PythiaBasketballBETA
NBA - G League
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (32) | 102.1 | 107.8 | 209.9 | -5.8 | 31% |
| Season at home (15) | 100.2 | 105.1 | 205.3 | -4.9 | 33% |
| Season away (17) | 103.7 | 110.3 | 214.0 | -6.6 | 29% |
| Last 10 (10) | 102.5 | 108.9 | 211.4 | -6.4 | 20% |
| Last 5 (5) | 101.6 | 107.2 | 208.8 | -5.6 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (17) | 98.2 | 106.4 | 204.5 | -8.2 | 29% |
| vs Similar (11) | 107.1 | 110.9 | 218.0 | -3.8 | 36% |
| vs Weaker (2) | 104.0 | 111.5 | 215.5 | -7.5 | 0% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (36) | 120.2 | 115.3 | 235.6 | +4.9 | 69% |
| Season at home (20) | 118.7 | 116.7 | 235.4 | +2.0 | 65% |
| Season away (16) | 122.1 | 113.7 | 235.8 | +8.4 | 75% |
| Last 10 (10) | 120.8 | 113.0 | 233.8 | +7.8 | 70% |
| Last 5 (5) | 120.8 | 115.8 | 236.6 | +5.0 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar (17) | 119.2 | 119.1 | 238.4 | +0.1 | 59% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (13) | 121.5 | 111.9 | 233.4 | +9.5 | 85% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 49.4 | 52.1 | 101.4 | -2.7 | 30% | - |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 52.0 | 50.9 | 102.9 | +1.1 | 50% | - |
| Last 30 away (16) | 47.1 | 53.1 | 100.1 | -6.0 | 12% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 47.5 | 51.8 | 99.3 | -4.3 | 20% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 48.8 | 49.0 | 97.8 | -0.2 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (17) | 48.4 | 51.2 | 99.5 | -2.8 | 29% | - |
| vs Similar (11) | 51.4 | 52.7 | 104.1 | -1.4 | 36% | - |
| vs Weaker (2) | 47.0 | 56.0 | 103.0 | -9.0 | 0% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 62.1 | 58.6 | 120.6 | +3.5 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 at home (19) | 59.6 | 59.8 | 119.5 | -0.2 | 53% | - |
| Last 30 away (11) | 66.3 | 56.4 | 122.6 | +9.9 | 73% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 63.2 | 59.6 | 122.8 | +3.6 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 62.6 | 60.8 | 123.4 | +1.8 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar (17) | 60.2 | 61.0 | 121.2 | -0.8 | 47% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (13) | 64.5 | 55.4 | 119.9 | +9.2 | 77% | - |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 10/02/24 | Westchester v Birmingham Squadron | 139-128 |
| 09/02/24 | Westchester v Birmingham Squadron | 105-141 |
| 05/03/21 | Westchester v Birmingham Squadron | 130-124 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/02/25 | H | College Park Skyhawks | 97-110 |
| 04/02/25 | A | Long Island Nets | 117-113 |
| 02/02/25 | A | Maine Celtics | 95-100 |
| 30/01/25 | A | Raptors 905 | 112-122 |
| 26/01/25 | H | College Park Skyhawks | 87-91 |
| 26/01/25 | H | IPFW | 88-96 |
| 24/01/25 | A | Greensboro Swarm | 118-98 |
| 22/01/25 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 104-112 |
| 19/01/25 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 98-118 |
| 16/01/25 | A | Windy City Bulls | 109-129 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/02/25 | H | Motor City Cruise | 111-115 |
| 09/02/25 | A | Cleveland Charge | 120-107 |
| 08/02/25 | A | Cleveland Charge | 136-133 OT |
| 31/01/25 | A | Osceola Magic | 111-119 |
| 28/01/25 | H | Iowa Wolves | 126-105 |
| 25/01/25 | H | Maine Celtics | 123-109 |
| 22/01/25 | A | Raptors 905 | 114-117 |
| 20/01/25 | A | Windy City Bulls | 110-105 OT |
| 19/01/25 | A | Windy City Bulls | 143-110 |
| 16/01/25 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 114-110 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLLWL | 31% |
| Home | LLLLL | 33% |
