Penn State W will host Cleveland State W in a tightly contested NCAA Women match on 2 November 2026, a contest where neither side holds a clear edge. Penn State's recent five outings have yielded three wins and two losses, with a notable victory over USC Trojans W 85-82 at home on 25 February 2026, while a loss to Indiana W 59-93 away on 28 February 2026 shows the team can be vulnerable. Cleveland State's last five games mirror that pattern, three wins and two defeats, highlighted by a win over Middle Tennessee W 66-56 away on 26 March 2026 and a loss to Arkansas State W 53-71 away on 30 March 2026. Pythia assigns a 51% chance to Penn State and a 49% chance to Cleveland State, making the former the model favourite, and projects a 72-72 scoreline with a total of 144.2 points, suggesting a high likelihood of an overtime finish at 5%. The projected spread is 0, and the model predicts a 50% probability that the home team covers, reflecting the evenly matched nature of the matchup. The game will be decided by the teams' ability to convert the tight margins seen in their recent performances.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | no games | ||||
| Season at home | no games | ||||
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 71.9 | 82.5 | 154.4 | -10.6 | 40% |
| Last 5 (5) | 74.8 | 81.0 | 155.8 | -6.2 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (21) | 72.0 | 87.5 | 159.5 | -15.5 | 24% |
| vs Similar (9) | 79.6 | 69.0 | 148.6 | +10.6 | 67% |
| vs Weaker | no games | ||||
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | no games | ||||
| Season at home | no games | ||||
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 69.7 | 62.8 | 132.5 | +6.9 | 80% |
| Last 5 (5) | 65.8 | 67.0 | 132.8 | -1.2 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (1) | 67.0 | 61.0 | 128.0 | +6.0 | 100% |
| vs Similar (10) | 62.6 | 66.5 | 129.1 | -3.9 | 40% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (19) | 70.6 | 60.4 | 131.0 | +10.2 | 79% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 35.8 | 38.8 | 74.6 | -2.9 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 at home (15) | 35.6 | 37.2 | 72.8 | -1.6 | 47% | - |
| Last 30 away (15) | 36.1 | 40.3 | 76.4 | -4.3 | 33% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 36.0 | 38.2 | 74.2 | -2.2 | 40% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 34.0 | 39.0 | 73.0 | -5.0 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (21) | 35.3 | 41.7 | 77.0 | -6.3 | 29% | - |
| vs Similar (9) | 37.0 | 32.0 | 69.0 | +5.0 | 67% | - |
| vs Weaker | no games | |||||
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 31.4 | 27.8 | 59.2 | +3.6 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 at home (15) | 33.5 | 25.7 | 59.1 | +7.8 | 73% | - |
| Last 30 away (15) | 29.3 | 29.9 | 59.3 | -0.6 | 47% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 30.5 | 26.7 | 57.2 | +3.8 | 60% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 27.8 | 29.0 | 56.8 | -1.2 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (1) | 34.0 | 30.0 | 64.0 | +4.0 | 100% | - |
| vs Similar (10) | 26.3 | 29.9 | 56.2 | -3.6 | 40% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (19) | 33.9 | 26.6 | 60.5 | +7.4 | 68% | - |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28/02/26 | A | Indiana W | 59-93 |
| 25/02/26 | H | USC Trojans W | 85-82 |
| 21/02/26 | A | Rutgers W | 87-78 |
| 15/02/26 | H | Northwestern W | 81-71 |
| 13/02/26 | A | Maryland W | 62-81 |
| 07/02/26 | H | Michigan State W | 70-81 |
| 05/02/26 | A | Purdue W | 85-82 OT |
| 28/01/26 | H | Minnesota W | 66-87 |
| 24/01/26 | A | Oregon W | 59-89 |
| 22/01/26 | A | Washington W | 65-81 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31/03/26 | A | Arkansas State W | 53-71 |
| 26/03/26 | A | Middle Tennessee W | 66-56 |
| 23/03/26 | H | Monmouth W | 74-68 |
| 09/03/26 | A | Youngstown State W | 55-60 |
| 05/03/26 | H | Oakland W | 81-80 OT |
| 28/02/26 | H | Oakland W | 73-59 |
| 26/02/26 | A | Wright State W | 81-55 |
| 20/02/26 | H | IU Indy W | 74-45 |
| 14/02/26 | A | Robert Morris W | 57-52 |
| 12/02/26 | H | Wisc. Green Bay W | 83-82 OT |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | - | - |
| Home | - | - |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | - | - | - |
| Win % | - | - | - |
| Points / game | - | - | - |
| Allowed / game | - | - | - |
| Point differential | - | - | - |
| Avg total | - | - | - |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | - | - | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | - | - | - |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | - | - |
| Home | - | - |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | - | - | - |
| Win % | - | - | - |
| Points / game | - | - | - |
| Allowed / game | - | - | - |
| Point differential | - | - | - |
| Avg total | - | - | - |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | - | - | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | - | - | - |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 120.0 | 40.0 | +80.0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 111.0 | 38.0 | +73.0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 104.0 | 32.0 | +72.0 | |
| 4 | South Carolina State W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 112.0 | 42.0 | +70.0 |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 107.0 | 39.0 | +68.0 | |
| 6 | Detroit Titans W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 94.0 | 30.0 | +64.0 |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 112.0 | 53.0 | +59.0 | |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 95.0 | 37.0 | +58.0 | |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 103.0 | 47.0 | +56.0 | |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 82.0 | 38.0 | +44.0 | |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 80.0 | 38.0 | +42.0 | |
