UMass Women face Marshall Thundering Women in a tightly contested NCAA Women matchup on 2 November 2026, with neither side clearly ahead as the balance of power sits squarely at 50% for each. The Thundering Women arrive with an unblemished five-game stretch, winning all five of their most recent contests, including a 66-41 home victory over Illinois State, a 69-62 road win against Arkansas State, and an 82-65 home triumph over Army, while UMass Women have slipped one loss in their last five, dropping 56-67 to Toledo W at home but securing wins over Buffalo W 73-55 at home and Akron W 74-64 away. Pythia projects a 68-68 tie with a combined total of 135.9 points, assigning equal 50% probabilities to each team, and designates Marshall Thundering Women as the model favourite; the projected score reflects a perfectly balanced contest. The game carries a 5% chance of overtime, underscoring how evenly matched the squads appear.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | no games | ||||
| Season at home | no games | ||||
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 65.1 | 58.9 | 124.0 | +6.2 | 70% |
| Last 5 (5) | 66.6 | 58.0 | 124.6 | +8.6 | 80% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (2) | 58.5 | 74.5 | 133.0 | -16.0 | 0% |
| vs Similar (5) | 64.6 | 65.4 | 130.0 | -0.8 | 40% |
| vs Weaker (23) | 70.7 | 58.0 | 128.7 | +12.6 | 91% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | no games | ||||
| Season at home | no games | ||||
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 68.4 | 62.3 | 130.7 | +6.1 | 70% |
| Last 5 (5) | 71.0 | 53.4 | 124.4 | +17.6 | 100% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar (10) | 69.5 | 67.0 | 136.5 | +2.5 | 60% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (20) | 74.9 | 63.2 | 138.1 | +11.7 | 85% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 33.8 | 27.0 | 60.8 | +6.8 | 73% | - |
| Last 30 at home (15) | 34.4 | 26.7 | 61.1 | +7.7 | 73% | - |
| Last 30 away (15) | 33.1 | 27.3 | 60.5 | +5.8 | 73% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 30.2 | 25.4 | 55.6 | +4.8 | 70% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 30.6 | 25.4 | 56.0 | +5.2 | 80% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (2) | 35.5 | 34.0 | 69.5 | +1.5 | 50% | - |
| vs Similar (5) | 27.6 | 31.2 | 58.8 | -3.6 | 40% | - |
| vs Weaker (23) | 35.0 | 25.5 | 60.4 | +9.5 | 83% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 34.8 | 32.5 | 67.3 | +2.3 | 57% | - |
| Last 30 at home (15) | 36.8 | 31.9 | 68.7 | +4.9 | 67% | - |
| Last 30 away (15) | 32.8 | 33.2 | 66.0 | -0.4 | 47% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 33.5 | 32.5 | 66.0 | +1.0 | 60% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 32.4 | 27.4 | 59.8 | +5.0 | 80% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar (10) | 35.9 | 35.3 | 71.2 | +0.6 | 60% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (20) | 34.2 | 31.1 | 65.4 | +3.1 | 55% | - |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/03/26 | H | Toledo W | 56-67 |
| 07/03/26 | H | Buffalo W | 73-55 |
| 04/03/26 | A | Akron W | 74-64 |
| 28/02/26 | A | Western Michigan W | 64-48 |
| 25/02/26 | H | Kent State W | 66-56 |
| 21/02/26 | A | Central Michigan W | 69-50 |
| 18/02/26 | H | Toledo W | 52-60 |
| 14/02/26 | H | Miami (Ohio) W | 65-64 |
| 11/02/26 | A | Northern Illinois W | 75-54 |
| 08/02/26 | H | James Madison W | 57-71 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/04/26 | H | Illinois State W | 66-41 |
| 02/04/26 | A | Arkansas State W | 69-62 |
| 30/03/26 | H | Army W | 82-65 |
| 27/03/26 | A | Youngstown State W | 72-46 |
| 23/03/26 | H | UMBC Retrievers W | 66-53 |
| 06/03/26 | H | South Alabama W | 58-73 |
| 27/02/26 | H | Georgia Southern W | 72-78 OT |
| 21/02/26 | A | Georgia State W | 82-75 |
| 19/02/26 | A | Georgia Southern W | 55-76 |
| 14/02/26 | H | Arkansas State W | 62-54 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | - | - |
| Home | - | - |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | - | - | - |
| Win % | - | - | - |
| Points / game | - | - | - |
| Allowed / game | - | - | - |
| Point differential | - | - | - |
| Avg total | - | - | - |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | - | - | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | - | - | - |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | - | - |
| Home | - | - |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | - | - | - |
| Win % | - | - | - |
| Points / game | - | - | - |
| Allowed / game | - | - | - |
| Point differential | - | - | - |
