Brigham Young faces Nebraska O. on 6 November 2026 in the NCAA, with the model rating BYU as the clear favourite at 96% to win, a reflection of their 1-0 season record, 94.0 points per game and 83.0 allowed per game, the highest scoring and lowest points allowed among the two teams; Nebraska O. also stands 1-0 but averages 73.0 points per game and 65.0 allowed per game. BYU's only game was a 94-83 home victory over Ohio State, and their recent five games record is 3-2, while Nebraska O.'s five-game record is 2-3 with a 76-62 win over South Dakota Coyotes and a 73-65 win over Mid-America Christian. In the single meeting between the teams, BYU won 91-71, and the projected score for this contest is 91-71 with a projected total of 161.6 points. The home team line is 160.5, and the model gives a 53% chance of the over, with a 1% probability of overtime. The game ends with a concrete fact: BYU's 94-83 win over Ohio State remains the only result listed for the season.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (1) | 94.0 | 83.0 | 177.0 | +11.0 | 100% |
| Season at home (1) | 94.0 | 83.0 | 177.0 | +11.0 | 100% |
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 78.8 | 78.5 | 157.3 | +0.3 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 80.8 | 74.8 | 155.6 | +6.0 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (5) | 72.4 | 76.0 | 148.4 | -3.6 | 20% |
| vs Similar (12) | 77.4 | 76.1 | 153.5 | +1.3 | 58% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (13) | 93.8 | 78.8 | 172.6 | +14.9 | 85% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (1) | 73.0 | 65.0 | 138.0 | +8.0 | 100% |
| Season at home (1) | 73.0 | 65.0 | 138.0 | +8.0 | 100% |
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 74.2 | 76.7 | 150.9 | -2.5 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 64.8 | 71.6 | 136.4 | -6.8 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (7) | 70.1 | 76.6 | 146.7 | -6.4 | 29% |
| vs Similar (16) | 74.8 | 77.7 | 152.5 | -2.9 | 50% |
| vs Weaker (2) | 71.5 | 66.5 | 138.0 | +5.0 | 50% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 76.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 37.4 | 38.2 | 75.6 | -0.8 | 47% | 50% |
| Last 30 at home (18) | 38.4 | 37.8 | 76.3 | +0.6 | 56% | 44% |
| Last 30 away (12) | 35.8 | 38.8 | 74.7 | -3.0 | 33% | 58% |
| Last 10 (10) | 35.5 | 40.3 | 75.8 | -4.8 | 40% | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 38.6 | 38.4 | 77.0 | +0.2 | 60% | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (5) | 35.4 | 38.0 | 73.4 | -2.6 | 40% | 40% |
| vs Similar (12) | 32.7 | 38.8 | 71.4 | -6.1 | 17% | 33% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (13) | 42.5 | 37.8 | 80.4 | +4.7 | 77% | 69% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 76.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 37.6 | 35.5 | 73.0 | +2.1 | 57% | 37% |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 41.8 | 33.9 | 75.7 | +7.9 | 79% | 43% |
| Last 30 away (16) | 33.9 | 36.8 | 70.7 | -2.9 | 38% | 31% |
| Last 10 (10) | 37.7 | 36.5 | 74.2 | +1.2 | 60% | 40% |
| Last 5 (5) | 32.6 | 36.0 | 68.6 | -3.4 | 40% | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (7) | 34.3 | 36.0 | 70.3 | -1.7 | 43% | 29% |
| vs Similar (16) | 36.4 | 36.3 | 72.7 | +0.1 | 50% | 31% |
| vs Weaker (2) | 36.0 | 33.0 | 69.0 | +3.0 | 50% | 50% |
| Pick | Probability | Avg odds | Best 1 | Best 2 | Best 3 | Best 4 | Best 5 | Edge | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska O. over 64 | 75.7% | 1.84 | 1.85 | 1.83 | 1.83 | - | - | +25.2pp | Won |
| Brigham Young under 97.5 | 75.1% | 1.84 | 1.89 | 1.85 | 1.85 | 1.85 | 1.83 | +25.1pp | Lost |
| Nebraska O. over 62.5 | 79.5% | 1.65 | 1.72 | 1.57 | - | - | - | +24.7pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. over 64.5 | 73.3% | 1.88 | 1.94 | 1.91 | 1.91 | 1.91 | 1.84 | +24.5pp | Won |
| Brigham Young under 97 | 74.2% | 1.86 | 1.86 | 1.86 | - | - | - | +24.5pp | Lost |
| Brigham Young under 98.5 | 78.2% | 1.65 | 1.73 | 1.57 | - | - | - | +23.7pp | Lost |
| Brigham Young under 96.5 | 71.8% | 1.89 | 1.94 | 1.91 | 1.91 | 1.90 | 1.87 | +23.2pp | Lost |
| Nebraska O. over 63.5 | 76.5% | 1.78 | 1.80 | 1.78 | 1.76 | - | - | +23.1pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. over 65 | 72.4% | 1.87 | 1.87 | - | - | - | - | +22.9pp | Won |