| 12 | East Texas A&M Lions W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 81.0 | 40.0 | +41.0 |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 89.0 | 48.0 | +41.0 | |
| 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 108.0 | 71.0 | +37.0 | |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 84.0 | 48.0 | +36.0 | |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 73.0 | 39.0 | +34.0 | |
| 17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 100.0 | 68.0 | +32.0 | |
| 18 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 72.0 | 42.0 | +30.0 | |
| 19 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 81.0 | 54.0 | +27.0 | |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 85.0 | 59.0 | +26.0 | |
| 21 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 71.0 | 47.0 | +24.0 | |
| 22 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 99.0 | 75.0 | +24.0 | |
| 23 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 77.0 | 53.0 | +24.0 | |
| 24 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 76.0 | 54.0 | +22.0 | |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 68.0 | 47.0 | +21.0 | |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 73.0 | 53.0 | +20.0 | |
| 27 | Washington W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 79.0 | 63.0 | +16.0 |
| 28 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 80.0 | 65.0 | +15.0 | |
| 29 | Stanford Cardinal W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 84.0 | 69.0 | +15.0 |
| 30 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 68.0 | 54.0 | +14.0 | |
| 31 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 65.0 | 53.0 | +12.0 | |
| 32 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 91.0 | 79.0 | +12.0 | |
| 33 | Houston Cougars W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 73.0 | 65.0 | +8.0 |
| 34 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 101.0 | 93.0 | +8.0 | |
| 35 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 71.0 | 65.0 | +6.0 | |
| 36 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 62.0 | 58.0 | +4.0 | |
| 37 | Seattle U Redhawks W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 63.0 | 62.0 | +1.0 |
| 38 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 62.0 | 63.0 | -1.0 | |
| 39 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 58.0 | 62.0 | -4.0 | |
| 40 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 65.0 | 71.0 | -6.0 | |
| 41 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 65.0 | 73.0 | -8.0 | |
| 42 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 93.0 | 101.0 | -8.0 | |
| 43 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 79.0 | 91.0 | -12.0 | |
| 44 | Texas A&M-Kingsville W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 53.0 | 65.0 | -12.0 |
| 45 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 54.0 | 68.0 | -14.0 | |
| 46 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 69.0 | 84.0 | -15.0 | |
| 47 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 65.0 | 80.0 | -15.0 | |
| 48 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 63.0 | 79.0 | -16.0 | |
| 49 | Lehigh W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 53.0 | 73.0 | -20.0 |
| 50 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 47.0 | 68.0 | -21.0 | |
| 51 | Dominican Chargers W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 54.0 | 76.0 | -22.0 |
| 52 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 53.0 | 77.0 | -24.0 | |
| 53 | St. Martin's W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 47.0 | 71.0 | -24.0 |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 75.0 | 99.0 | -24.0 | |
| 55 | Mississippi Christian W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 59.0 | 85.0 | -26.0 |
| 56 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 54.0 | 81.0 | -27.0 | |
| 57 | Shorter W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 42.0 | 72.0 | -30.0 |
| 58 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 68.0 | 100.0 | -32.0 | |
| 59 | Molloy W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 39.0 | 73.0 | -34.0 |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 48.0 | 84.0 | -36.0 | |
| 61 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 71.0 | 108.0 | -37.0 | |
| 62 | Chowan W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 48.0 | 89.0 | -41.0 |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 40.0 | 81.0 | -41.0 | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 38.0 | 80.0 | -42.0 | |
| 65 | Black Hills W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 38.0 | 82.0 | -44.0 |
| 66 | Washington Adventist W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 47.0 | 103.0 | -56.0 |
| 67 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 37.0 | 95.0 | -58.0 | |
| 68 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 53.0 | 112.0 | -59.0 | |
| 69 | Michigan-Dearborn W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 30.0 | 94.0 | -64.0 |
| 70 | Life Pacific W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 39.0 | 107.0 | -68.0 |
| 71 | Trinity College of Jacksonville W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 42.0 | 112.0 | -70.0 |
| 72 | Cleary University W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 32.0 | 104.0 | -72.0 |
| 73 | Elms College W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 38.0 | 111.0 | -73.0 |
| 74 | Baker Wildcats W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 40.0 | 120.0 | -80.0 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 15 | 19 | 17 | 61 | |
| 9 | 18 | 17 | 18 | 62 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.