| Avg total | - | - | - |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | - | - | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | - | - | - |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 120.0 | 40.0 | +80.0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 111.0 | 38.0 | +73.0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 119.0 | 47.0 | +72.0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 104.0 | 32.0 | +72.0 | |
| 5 | South Carolina State W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 112.0 | 42.0 | +70.0 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 96.0 | 27.0 | +69.0 | |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 107.0 | 39.0 | +68.0 | |
| 8 | UConn W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 100.0 | 35.0 | +65.0 |
| 9 | Detroit Titans W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 94.0 | 30.0 | +64.0 |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 84.0 | 23.0 | +61.0 | |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 102.0 | 42.0 | +60.0 | |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 112.0 | 53.0 | +59.0 | |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 95.0 | 37.0 | +58.0 | |
| 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 103.0 | 47.0 | +56.0 | |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 92.0 | 38.0 | +54.0 | |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 75.0 | 25.0 | +50.0 | |
| 17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 92.0 | 43.0 | +49.0 | |
| 18 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 82.0 | 38.0 | +44.0 | |
| 19 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 80.0 | 38.0 | +42.0 | |
| 20 | East Texas A&M Lions W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 81.0 | 40.0 | +41.0 |
| 21 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 89.0 | 48.0 | +41.0 | |
| 22 | Georgia W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 92.0 | 53.0 | +39.0 |
| 23 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 108.0 | 71.0 | +37.0 | |
| 24 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 84.0 | 48.0 | +36.0 | |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 73.0 | 39.0 | +34.0 | |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 100.0 | 68.0 | +32.0 | |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 72.0 | 42.0 | +30.0 | |
| 28 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 80.0 | 50.0 | +30.0 | |
| 29 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 81.0 | 54.0 | +27.0 | |
| 30 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 80.0 | 54.0 | +26.0 | |
| 31 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 85.0 | 59.0 | +26.0 | |
| 32 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 71.0 | 47.0 | +24.0 | |
| 33 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 99.0 | 75.0 | +24.0 | |
| 34 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 77.0 | 53.0 | +24.0 | |
| 35 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 76.0 | 54.0 | +22.0 | |
| 36 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 68.0 | 47.0 | +21.0 | |
| 37 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 73.0 | 53.0 | +20.0 | |
| 38 | Washington W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 79.0 | 63.0 | +16.0 |
| 39 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 80.0 | 65.0 | +15.0 | |
| 40 | Stanford Cardinal W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 84.0 | 69.0 | +15.0 |
| 41 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 68.0 | 54.0 | +14.0 | |
| 42 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 65.0 | 53.0 | +12.0 | |
| 43 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 91.0 | 79.0 | +12.0 | |
| 44 | Houston Cougars W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 73.0 | 65.0 | +8.0 |
| 45 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 101.0 | 93.0 | +8.0 | |
| 46 | Wake Forest W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 65.0 | 58.0 | +7.0 |
| 47 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 71.0 | 65.0 | +6.0 | |
| 48 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 62.0 | 58.0 | +4.0 | |
| 49 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 62.0 | 61.0 | +1.0 | |
| 50 | Seattle U Redhawks W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 63.0 | 62.0 | +1.0 |
| 51 | Virginia State W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 63.0 | 62.0 | +1.0 |
| 52 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 62.0 | 63.0 | -1.0 | |