| Brigham Young under 96 | 70.7% | 1.86 | 1.88 | 1.85 | - | - | - | +21.1pp | Lost |
| Nebraska O. over 61.5 | 82.2% | 1.48 | 1.50 | 1.47 | - | - | - | +20.2pp | Won |
| Brigham Young under 99.5 | 81.0% | 1.52 | 1.53 | 1.52 | 1.50 | - | - | +20.2pp | Lost |
| Nebraska O. over 60.5 | 84.7% | 1.42 | 1.44 | 1.43 | 1.40 | - | - | +20.1pp | Won |
| Brigham Young under 100.5 | 83.6% | 1.42 | 1.42 | - | - | - | - | +19.9pp | Lost |
| Brigham Young under 101.5 | 86.0% | 1.36 | 1.38 | 1.35 | - | - | - | +19.0pp | Lost |
| Nebraska O. over 59.5 | 86.9% | 1.31 | 1.33 | 1.29 | - | - | - | +17.0pp | Won |
| Brigham Young under 102.5 | 88.1% | 1.30 | 1.30 | - | - | - | - | +17.0pp | Lost |
| Brigham Young under 103.5 | 90.0% | 1.26 | 1.26 | - | - | - | - | +16.2pp | Lost |
| Nebraska O. over 58.5 | 88.9% | 1.27 | 1.27 | - | - | - | - | +16.1pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. over 57.5 | 90.7% | 1.21 | 1.25 | 1.18 | - | - | - | +14.4pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. over 56.5 | 92.3% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +13.4pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. over 54.5 | 94.7% | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.10 | - | - | - | +10.7pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. over 55.5 | 93.6% | 1.11 | 1.11 | - | - | - | - | +9.2pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. over 52.5 | 96.5% | 1.06 | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | +8.2pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. over 53.5 | 95.7% | 1.06 | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | +7.8pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. over 50.5 | 97.8% | 1.03 | 1.03 | - | - | - | - | +7.3pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. over 51.5 | 97.2% | 1.03 | 1.03 | - | - | - | - | +7.0pp | Won |
| Over 135.5 | 94.7% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +2.5pp | Won |
| Over 140.5 | 90.5% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +1.1pp | Won |
| Under 185.5 | 93.0% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +0.8pp | Won |
| Over 153 | 70.6% | 1.33 | 1.33 | - | - | - | - | +0.6pp | Won |
| Brigham Young over 75.5 | 93.9% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +0.2pp | Won |
| Over 152.5 | 71.3% | 1.30 | 1.30 | - | - | - | - | -0.2pp | Won |
| Over 150.5 | 75.3% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | -0.8pp | Won |
| Over 145.5 | 84.1% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | -1.0pp | Won |
| Brigham Young over 76.5 | 92.6% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | -1.1pp | Won |
| Brigham Young over 77.5 | 91.1% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | -1.1pp | Won |
| Under 180.5 | 87.9% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | -1.5pp | Won |
| Brigham Young over 78.5 | 89.4% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | -2.9pp | Won |
| Under 175.5 | 80.6% | 1.11 | 1.11 | - | - | - | - | -3.2pp | Won |
| Brigham Young over 79.5 | 87.4% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | -3.3pp | Won |
| Under 170.5 | 71.1% | 1.25 | 1.25 | - | - | - | - | -3.7pp | Lost |
| Brigham Young over 80.5 | 85.2% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | -5.5pp | Won |
| Brigham Young over 81.5 | 82.8% | 1.05 | 1.05 | - | - | - | - | -6.2pp | Won |
| Brigham Young over 82.5 | 80.1% | 1.05 | 1.05 | - | - | - | - | -8.9pp | Won |
| Brigham Young over 83.5 | 77.1% | 1.07 | 1.07 | - | - | - | - | -10.0pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. under 80.5 | 83.5% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | -10.2pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. under 79.5 | 81.0% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | -10.5pp | Won |
| Brigham Young over 84.5 | 74.0% | 1.08 | 1.08 | - | - | - | - | -12.7pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. under 78.5 | 78.2% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | -12.9pp | Won |
| Brigham Young over 85.5 | 70.6% | 1.11 | 1.11 | - | - | - | - | -13.3pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. under 77.5 | 75.2% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | -14.4pp | Won |
