PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (12) | 103.6 | 111.2 | 214.8 | -7.6 | 42% |
| Season at home (4) | 109.8 | 119.8 | 229.5 | -10.0 | 25% |
| Season away (8) | 100.5 | 106.9 | 207.4 | -6.4 | 50% |
| Last 10 (10) | 105.5 | 110.6 | 216.1 | -5.1 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 106.4 | 110.6 | 217.0 | -4.2 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (6) | 98.7 | 104.5 | 203.2 | -5.8 | 33% |
| vs Similar (19) | 107.1 | 109.7 | 216.8 | -2.6 | 53% |
| vs Weaker (5) | 115.2 | 111.6 | 226.8 | +3.6 | 60% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (16) | 97.6 | 100.7 | 198.3 | -3.1 | 44% |
| Season at home (9) | 101.1 | 99.8 | 200.9 | +1.3 | 56% |
| Season away (7) | 93.1 | 101.9 | 195.0 | -8.7 | 29% |
| Last 10 (10) | 98.2 | 103.7 | 201.9 | -5.5 | 30% |
| Last 5 (5) | 94.2 | 93.8 | 188.0 | +0.4 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (2) | 104.5 | 124.0 | 228.5 | -19.5 | 0% |
| vs Similar (20) | 101.2 | 103.6 | 204.8 | -2.3 | 55% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (8) | 106.2 | 104.4 | 210.6 | +1.9 | 38% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 52.8 | 54.8 | 107.6 | -2.0 | 43% | - |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 54.3 | 56.4 | 110.6 | -2.1 | 36% | - |
| Last 30 away (16) | 51.5 | 53.5 | 105.0 | -2.0 | 50% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 54.1 | 54.3 | 108.4 | -0.2 | 60% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 54.2 | 54.2 | 108.4 | +0.0 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (6) | 47.5 | 55.8 | 103.3 | -8.3 | 33% | - |
| vs Similar (19) | 54.1 | 54.1 | 108.2 | +0.1 | 53% | - |
| vs Weaker (5) | 54.2 | 56.6 | 110.8 | -2.4 | 20% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 51.5 | 51.9 | 103.4 | -0.4 | 47% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 52.6 | 49.4 | 102.0 | +3.2 | 62% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 50.2 | 54.9 | 105.1 | -4.6 | 29% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 48.2 | 50.2 | 98.4 | -2.0 | 30% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 46.2 | 46.6 | 92.8 | -0.4 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (2) | 56.5 | 57.5 | 114.0 | -1.0 | 50% | - |
| vs Similar (20) | 50.6 | 50.5 | 101.1 | +0.1 | 45% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (8) | 52.5 | 54.2 | 106.8 | -1.8 | 50% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 19/11/17 | Grand Rapids Drive v Canton Charge | 104-107 OT |
| 31/03/17 | Grand Rapids Drive v Canton Charge | 94-83 |
| 04/02/17 | Canton Charge v Grand Rapids Drive | 107-114 |
| 19/11/16 | Canton Charge v Grand Rapids Drive | 121-127 OT |
| 12/11/16 | Grand Rapids Drive v Canton Charge | 134-111 |
| 25/03/16 | Canton Charge v Grand Rapids Drive | 114-100 |
| 25/02/16 | Canton Charge v Grand Rapids Drive | 119-109 |
| 10/02/16 | Canton Charge v Grand Rapids Drive | 106-89 |
| 14/01/16 | Grand Rapids Drive v Canton Charge | 108-113 |
| 24/12/15 | Grand Rapids Drive v Canton Charge | 113-111 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/12/17 | H | Delaware Blue Coats | 120-113 |
| 07/12/17 | A | Texas Legends | 110-107 |
| 05/12/17 | A | Salt Lake City Stars | 87-94 |
| 02/12/17 | H | Long Island Nets | 101-126 |
| 29/11/17 | A | Greensboro Swarm | 114-113 |
| 26/11/17 | H | Long Island Nets | 101-116 |
| 21/11/17 | A | IPFW | 78-91 |
| 19/11/17 | A | Grand Rapids Drive | 107-104 OT |
| 16/11/17 | H | Memphis Hustle | 117-124 |
| 12/11/17 | A | Maine Red Claws | 120-118 OT |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/12/17 | H | Raptors 905 | 101-87 |