| 53 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 62.0 | 63.0 | -1.0 | |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 61.0 | 62.0 | -1.0 | |
| 55 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 58.0 | 62.0 | -4.0 | |
| 56 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 65.0 | 71.0 | -6.0 | |
| 57 | South Carolina Upstate W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 58.0 | 65.0 | -7.0 |
| 58 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 65.0 | 73.0 | -8.0 | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 93.0 | 101.0 | -8.0 | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 79.0 | 91.0 | -12.0 | |
| 61 | Texas A&M-Kingsville W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 53.0 | 65.0 | -12.0 |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 54.0 | 68.0 | -14.0 | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 69.0 | 84.0 | -15.0 | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 65.0 | 80.0 | -15.0 | |
| 65 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 63.0 | 79.0 | -16.0 | |
| 66 | Lehigh W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 53.0 | 73.0 | -20.0 |
| 67 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 47.0 | 68.0 | -21.0 | |
| 68 | Dominican Chargers W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 54.0 | 76.0 | -22.0 |
| 69 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 53.0 | 77.0 | -24.0 | |
| 70 | St. Martin's W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 47.0 | 71.0 | -24.0 |
| 71 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 75.0 | 99.0 | -24.0 | |
| 72 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 54.0 | 80.0 | -26.0 | |
| 73 | Mississippi Christian W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 59.0 | 85.0 | -26.0 |
| 74 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 54.0 | 81.0 | -27.0 | |
| 75 | Shorter W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 42.0 | 72.0 | -30.0 |
| 76 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 50.0 | 80.0 | -30.0 | |
| 77 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 68.0 | 100.0 | -32.0 | |
| 78 | Molloy W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 39.0 | 73.0 | -34.0 |
| 79 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 48.0 | 84.0 | -36.0 | |
| 80 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 71.0 | 108.0 | -37.0 | |
| 81 | West Georgia W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 53.0 | 92.0 | -39.0 |
| 82 | Chowan W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 48.0 | 89.0 | -41.0 |
| 83 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 40.0 | 81.0 | -41.0 | |
| 84 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 38.0 | 80.0 | -42.0 | |
| 85 | Black Hills W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 38.0 | 82.0 | -44.0 |
| 86 | Berry Vikings W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 43.0 | 92.0 | -49.0 |
| 87 | MIT Engineers W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 25.0 | 75.0 | -50.0 |
| 88 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 38.0 | 92.0 | -54.0 | |
| 89 | Washington Adventist W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 47.0 | 103.0 | -56.0 |
| 90 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 37.0 | 95.0 | -58.0 | |
| 91 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 53.0 | 112.0 | -59.0 | |
| 92 | Montevallo Falcons W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 42.0 | 102.0 | -60.0 |
| 93 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 23.0 | 84.0 | -61.0 | |
| 94 | Michigan-Dearborn W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 30.0 | 94.0 | -64.0 |
| 95 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 35.0 | 100.0 | -65.0 | |
| 96 | Life Pacific W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 39.0 | 107.0 | -68.0 |
| 97 | Apprentice Builders W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 27.0 | 96.0 | -69.0 |
| 98 | Trinity College of Jacksonville W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 42.0 | 112.0 | -70.0 |
| 99 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 47.0 | 119.0 | -72.0 | |
| 100 | Cleary University W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 32.0 | 104.0 | -72.0 |
| 101 | Elms College W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 38.0 | 111.0 | -73.0 |
| 102 | Baker Wildcats W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 40.0 | 120.0 | -80.0 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMass W | 13 | 16 | 24 | 17 | 70 |
| 21 | 19 | 8 | 26 | 74 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.