PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (9) | 99.1 | 100.2 | 199.3 | -1.1 | 44% |
| Season at home (5) | 103.4 | 103.8 | 207.2 | -0.4 | 60% |
| Season away (4) | 93.8 | 95.8 | 189.5 | -2.0 | 25% |
| Last 10 (10) | 98.6 | 98.5 | 197.1 | +0.1 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 98.8 | 103.4 | 202.2 | -4.6 | 0% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (3) | 110.3 | 121.0 | 231.3 | -10.7 | 33% |
| vs Similar ◀ (18) | 105.4 | 104.9 | 210.3 | +0.6 | 61% |
| vs Weaker (9) | 108.7 | 105.1 | 213.8 | +3.6 | 56% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (7) | 110.9 | 117.6 | 228.4 | -6.7 | 43% |
| Season at home (5) | 107.6 | 117.6 | 225.2 | -10.0 | 40% |
| Season away (2) | 119.0 | 117.5 | 236.5 | +1.5 | 50% |
| Last 10 (10) | 115.6 | 117.0 | 232.6 | -1.4 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 111.2 | 119.8 | 231.0 | -8.6 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (1) | 118.0 | 119.0 | 237.0 | -1.0 | 0% |
| vs Similar ◀ (23) | 116.7 | 120.9 | 237.6 | -4.3 | 35% |
| vs Weaker (6) | 115.0 | 112.0 | 227.0 | +3.0 | 67% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 53.8 | 53.8 | 107.6 | +0.0 | 43% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 55.1 | 53.4 | 108.5 | +1.6 | 50% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 52.4 | 54.1 | 106.5 | -1.8 | 36% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 48.6 | 48.5 | 97.1 | +0.1 | 30% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 49.4 | 51.8 | 101.2 | -2.4 | 0% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (3) | 57.7 | 60.0 | 117.7 | -2.3 | 33% | - |
| vs Similar ◀ (18) | 52.5 | 52.2 | 104.7 | +0.3 | 39% | - |
| vs Weaker (9) | 55.1 | 54.9 | 110.0 | +0.2 | 56% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 61.1 | 58.6 | 119.7 | +2.5 | 63% | - |
| Last 30 at home (17) | 60.9 | 59.3 | 120.2 | +1.6 | 65% | - |
| Last 30 away (13) | 61.4 | 57.7 | 119.1 | +3.7 | 62% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 59.9 | 57.9 | 117.8 | +2.0 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 61.4 | 58.6 | 120.0 | +2.8 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (1) | 75.0 | 59.0 | 134.0 | +16.0 | 100% | - |
| vs Similar ◀ (23) | 60.0 | 58.9 | 119.0 | +1.1 | 57% | - |
| vs Weaker (6) | 62.8 | 57.3 | 120.2 | +5.5 | 83% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 08/12/16 | Grand Rapids Drive v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 105-111 |
| 03/04/16 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Grand Rapids Drive | 107-106 |
| 06/03/16 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Grand Rapids Drive | 116-107 |
| 05/03/16 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Grand Rapids Drive | 118-85 |
| 18/02/16 | Grand Rapids Drive v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 100-108 |
| 23/01/16 | Grand Rapids Drive v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 98-104 |
| 26/11/15 | Grand Rapids Drive v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 93-103 |
| 01/04/15 | Grand Rapids Drive v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 101-121 |
| 08/03/15 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Grand Rapids Drive | 105-96 |
| 07/03/15 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Grand Rapids Drive | 117-108 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22/11/17 | H | Oklahoma City Blue | 112-122 |
| 19/11/17 | H | Canton Charge | 104-107 OT |
| 17/11/17 | A | Maine Red Claws | 96-99 |
| 15/11/17 | A | Osceola Magic | 91-96 |
| 12/11/17 | A | Long Island Nets | 91-93 |
| 11/11/17 | A | Westchester | 97-95 |
| 08/11/17 | H | Windy City Bulls | 103-96 |
| 05/11/17 | H | Raptors 905 | 112-109 |
| 03/11/17 | H | Erie BayHawks | 86-85 |
| 31/03/17 | H | Canton Charge | 94-83 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19/11/17 | H | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 100-134 |