| 05/12/17 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 86-91 |
| 02/12/17 | A | Erie BayHawks | 108-105 OT |
| 01/12/17 | H | Osceola Magic | 90-80 |
| 28/11/17 | A | Long Island Nets | 86-106 |
| 26/11/17 | A | Raptors 905 | 83-119 |
| 25/11/17 | H | Sioux Falls Skyforce | 116-121 |
| 22/11/17 | H | Oklahoma City Blue | 112-122 |
| 19/11/17 | H | Canton Charge | 104-107 OT |
| 17/11/17 | A | Maine Red Claws | 96-99 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLLWW | 42% |
| Home | LLLW | 25% |
| Away | WLWLW | 50% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 12 | 4 | 8 |
| Win % | 42% | 25% | 50% |
| Points / game | 103.6 | 109.8 | 100.5 |
| Allowed / game | 111.2 | 119.8 | 106.9 |
| Point differential | -7.6 | -10.0 | -6.4 |
| Avg total | 214.8 | 229.5 | 207.4 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 80% (5) | - | 80% (5) |
| Overtime % | 17% | 0% | 25% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LWWLW | 44% |
| Home | LLWLW | 56% |
| Away | LLLLW | 29% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 16 | 9 | 7 |
| Win % | 44% | 56% | 29% |
| Points / game | 97.6 | 101.1 | 93.1 |
| Allowed / game | 100.7 | 99.8 | 101.9 |
| Point differential | -3.1 | +1.3 | -8.7 |
| Avg total | 198.3 | 200.9 | 195.0 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 12% | 22% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 40% (10) | 40% (5) | 40% (5) |
| Overtime % | 12% | 11% | 14% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  South Bay Lakers | 14 | 11 | 3 | 79% | 120.1 | 114.3 | +5.8 |
| 2 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 17 | 13 | 4 | 76% | 121.8 | 112.9 | +8.9 |
| 3 |  IPFW | 14 | 10 | 4 | 71% | 109.6 | 104.7 | +4.9 |
| 4 |  Westchester | 17 | 12 | 5 | 71% | 108.4 | 101.6 | +6.8 |
| 5 |  Long Island Nets | 15 | 10 | 5 | 67% | 101.3 | 100.1 | +1.2 |
| 6 |  Osceola Magic | 15 | 10 | 5 | 67% | 102.2 | 101.9 | +0.3 |
| 7 |  Wisconsin Herd | 14 | 9 | 5 | 64% | 108.6 | 109.6 | -1.1 |
| 8 |  San Diego Clippers | 15 | 9 | 6 | 60% | 107.6 | 106.9 | +0.7 |
| 9 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 17 | 10 | 7 | 59% | 114.4 | 108.4 | +6.0 |
| 10 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 16 | 9 | 7 | 56% | 107.6 | 105.2 | +2.4 |
| 11 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 15 | 8 | 7 | 53% | 111.2 | 111.0 | +0.2 |
| 12 |  Maine Red Claws | 16 | 8 | 8 | 50% | 111.9 | 112.8 | -0.9 |
| 13 |  Texas Legends | 15 | 7 | 8 | 47% | 118.1 | 116.5 | +1.6 |
| 14 |  Sioux Falls Skyforce | 13 | 6 | 7 | 46% | 112.6 | 116.2 | -3.5 |
| 15 | Grand Rapids Drive | 16 | 7 | 9 | 44% | 97.6 | 100.7 | -3.1 |
| 16 |  Memphis Hustle | 14 | 6 | 8 | 43% | 109.9 | 110.3 | -0.4 |
| 17 | Canton Charge | 12 | 5 | 7 | 42% | 103.6 | 111.2 | -7.6 |
| 18 |  Northern Arizona Suns | 15 | 6 | 9 | 40% | 120.9 | 117.7 | +3.2 |
| 19 |  Windy City Bulls | 13 | 5 | 8 | 38% | 109.3 | 108.3 | +1.0 |
| 20 |  Stockton Kings | 14 | 5 | 9 | 36% | 110.9 | 111.4 | -0.5 |
| 21 |  Erie BayHawks | 15 | 5 | 10 | 33% | 103.0 | 106.3 | -3.3 |
| 22 |  Greensboro Swarm | 15 | 5 | 10 | 33% | 104.5 | 109.5 | -5.1 |
| 23 |  Iowa Wolves | 12 | 4 | 8 | 33% | 103.8 | 110.7 | -6.9 |
| 24 |  Raptors 905 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 31% | 96.5 | 99.9 | -3.4 |
| 25 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 15 | 4 | 11 | 27% | 106.3 | 111.0 | -4.7 |
| 26 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 15 | 3 | 12 | 20% | 100.0 | 108.4 | -8.4 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canton Charge | 29 | 30 | 32 | 22 | 113 |
| Grand Rapids Drive | 22 | 23 | 26 | 31 | 102 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
