PythiaBasketballBETA Best Picks Games Leagues Teams Players Pro Picks PRO Validation Research Pricing Log in

Cluj Napoca vs Gaziantep Result & Analysis

Date: Wed 16 Nov 2016
Tip-off: 18:30
Final 72-79
18-21 16-13 24-23 14-22
Position#15
Record4-0
FormWWWWW
Points / game80.5
Allowed / game71.8
vs
Position#1
Record3-1
FormLWLWW
Points / game79.8
Allowed / game71.8
EuropeFIBA Europe Cup
European cup2016
Sections

🎯 1. Model Analysis

Cluj Napoca winLost
-no forecast
Best oddsnone
Implied-
Edge-
Gaziantep winWon
-no forecast
Best oddsnone
Implied-
Edge-
No frozen forecast was made for this game before tip-off.

🏀 2. Points Analysis

Cluj NapocaLast 10 – points for & against
Opponent
Position
Result
Score
Points
Margin
Date
Competition
CSM Targu Mures
#5
W
82-69
82
69
+13
A10/10
Divizia A
Arges Pitesti
#7
L
72-73
72
73
-1
H15/10
Divizia A
Peja
#39
W
85-76
85
76
+9
H19/10
FIBA Europe Cup
CSU Sibiu
#3
W
87-84
87
84
+3
A22/10
Divizia A
Gaziantep
#1
W
73-72
73
72
+1
A26/10
FIBA Europe Cup
Olimpic Baia Mare
#11
W
91-69
91
69
+22
H29/10
Divizia A
AEK Larnaca
#34
W
65-63
65
63
+2
H02/11
FIBA Europe Cup
BC Steaua Bucuresti
#2
W
95-84
95
84
+11
A05/11
Divizia A
Peja
#39
W
99-76
99
76
+23
A09/11
FIBA Europe Cup
SCM Craiova
#9
W
80-71
80
71
+9
H13/11
Divizia A
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
22-23
17-13
20-17
23-16
17-21
16-15
21-18
18-19
22-18
15-22
19-21
29-15
26-27
15-19
19-20
27-18
20-19
16-15
18-13
19-25
26-9
18-24
27-15
20-21
17-18
14-11
24-9
10-25
30-23
20-22
21-21
24-18
21-13
30-17
24-20
24-26
19-17
15-17
28-16
18-21
156.6Avg total
82.9Scored
73.7Allowed
SplitScoredAllowedTotalMarginWin %
Season (4)80.571.8152.2+8.8100%
Season at home (2)75.069.5144.5+5.5100%
Season away (2)86.074.0160.0+12.0100%
Last 10 (10)82.973.7156.6+9.290%
Last 5 (5)86.072.6158.6+13.4100%
Last 30 games by opponent strength
vs Stronger ◀ (1)73.072.0145.0+1.0100%
vs Similar (11)71.775.6147.4-3.936%
vs Weaker (18)82.875.3158.1+7.672%
This opponent (Gaziantep) is Stronger. The matching 'vs' row is the one to weigh.
GaziantepLast 10 – points for & against
Opponent
Position
Result
Score
Points
Margin
Date
Competition
Yesilgiresun
#11
L
85-92
85
92
-7
A08/10
Basketbol Süper Ligi
Karsiyaka
#8
L
73-75 OT
73
75
-2
H15/10
Basketbol Süper Ligi
AEK Larnaca
#34
W
93-86 OT
93
86
+7
A19/10
FIBA Europe Cup
Darussafaka
#3
L
56-81
56
81
-25
A22/10
Basketbol Süper Ligi
Cluj Napoca
#15
L
72-73
72
73
-1
H26/10
FIBA Europe Cup
Galatasaray
#6
L
72-79
72
79
-7
H31/10
Basketbol Süper Ligi
Peja
#39
W
74-56
74
56
+18
H02/11
FIBA Europe Cup
Buyukcekmece
#13
L
68-73
68
73
-5
A06/11
Basketbol Süper Ligi
AEK Larnaca
#34
W
80-72
80
72
+8
H09/11
FIBA Europe Cup
Best Balikesir
#15
W
88-80 OT
88
80
+8
H12/11
Basketbol Süper Ligi
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
22-28
19-19
19-25
25-20
15-12
15-23
19-14
14-14
19-16
13-18
18-20
20-16
9-19
10-19
16-26
21-17
19-20
15-16
13-18
25-19
19-14
22-23
15-21
16-21
23-18
12-20
25-5
14-13
18-16
20-19
14-14
16-24
19-20
22-17
24-17
15-18
17-15
17-19
20-22
19-17
152.8Avg total
76.1Scored
76.7Allowed
SplitScoredAllowedTotalMarginWin %
Season (4)79.871.8151.5+8.075%
Season at home (3)75.367.0142.3+8.367%
Season away (1)93.086.0179.0+7.0100%
Last 10 (10)76.176.7152.8-0.640%
Last 5 (5)76.472.0148.4+4.460%
Last 30 games by opponent strength
vs Stronger (2)72.581.0153.5-8.50%
vs Similar (9)73.074.1147.1-1.122%
vs Weaker ◀ (19)78.370.3148.6+8.068%
This opponent (Cluj Napoca) is Weaker. The matching 'vs' row is the one to weigh.

