | 48% | 116.1 | 115.9 | +0.2 |
| 20 | San Diego Clippers | 29 | 14 | 15 | 48% | 112.4 | 115.1 | -2.7 |
| 21 | Capital City Go-Go | 28 | 13 | 15 | 46% | 110.2 | 107.5 | +2.7 |
| 22 | Texas Legends | 29 | 12 | 17 | 41% | 117.0 | 117.5 | -0.5 |
| 23 | Wisconsin Herd | 30 | 11 | 19 | 37% | 108.2 | 110.1 | -1.9 |
| 24 | Delaware Blue Coats | 28 | 10 | 18 | 36% | 119.4 | 123.1 | -3.7 |
| 25 | Memphis Hustle | 27 | 9 | 18 | 33% | 112.4 | 118.2 | -5.7 |
| 26 | Santa Cruz Warriors | 28 | 9 | 19 | 32% | 109.2 | 115.1 | -5.9 |
| 27 | College Park Skyhawks | 29 | 9 | 20 | 31% | 111.5 | 119.2 | -7.7 |
| 28 | Birmingham Squadron | 33 | 10 | 23 | 30% | 104.5 | 113.6 | -9.1 |
| 29 | Valley Suns | 29 | 8 | 21 | 28% | 114.2 | 119.7 | -5.5 |
| 30 | Oklahoma City Blue | 31 | 8 | 23 | 26% | 106.1 | 115.2 | -9.1 |
| 31 | Westchester | 30 | 6 | 24 | 20% | 105.0 | 116.7 | -11.8 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleveland Charge | 36 | 36 | 30 | 29 | 131 |
| Memphis Hustle | 36 | 29 | 32 | 20 | 117 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
