PythiaBasketballBETA
NBA - G League
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (37) | 112.2 | 109.6 | 221.8 | +2.6 | 54% |
| Season at home (18) | 113.7 | 110.4 | 224.1 | +3.2 | 56% |
| Season away (19) | 110.8 | 108.8 | 219.6 | +2.0 | 53% |
| Last 10 (10) | 110.2 | 112.4 | 222.6 | -2.2 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 116.8 | 115.8 | 232.6 | +1.0 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (2) | 89.0 | 112.0 | 201.0 | -23.0 | 0% |
| vs Similar ◀ (23) | 112.3 | 109.0 | 221.4 | +3.3 | 52% |
| vs Weaker (5) | 109.2 | 106.2 | 215.4 | +3.0 | 60% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (39) | 112.2 | 110.6 | 222.8 | +1.5 | 54% |
| Season at home (22) | 113.4 | 108.6 | 222.0 | +4.8 | 64% |
| Season away (17) | 110.6 | 113.2 | 223.8 | -2.6 | 41% |
| Last 10 (10) | 91.5 | 90.7 | 182.2 | +0.8 | 40% |
| Last 5 (5) | 86.4 | 83.2 | 169.6 | +3.2 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar ◀ (17) | 97.2 | 97.2 | 194.5 | +0.0 | 47% |
| vs Weaker (13) | 98.4 | 88.7 | 187.1 | +9.7 | 77% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 54.9 | 53.4 | 108.3 | +1.5 | 50% | - |
| Last 30 at home (13) | 53.2 | 52.4 | 105.6 | +0.8 | 46% | - |
| Last 30 away (17) | 56.1 | 54.2 | 110.3 | +1.9 | 53% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 54.7 | 55.1 | 109.8 | -0.4 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 57.8 | 54.4 | 112.2 | +3.4 | 80% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (2) | 39.5 | 61.0 | 100.5 | -21.5 | 0% | - |
| vs Similar ◀ (23) | 56.3 | 53.1 | 109.4 | +3.2 | 52% | - |
| vs Weaker (5) | 54.4 | 51.8 | 106.2 | +2.6 | 60% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 47.9 | 44.5 | 92.5 | +3.4 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 at home (17) | 50.9 | 43.4 | 94.3 | +7.5 | 88% | - |
| Last 30 away (13) | 44.1 | 46.0 | 90.1 | -1.9 | 23% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 46.0 | 43.8 | 89.8 | +2.2 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 42.2 | 38.0 | 80.2 | +4.2 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar ◀ (17) | 47.6 | 48.0 | 95.6 | -0.4 | 41% | - |
| vs Weaker (13) | 48.3 | 40.0 | 88.3 | +8.3 | 85% | - |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 28/02/25 | San Diego Clippers v IPFW | 110-100 |
| 26/02/21 | IPFW v San Diego Clippers | 109-108 |
| 15/01/19 | IPFW v San Diego Clippers | 105-90 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28/02/25 | H | IPFW | 110-100 |
| 25/02/25 | A | Iowa Wolves | 123-116 |
| 23/02/25 | A | Iowa Wolves | 117-108 |
| 22/02/25 | H | Salt Lake City Stars | 127-136 |
| 11/02/25 | A | Valley Suns | 107-119 |
| 09/02/25 | H | South Bay Lakers | 125-113 |
| 01/02/25 | A | Valley Suns | 105-124 |
| 30/01/25 | H | Santa Cruz Warriors | 102-98 |
| 28/01/25 | A | Oklahoma City Blue | 96-103 |
| 26/01/25 | A | Austin Toros Spurs | 90-107 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/25 | A | Cleveland State | 57-68 |
| 28/02/25 | A | San Diego Clippers | 100-110 |
| 28/02/25 | H | Northern Kentucky | 74-79 |
| 24/02/25 | H | Greensboro Swarm | 121-93 |
| 22/02/25 | H | Oakland | 80-66 |
| 20/02/25 | H | Maine Celtics | 97-104 |
| 15/02/25 | A | Robert Morris | 69-76 |
| 14/02/25 | A | Birmingham Squadron | 127-105 |
| 13/02/25 | A | College Park Skyhawks | 119-113 |
| 12/02/25 | A | Youngstown State | 71-93 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLWWW | 54% |
| Home | LWWLW | 56% |
| Away | LLLWW | 53% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 37 | 18 | 19 |