📊 3. Team Totals

No team totals priced for this game yet.

⚖️ 4. Spread

No spread forecast for this game yet.

⏱️ 5. Quarters & Halves

Quarter by quarter

-6-3+0+3+6Q1Q1: +3.2+3.2Q1: +0.2+0.2Q2Q2: +0.1+0.1Q2: -2.8-2.8Q3Q3: +5.1+5.1Q3: +0.1+0.1Q4Q4: +0.8+0.8Q4: +0.6+0.6
Cluj NapocaGaziantep
Each team's average quarter over its last 10 games. Net is the quarter margin (above zero = the team wins that quarter on average: who starts fast, who closes); Pythia projection = the quarter means of tonight's simulation. Hover a bar for its value.
Bets by quarter and half · pick a period
Cluj NapocaLast 10 – 1st half points for & against
Opponent
Position
Result
Score
Points
Margin
Date
Competition
CSM Targu Mures
#5
W
39-36
39
36
+3
A10/10
Divizia A
Arges Pitesti
#7
L
33-36
33
36
-3
H15/10
Divizia A
Peja
#39
L
37-40
37
40
-3
H19/10
FIBA Europe Cup
CSU Sibiu
#3
L
41-46
41
46
-5
A22/10
Divizia A
Gaziantep
#1
W
36-34
36
34
+2
A26/10
FIBA Europe Cup
Olimpic Baia Mare
#11
W
44-33
44
33
+11
H29/10
Divizia A
AEK Larnaca
#34
W
31-29
31
29
+2
H02/11
FIBA Europe Cup
BC Steaua Bucuresti
#2
W
50-45
50
45
+5
A05/11
Divizia A
Peja
#39
W
51-30
51
30
+21
A09/11
FIBA Europe Cup
SCM Craiova
#9
D
34-34
34
34
+0
H13/11
Divizia A
75.9Avg total
39.6Scored
36.3Allowed
1st halfScoredAllowedTotalMarginWon the halfOver main line
Last 30 (30)38.836.174.9+2.660%-
Last 30 at home (15)36.333.369.5+3.053%-
Last 30 away (15)41.339.080.3+2.367%-
Last 10 (10)39.636.375.9+3.360%-
Last 5 (5)42.034.276.2+7.880%-
Last 30 games by opponent strength
vs Stronger ◀ (1)36.034.070.0+2.0100%-
vs Similar (11)36.036.872.8-0.845%-
vs Weaker (18)40.635.876.4+4.867%-
This opponent (Gaziantep) is Stronger. The matching 'vs' row is the one to weigh.
GaziantepLast 10 – 1st half points for & against
Opponent
Position
Result
Score
Points
Margin
Date
Competition
Yesilgiresun
#11
L
41-47
41
47
-6
A08/10
Basketbol Süper Ligi
Karsiyaka
#8
L
30-35
30
35
-5
H15/10
Basketbol Süper Ligi
AEK Larnaca
#34
L
32-34
32
34
-2
A19/10
FIBA Europe Cup
Darussafaka
#3
L
19-38
19
38
-19
A22/10
Basketbol Süper Ligi
Cluj Napoca
#15
L
34-36
34
36
-2
H26/10
FIBA Europe Cup
Galatasaray
#6
W
41-37
41
37
+4
H31/10
Basketbol Süper Ligi
Peja
#39
L
35-38
35
38
-3
H02/11
FIBA Europe Cup
Buyukcekmece
#13
W
38-35
38
35
+3
A06/11
Basketbol Süper Ligi
AEK Larnaca
#34
W
41-37
41
37
+4
H09/11
FIBA Europe Cup
Best Balikesir
#15
D
34-34
34
34
+0
H12/11
Basketbol Süper Ligi
71.6Avg total
34.5Scored
37.1Allowed
1st halfScoredAllowedTotalMarginWon the halfOver main line
Last 30 (30)35.335.871.1-0.640%-
Last 30 at home (15)36.135.171.1+1.047%-
Last 30 away (15)34.536.671.1-2.133%-
Last 10 (10)34.537.171.6-2.630%-
Last 5 (5)37.836.274.0+1.660%-
Last 30 games by opponent strength
vs Stronger (2)38.539.578.0-1.050%-
vs Similar (9)33.137.770.8-4.622%-
vs Weaker ◀ (19)35.934.670.5+1.447%-
This opponent (Cluj Napoca) is Weaker. The matching 'vs' row is the one to weigh.
1st half bets · Pythia's probability, the best price and the edge
No 1st half markets priced for this game yet.

⭐ 6. Specials 🔒 Pro

No special markets priced for this game yet.

🔥 7. Top picks for this game

No priced selection above 70% for this game yet.

🎯 8. Shooting Profile

No box scores for these teams yet: the shooting profile appears once the data provider has them.