| Brigham Young -11.5 | 77.5% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | -15.3pp | Won |
| Nebraska O. under 76.5 | 72.0% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | -17.4pp | Won |
| Brigham Young -12.5 | 74.8% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | -17.5pp | Won |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/26 | H | Ohio State | 94-83 |
| 19/03/26 | H | Texas | 71-79 |
| 12/03/26 | A | Houston | 66-73 |
| 11/03/26 | A | West Virginia | 68-48 |
| 10/03/26 | H | Kansas State | 105-91 |
| 08/03/26 | H | Texas Tech | 82-76 |
| 04/03/26 | A | Cincinnati | 68-90 |
| 28/02/26 | A | West Virginia | 71-79 |
| 25/02/26 | H | UCF Knights | 84-97 |
| 22/02/26 | H | Iowa State | 79-69 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/26 | H | Mid-America Christian | 73-65 |
| 08/03/26 | A | North Dakota St | 50-74 |
| 07/03/26 | A | South Dakota Coyotes | 76-62 |
| 01/03/26 | A | St. Thomas (Minn.) | 53-68 |
| 26/02/26 | A | South Dakota Coyotes | 72-89 |
| 19/02/26 | H | Oral Roberts | 80-71 |
| 15/02/26 | H | Denver | 83-76 |
| 13/02/26 | H | St. Thomas (Minn.) | 98-94 |
| 07/02/26 | A | North Dakota St | 84-92 |
| 06/02/26 | A | North Dakota | 73-76 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | W | 100% |
| Home | W | 100% |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 1 | 1 | - |
| Win % | 100% | 100% | - |
| Points / game | 94.0 | 94.0 | - |
| Allowed / game | 83.0 | 83.0 | - |
| Point differential | +11.0 | +11.0 | - |
| Avg total | 177.0 | 177.0 | - |
| Over 162.5 | 100% | 100% | - |
| Win by 10+ | 100% | 100% | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | - |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | W | 100% |
| Home | W | 100% |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 1 | 1 | - |
| Win % | 100% | 100% | - |
| Points / game | 73.0 | 73.0 | - |
| Allowed / game | 65.0 | 65.0 | - |
| Point differential | +8.0 | +8.0 | - |
| Avg total | 138.0 | 138.0 | - |
| Over 162.5 | 0% | 0% | - |
| Win by 10+ | 0% | 0% | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | - |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 102.0 | 56.5 | +45.5 | |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 91.0 | 49.5 | +41.5 | |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 98.0 | 59.0 | +39.0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 94.0 | 55.0 | +39.0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 94.0 | 59.0 | +35.0 | |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 91.0 | 60.0 | +31.0 | |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 95.0 | 65.0 | +30.0 | |
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 76.0 | 50.0 | +26.0 | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 80.0 | 58.5 | +21.5 | |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 94.0 | 83.0 | +11.0 | |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 75.0 | 65.0 | +10.0 | |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 91.5 | 85.0 | +6.5 | |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 66.5 | 60.0 | +6.5 | |
| 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 79.5 | 68.5 | +11.0 | |
| 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 89.5 | 84.0 | +5.5 | |
| 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 66.0 | 68.0 | -2.0 |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 73.0 | 65.0 | +8.0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 68.0 | 66.0 | +2.0 | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 94.5 | 79.5 | +15.0 | |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 74.5 | 77.0 | -2.5 | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 80.5 | 84.5 | -4.0 | |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 77.0 | 82.0 | -5.0 | |
| 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 68.0 | 75.0 | -7.0 | |
| 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 55.0 | 85.0 | -30.0 | |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 50.0 | 85.0 | -35.0 |
| Team | 1H | 2H | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
| 56 | 52 | 108 | |
| 30 | 37 | 67 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.