| 18/11/17 | H | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 108-130 |
| 14/11/17 | A | Austin Toros Spurs | 118-119 |
| 12/11/17 | H | Salt Lake City Stars | 119-109 |
| 11/11/17 | H | Delaware Blue Coats | 111-107 |
| 07/11/17 | H | Osceola Magic | 100-108 |
| 05/11/17 | A | Memphis Hustle | 120-116 |
| 02/04/17 | A | Austin Toros Spurs | 135-120 |
| 31/03/17 | A | Oklahoma City Blue | 113-128 |
| 28/03/17 | H | Iowa Wolves | 132-99 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLLLL | 44% |
| Home | WWWLL | 60% |
| Away | WLLL | 25% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 9 | 5 | 4 |
| Win % | 44% | 60% | 25% |
| Points / game | 99.1 | 103.4 | 93.8 |
| Allowed / game | 100.2 | 103.8 | 95.8 |
| Point differential | -1.1 | -0.4 | -2.0 |
| Avg total | 199.3 | 207.2 | 189.5 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 43% (7) | 67% (3) | 25% (4) |
| Overtime % | 11% | 20% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WWLLL | 43% |
| Home | LWWLL | 40% |
| Away | WL | 50% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 7 | 5 | 2 |
| Win % | 43% | 40% | 50% |
| Points / game | 110.9 | 107.6 | 119.0 |
| Allowed / game | 117.6 | 117.6 | 117.5 |
| Point differential | -6.7 | -10.0 | +1.5 |
| Avg total | 228.4 | 225.2 | 236.5 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 14% | 20% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 67% (3) | 100% (1) | 50% (2) |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  South Bay Lakers | 7 | 6 | 1 | 86% | 121.6 | 111.1 | +10.4 |
| 2 |  Wisconsin Herd | 7 | 6 | 1 | 86% | 108.1 | 107.3 | +0.9 |
| 3 |  IPFW | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83% | 106.5 | 98.0 | +8.5 |
| 4 |  Osceola Magic | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71% | 101.7 | 97.7 | +4.0 |
| 5 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70% | 110.7 | 105.4 | +5.3 |
| 6 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 9 | 6 | 3 | 67% | 118.2 | 104.9 | +13.3 |
| 7 |  Westchester | 9 | 6 | 3 | 67% | 106.2 | 99.7 | +6.6 |
| 8 |  Maine Red Claws | 6 | 4 | 2 | 67% | 113.0 | 109.0 | +4.0 |
| 9 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62% | 124.2 | 116.6 | +7.6 |
| 10 |  San Diego Clippers | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57% | 107.9 | 110.4 | -2.6 |
| 11 |  Texas Legends | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50% | 121.3 | 121.0 | +0.3 |
| 12 |  Memphis Hustle | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50% | 115.0 | 115.3 | -0.3 |
| 13 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50% | 113.9 | 117.6 | -3.8 |
| 14 |  Long Island Nets | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50% | 93.8 | 99.8 | -6.0 |
| 15 |  Erie BayHawks | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44% | 103.3 | 100.0 | +3.3 |
| 16 | Grand Rapids Drive | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44% | 99.1 | 100.2 | -1.1 |
| 17 |  Northern Arizona Suns | 7 | 3 | 4 | 43% | 119.3 | 119.1 | +0.1 |
| 18 |  Raptors 905 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 43% | 95.3 | 100.4 | -5.1 |
| 19 | Sioux Falls Skyforce | 7 | 3 | 4 | 43% | 110.9 | 117.6 | -6.7 |
| 20 |  Greensboro Swarm | 8 | 3 | 5 | 38% | 101.5 | 101.9 | -0.4 |
| 21 |  Stockton Kings | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33% | 110.5 | 111.8 | -1.3 |
| 22 |  Canton Charge | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33% | 101.7 | 110.8 | -9.2 |
| 23 |  Windy City Bulls | 7 | 2 | 5 | 29% | 105.9 | 110.3 | -4.4 |
| 24 |  Iowa Wolves | 7 | 2 | 5 | 29% | 104.3 | 110.0 | -5.7 |
| 25 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0% | 104.6 | 115.4 | -10.8 |
| 26 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0% | 101.9 | 115.3 | -13.4 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Rapids Drive | 20 | 41 | 35 | 20 | 116 |
| Sioux Falls Skyforce | 24 | 29 | 35 | 33 | 121 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