💪 9. Team Strengths

Side by side

Not enough box scores for both teams yet (the data provider has box scores for the NBA and Europe's top competitions, not every game).

🤝 10. Games History

Head-to-head record
1
Cluj Napoca wins
0
Gaziantep wins
DateGameScore
26/10/16Gaziantep v Cluj Napoca72-73
DateH/AOpponentScore
13/11/16HSCM Craiova80-71
09/11/16APeja99-76
05/11/16ABC Steaua Bucuresti95-84
02/11/16HAEK Larnaca65-63
29/10/16HOlimpic Baia Mare91-69
26/10/16AGaziantep73-72
22/10/16ACSU Sibiu87-84
19/10/16HPeja85-76
15/10/16HArges Pitesti72-73
10/10/16ACSM Targu Mures82-69
Gazianteplast 10
DateH/AOpponentScore
12/11/16HBest Balikesir88-80 OT
09/11/16HAEK Larnaca80-72
06/11/16ABuyukcekmece68-73
02/11/16HPeja74-56
31/10/16HGalatasaray72-79
26/10/16HCluj Napoca72-73
22/10/16ADarussafaka56-81
19/10/16AAEK Larnaca93-86 OT
15/10/16HKarsiyaka73-75 OT
08/10/16AYesilgiresun85-92

📊 11. Overall Statistics

Cluj Napoca
FIBA Europe Cup 2016
Recent: 9 Wins / 1 Losses (last 10)
FormLast 5Win %
OverallWWWW100%
HomeWW100%
AwayWW100%
StatsOverallHomeAway
Games422
Win %100%100%100%
Points / game80.575.086.0
Allowed / game71.869.574.0
Point differential+8.8+5.5+12.0
Avg total152.2144.5160.0
Over main line---
Win by 10+25%0%50%
Close games (≤5 pts) won100% (2)100% (1)100% (1)
Overtime %0%0%0%
Gaziantep
FIBA Europe Cup 2016
Recent: 4 Wins / 6 Losses (last 10)
FormLast 5Win %
OverallWLWW75%
HomeLWW67%
AwayW100%
StatsOverallHomeAway
Games431
Win %75%67%100%
Points / game79.875.393.0
Allowed / game71.867.086.0
Point differential+8.0+8.3+7.0
Avg total151.5142.3179.0
Over main line---
Win by 10+25%33%0%
Close games (≤5 pts) won0% (1)0% (1)-
Overtime %25%0%100%
This competition's season before tip-off. Green = better than tonight's opponent on the same split; win-% badge green from 60%, red below 40%.

🏆 12. League Table

#TeamGPWLWin %PF/gPA/gDiff
1 Elan Bearnais330100%82.363.3+19.0
2 Nanterre440100%86.073.5+12.5
3 Cluj Napoca440100%80.571.8+8.8
4 Buyukcekmece54180%89.473.2+16.2
5 Academic54180%86.476.8+9.6
6 Minsk54180%81.075.0+6.0
7 Enisey54180%91.688.0+3.6
8 Gravelines-Dunkerque54180%80.678.6+2.0
9 Alba Fehervar43175%90.279.5+10.8
10 Gaziantep43175%79.871.8+8.0
11 Antwerp Giants43175%80.874.0+6.8
12 CSM Targu Mures43175%82.283.5-1.2
13 Skycop32167%101.377.0+24.3
14 Bonn32167%83.780.3+3.3
15 Oberwart Gunners32167%74.378.0-3.7
16 Kormend53260%85.478.8+6.6
17 Donar Groningen53260%82.276.8+5.4
18 Bnei Herzliya53260%84.279.2+5.0
19 Pardubice53260%87.084.4+2.6
20 Chalon/Saone53260%82.883.0-0.2
21 Benfica53260%76.079.4-3.4
22 Apoel BC42250%82.079.0+3.0
23 Sodertalje42250%80.884.0-3.2
24 BC Prievidza52340%75.683.0-7.4
25 Rilski Sportist52340%87.895.8-8.0
26 Belfius Mons31233%79.078.0+1.0
27 Soproni KC41325%73.586.2-12.8
28 AEK Larnaca51420%76.877.8-1.0
29 BC Steaua Bucuresti51420%77.684.8-7.2
30 Peja51420%71.884.2-12.4
31 Basic-Fit Brussels4040%76.082.2-6.2
32 FC Porto4040%74.080.5-6.5
33 Tartu Ulikool4040%69.280.8-11.5
34 Z-Mobile Prishtina5050%85.697.4-11.8
35 Siauliai4040%78.292.0-13.8
36 Limburg5050%83.097.0-14.0
37 Tallinna Kalev3030%65.087.7-22.7
Built from this season's results before tip-off (all phases of the competition). Click a column to sort. Bars: win %, points scored and allowed per game across the league, and the point differential (green +, red -).

📋 13. Box Score

TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Cluj Napoca1816241472
Gaziantep2113232279
← all games of the day
18+ · BASKETBALL ANALYTICS, NOT BETTING ADVICE

PythiaBasketball uses cookies

We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.