| Win % | 54% | 56% | 53% |
| Points / game | 112.2 | 113.7 | 110.8 |
| Allowed / game | 109.6 | 110.4 | 108.8 |
| Point differential | +2.6 | +3.2 | +2.0 |
| Avg total | 221.8 | 224.1 | 219.6 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 32% | 39% | 26% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 44% (9) | 25% (4) | 60% (5) |
| Overtime % | 11% | 11% | 11% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WWLWL | 54% |
| Home | WWLLW | 64% |
| Away | WLWWL | 41% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 39 | 22 | 17 |
| Win % | 54% | 64% | 41% |
| Points / game | 112.2 | 113.4 | 110.6 |
| Allowed / game | 110.6 | 108.6 | 113.2 |
| Point differential | +1.5 | +4.8 | -2.6 |
| Avg total | 222.8 | 222.0 | 223.8 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 26% | 36% | 12% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 44% (9) | 75% (4) | 20% (5) |
| Overtime % | 10% | 9% | 12% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 38 | 26 | 12 | 68% | 113.9 | 103.4 | +10.5 |
| 2 |  Capital City Go-Go | 37 | 25 | 12 | 68% | 115.3 | 109.7 | +5.5 |
| 3 |  Stockton Kings | 39 | 26 | 13 | 67% | 114.8 | 111.7 | +3.1 |
| 4 |  Greensboro Swarm | 40 | 26 | 14 | 65% | 107.2 | 103.7 | +3.5 |
| 5 |  Westchester | 42 | 27 | 15 | 64% | 119.0 | 115.7 | +3.2 |
| 6 | Valley Suns | 40 | 24 | 16 | 60% | 116.7 | 115.4 | +1.3 |
| 7 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 39 | 23 | 16 | 59% | 111.4 | 107.9 | +3.5 |
| 8 |  Sioux Falls Skyforce | 41 | 24 | 17 | 59% | 112.8 | 109.4 | +3.4 |
| 9 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 39 | 22 | 17 | 56% | 117.1 | 115.1 | +2.0 |
| 10 |  Maine Celtics | 41 | 23 | 18 | 56% | 110.5 | 108.2 | +2.3 |
| 11 |  College Park Skyhawks | 38 | 21 | 17 | 55% | 109.0 | 107.3 | +1.7 |
| 12 |  Grand Rapids Gold | 40 | 22 | 18 | 55% | 111.3 | 112.2 | -0.8 |
| 13 | San Diego Clippers | 37 | 20 | 17 | 54% | 112.2 | 109.6 | +2.6 |
| 14 | IPFW | 39 | 21 | 18 | 54% | 112.2 | 110.6 | +1.5 |
| 15 |  Mexico City Capitanes | 38 | 20 | 18 | 53% | 104.1 | 104.6 | -0.5 |
| 16 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 37 | 19 | 18 | 51% | 115.6 | 114.0 | +1.6 |
| 17 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 37 | 19 | 18 | 51% | 113.7 | 116.1 | -2.4 |
| 18 |  Motor City Cruise | 38 | 19 | 19 | 50% | 112.3 | 110.6 | +1.7 |
| 19 |  Memphis Hustle | 37 | 17 | 20 | 46% | 113.9 | 113.9 | -0.1 |
| 20 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 40 | 18 | 22 | 45% | 111.2 | 113.8 | -2.6 |
| 21 |  Osceola Magic | 36 | 16 | 20 | 44% | 113.4 | 113.8 | -0.4 |
| 22 |  Raptors 905 | 39 | 17 | 22 | 44% | 113.3 | 115.2 | -1.9 |
| 23 |  Cleveland Charge | 40 | 17 | 23 | 42% | 109.4 | 111.3 | -1.9 |
| 24 |  Iowa Wolves | 40 | 16 | 24 | 40% | 110.5 | 115.1 | -4.6 |
| 25 | Rip City Remix | 38 | 15 | 23 | 39% | 114.7 | 118.8 | -4.2 |
| 26 |  Windy City Bulls | 40 | 14 | 26 | 35% | 104.1 | 108.4 | -4.3 |
| 27 |  Wisconsin Herd | 40 | 14 | 26 | 35% | 104.4 | 110.8 | -6.5 |
| 28 |  Birmingham Squadron | 38 | 13 | 25 | 34% | 102.4 | 108.0 | -5.6 |
| 29 |  Texas Legends | 38 | 13 | 25 | 34% | 101.9 | 107.5 | -5.6 |
| 30 |  Long Island Nets | 39 | 13 | 26 | 33% | 113.5 | 116.1 | -2.6 |
| 31 |  South Bay Lakers | 37 | 11 | 26 | 30% | 106.5 | 109.9 | -3.5 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Diego Clippers | 32 | 25 | 26 | 35 | 118 |
| IPFW | 25 | 23 | 16 | 39 | 103 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