| Away | LWLLW | 29% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 32 | 15 | 17 |
| Win % | 31% | 33% | 29% |
| Points / game | 102.1 | 100.2 | 103.7 |
| Allowed / game | 107.8 | 105.1 | 110.3 |
| Point differential | -5.8 | -4.9 | -6.6 |
| Avg total | 209.9 | 205.3 | 214.0 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 16% | 20% | 12% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 62% (8) | 50% (4) | 75% (4) |
| Overtime % | 6% | 7% | 6% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLWWL | 69% |
| Home | WWWWL | 65% |
| Away | WLLWW | 75% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 36 | 20 | 16 |
| Win % | 69% | 65% | 75% |
| Points / game | 120.2 | 118.7 | 122.1 |
| Allowed / game | 115.3 | 116.7 | 113.7 |
| Point differential | +4.9 | +2.0 | +8.4 |
| Avg total | 235.6 | 235.3 | 235.8 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 33% | 25% | 44% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 54% (13) | 38% (8) | 80% (5) |
| Overtime % | 11% | 10% | 12% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Capital City Go-Go | 33 | 23 | 10 | 70% | 115.7 | 109.6 | +6.1 |
| 2 | Westchester | 36 | 25 | 11 | 69% | 120.2 | 115.3 | +4.9 |
| 3 |  Stockton Kings | 36 | 24 | 12 | 67% | 113.8 | 111.1 | +2.7 |
| 4 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 33 | 21 | 12 | 64% | 113.8 | 104.0 | +9.8 |
| 5 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 34 | 21 | 13 | 62% | 111.0 | 106.4 | +4.5 |
| 6 |  Greensboro Swarm | 34 | 21 | 13 | 62% | 106.6 | 104.9 | +1.6 |
| 7 |  College Park Skyhawks | 34 | 20 | 14 | 59% | 109.5 | 106.3 | +3.2 |
| 8 |  Sioux Falls Skyforce | 36 | 21 | 15 | 58% | 112.8 | 109.2 | +3.6 |
| 9 | Valley Suns | 36 | 21 | 15 | 58% | 116.2 | 115.5 | +0.8 |
| 10 |  Mexico City Capitanes | 35 | 20 | 15 | 57% | 106.0 | 104.0 | +2.0 |
| 11 |  Grand Rapids Gold | 36 | 20 | 16 | 56% | 111.3 | 111.6 | -0.3 |
| 12 |  IPFW | 35 | 19 | 16 | 54% | 112.3 | 111.5 | +0.8 |
| 13 |  Maine Celtics | 37 | 20 | 17 | 54% | 110.9 | 108.5 | +2.5 |
| 14 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 32 | 17 | 15 | 53% | 115.0 | 113.2 | +1.8 |
| 15 |  San Diego Clippers | 33 | 17 | 16 | 52% | 111.3 | 108.9 | +2.4 |
| 16 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 33 | 17 | 16 | 52% | 112.4 | 115.1 | -2.7 |
| 17 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 34 | 17 | 17 | 50% | 115.8 | 115.2 | +0.6 |
| 18 |  Raptors 905 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 50% | 113.8 | 114.9 | -1.1 |
| 19 |  Motor City Cruise | 34 | 16 | 18 | 47% | 112.2 | 112.8 | -0.6 |
| 20 |  Iowa Wolves | 35 | 16 | 19 | 46% | 110.7 | 114.6 | -3.9 |
| 21 |  Osceola Magic | 33 | 15 | 18 | 45% | 112.9 | 113.3 | -0.4 |
| 22 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 36 | 16 | 20 | 44% | 110.5 | 113.6 | -3.1 |
| 23 |  Memphis Hustle | 32 | 14 | 18 | 44% | 113.4 | 113.3 | +0.1 |
| 24 |  Cleveland Charge | 35 | 15 | 20 | 43% | 109.1 | 111.4 | -2.3 |
| 25 | Rip City Remix | 32 | 12 | 20 | 38% | 115.2 | 120.1 | -4.9 |
| 26 |  Texas Legends | 33 | 12 | 21 | 36% | 101.8 | 106.9 | -5.1 |
| 27 |  Wisconsin Herd | 35 | 12 | 23 | 34% | 104.3 | 110.9 | -6.6 |
| 28 |  Windy City Bulls | 35 | 11 | 24 | 31% | 104.1 | 108.3 | -4.3 |
| 29 |  South Bay Lakers | 32 | 10 | 22 | 31% | 106.4 | 109.6 | -3.2 |
| 30 | Birmingham Squadron | 32 | 10 | 22 | 31% | 102.1 | 107.8 | -5.8 |
| 31 |  Long Island Nets | 33 | 9 | 24 | 27% | 112.4 | 116.5 | -4.1 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham Squadron | 32 | 31 | 33 | 30 | 126 |
| Westchester | 55 | 17 | 33 | 14 | 119 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
