Saint Josephs Hawks host Longwood on 4 November 2026 in an NCAA matchup that the Pythia model deems to favour the Hawks, with an 58% chance of victory against Longwood's 42%. The Hawks have gone 4-1 in their last five games, including a 70-58 win over Davidson and an 88-76 triumph over La Salle, while Longwood is 3-2 in its most recent five outings, highlighted by a 123-67 home win over Pfeiffer Falcons and a 90-74 victory over Radford. Longwood's season record stands at 1-0, with an average of 123.0 points scored and 67.0 points allowed per game, placing them 14th in the league. The Pythia model projects a 77-75 scoreline, totaling 151.8 points, and assigns a 5% probability that the game will extend into overtime. The Hawks' recent form suggests they will maintain their offensive rhythm, while Longwood's high-scoring debut indicates they could keep the contest close; the game will likely hinge on the Hawks' ability to sustain their recent momentum.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | no games | ||||
| Season at home | no games | ||||
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 69.6 | 65.0 | 134.6 | +4.6 | 70% |
| Last 5 (5) | 70.6 | 66.6 | 137.2 | +4.0 | 80% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (4) | 72.8 | 82.8 | 155.5 | -10.0 | 25% |
| vs Similar (17) | 70.1 | 69.5 | 139.6 | +0.6 | 59% |
| vs Weaker (7) | 75.6 | 61.9 | 137.4 | +13.7 | 100% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (1) | 123.0 | 67.0 | 190.0 | +56.0 | 100% |
| Season at home (1) | 123.0 | 67.0 | 190.0 | +56.0 | 100% |
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 84.2 | 76.4 | 160.6 | +7.8 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 93.4 | 78.8 | 172.2 | +14.6 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (4) | 70.5 | 75.0 | 145.5 | -4.5 | 25% |
| vs Similar (13) | 75.9 | 79.8 | 155.8 | -3.9 | 31% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (12) | 81.9 | 68.9 | 150.8 | +13.0 | 75% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 36.2 | 30.8 | 67.0 | +5.4 | 70% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 37.2 | 27.9 | 65.1 | +9.4 | 94% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 35.0 | 34.2 | 69.2 | +0.8 | 43% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 33.4 | 30.5 | 63.9 | +2.9 | 70% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 31.2 | 33.8 | 65.0 | -2.6 | 80% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (4) | 31.2 | 39.2 | 70.5 | -8.0 | 25% | - |
| vs Similar (17) | 35.4 | 31.5 | 66.8 | +3.9 | 65% | - |
| vs Weaker (7) | 37.6 | 25.1 | 62.7 | +12.4 | 100% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 37.2 | 32.8 | 69.9 | +4.4 | 47% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 38.6 | 28.4 | 67.1 | +10.2 | 62% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 35.5 | 37.7 | 73.2 | -2.2 | 29% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 36.2 | 33.3 | 69.5 | +2.9 | 40% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 39.0 | 32.8 | 71.8 | +6.2 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (4) | 33.5 | 35.0 | 68.5 | -1.5 | 25% | - |
| vs Similar (13) | 33.2 | 35.8 | 69.1 | -2.6 | 23% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (12) | 40.8 | 29.6 | 70.3 | +11.2 | 75% | - |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14/03/26 | A | VCU Rams | 64-77 |
| 13/03/26 | H | Davidson | 70-58 |
| 07/03/26 | H | La Salle | 88-76 |
| 05/03/26 | A | Davidson | 70-67 |
| 28/02/26 | A | Rhode Island | 61-55 |
| 26/02/26 | H | George Mason | 81-63 |
| 21/02/26 | H | Loyola Chicago | 75-61 |
| 19/02/26 | A | St. Bonaventure | 71-65 |
| 11/02/26 | H | Fordham | 64-68 |
| 07/02/26 | A | George Mason | 52-60 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/26 | H | Pfeiffer Falcons | 123-67 |
| 06/03/26 | A | UNC Asheville | 82-85 OT |
| 28/02/26 | H | Radford | 90-74 |
| 21/02/26 | A | Charleston Southern | 107-96 OT |
| 20/02/26 | A | Presbyterian | 65-72 |
| 14/02/26 | H | USC Upstate | 82-75 OT |
| 13/02/26 | H | UNC Asheville | 74-79 |
| 07/02/26 | A | Winthrop | 74-79 |
| 05/02/26 | A | Gardner Webb | 86-66 |
| 31/01/26 | H | High Point | 59-71 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | - | - |
| Home | - | - |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | - | - | - |
| Win % | - | - | - |
| Points / game | - | - | - |
| Allowed / game | - | - | - |
| Point differential | - | - | - |
| Avg total | - | - | - |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | - | - | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | - | - | - |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | W | 100% |
| Home | W | 100% |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 1 | 1 | - |
| Win % | 100% | 100% | - |
| Points / game | 123.0 | 123.0 | - |
| Allowed / game | 67.0 | 67.0 | - |
| Point differential | +56.0 | +56.0 | - |
| Avg total | 190.0 | 190.0 | - |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 100% | 100% | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | - |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 91.0 | 39.0 | +52.0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 103.0 | 59.0 | +44.0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 89.0 | 58.0 | +31.0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 82.0 | 54.0 | +28.0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 77.0 | 52.0 | +25.0 | |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 92.0 | 67.0 | +25.0 | |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 100.0 | 77.0 | +23.0 | |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 76.0 | 61.0 | +15.0 | |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 82.0 | 72.0 | +10.0 | |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 78.0 | 71.0 | +7.0 | |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 71.0 | 79.0 | -8.0 | |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 65.0 | 95.0 | -30.0 | |
| 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 55.0 | 94.0 | -39.0 |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 123.0 | 67.0 | +56.0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 72.0 | 57.0 | +15.0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 98.0 | 103.0 | -5.0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 78.0 | 87.0 | -9.0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 70.0 | 83.0 | -13.0 | |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 62.0 | 76.0 | -14.0 | |
| 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 77.0 | 100.0 | -23.0 | |
| 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 71.0 | 98.0 | -27.0 | |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 46.0 | 86.0 | -40.0 |
| Team | 1H | 2H | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 42 | 82 | |
| 28 | 45 | 73 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.