Clemson W will host Radford W on 2 November 2026 in the NCAA Women competition, with the Pythia model designating Clemson as the clear favourite at 83% versus 17% for Radford, a reflection of Clemson's superior season performance and recent form. Clemson's last five outings include two victories and three defeats, while Radford's recent five feature three wins and two losses, indicating a more balanced run for the Highlanders. Clemson's last three results show a loss to USC Trojans W 67-71 at home on 21 March 2026, a loss to Duke W 46-60 away on 6 March 2026, and a win over Virginia Cavaliers W 63-50 away on 5 March 2026, whereas Radford's recent games include a loss to Arkansas State W 52-83 away on 23 March 2026, a win over Morehead State W 77-58 at home on 20 March 2026, and a loss to High Point W 67-71 away on 8 March 2026. In their only previous meeting, Clemson beat Radford 74-48 on 8 December 2024. The projected score is 72-61 for Clemson, with a total of 132.6 points, and the model gives a 3% chance of overtime. Clemson's 72 points will likely secure the win.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | no games | ||||
| Season at home | no games | ||||
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 60.7 | 62.5 | 123.2 | -1.8 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 59.2 | 65.8 | 125.0 | -6.6 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (5) | 52.2 | 60.2 | 112.4 | -8.0 | 20% |
| vs Similar ◀ (12) | 64.9 | 65.8 | 130.7 | -0.8 | 50% |
| vs Weaker (13) | 77.5 | 54.2 | 131.8 | +23.3 | 92% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | no games | ||||
| Season at home | no games | ||||
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 74.0 | 63.0 | 137.0 | +11.0 | 70% |
| Last 5 (5) | 72.6 | 67.4 | 140.0 | +5.2 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (7) | 65.4 | 70.6 | 136.0 | -5.1 | 43% |
| vs Similar ◀ (4) | 68.8 | 75.2 | 144.0 | -6.5 | 25% |
| vs Weaker (18) | 69.6 | 55.3 | 124.8 | +14.3 | 83% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 32.5 | 29.2 | 61.6 | +3.3 | 57% | - |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 35.0 | 28.4 | 63.4 | +6.6 | 64% | - |
| Last 30 away (16) | 30.2 | 29.8 | 60.1 | +0.4 | 50% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 28.4 | 30.4 | 58.8 | -2.0 | 60% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 27.6 | 34.2 | 61.8 | -6.6 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (5) | 23.2 | 31.4 | 54.6 | -8.2 | 20% | - |
| vs Similar ◀ (12) | 29.3 | 32.6 | 61.9 | -3.3 | 42% | - |
| vs Weaker (13) | 38.9 | 25.2 | 64.1 | +13.8 | 85% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 33.1 | 27.9 | 61.0 | +5.2 | 70% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 35.1 | 28.1 | 63.2 | +7.1 | 75% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 30.8 | 27.7 | 58.5 | +3.1 | 64% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 37.5 | 30.4 | 67.9 | +7.1 | 80% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 37.4 | 30.4 | 67.8 | +7.0 | 80% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (7) | 33.0 | 29.0 | 62.0 | +4.0 | 57% | - |
| vs Similar ◀ (4) | 23.8 | 33.8 | 57.5 | -10.0 | 0% | - |
| vs Weaker (18) | 34.6 | 25.8 | 60.4 | +8.8 | 89% | - |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21/03/26 | H | USC Trojans W | 67-71 OT |
| 06/03/26 | A | Duke W | 46-60 |
| 05/03/26 | A | Virginia Cavaliers W | 63-50 |
| 01/03/26 | A | Stanford Cardinal W | 50-85 |
| 27/02/26 | A | California Golden Bears W | 70-63 |
| 22/02/26 | H | Duke W | 53-51 |
| 15/02/26 | A | Syracuse W | 64-68 |
| 13/02/26 | H | Georgia Tech W | 67-65 OT |
| 08/02/26 | H | Boston College W | 83-59 |
| 05/02/26 | A | North Carolina W | 44-53 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24/03/26 | A | Arkansas State W | 52-83 |
| 20/03/26 | H | Morehead State W | 77-58 |
| 08/03/26 | A | High Point W | 67-71 |
| 08/03/26 | H | Longwood W | 81-58 |
| 05/03/26 | H | Charleston Southern Buccaneers W | 86-67 |
| 28/02/26 | A | Gardner Webb W | 65-59 |
| 26/02/26 | H | Presbyterian College W | 95-54 |
| 21/02/26 | A | Charleston Southern Buccaneers W | 92-78 |
| 19/02/26 | H | South Carolina Upstate W | 52-57 |
| 11/02/26 | A | UNC Asheville W | 73-45 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | - | - |
| Home | - | - |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | - | - | - |
| Win % | - | - | - |
| Points / game | - | - | - |
| Allowed / game | - | - | - |
| Point differential | - | - | - |
| Avg total | - | - | - |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | - | - | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | - | - | - |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | - | - |
| Home | - | - |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | - | - | - |
| Win % | - | - | - |
| Points / game | - | - | - |
| Allowed / game | - | - | - |
| Point differential | - | - | - |
| Avg total | - | - | - |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | - | - | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | - | - | - |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 104.0 | 32.0 | +72.0 | |
| 2 | Detroit Titans W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 94.0 | 30.0 | +64.0 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 103.0 | 47.0 | +56.0 | |
| 4 | East Texas A&M Lions W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 81.0 | 40.0 | +41.0 |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 108.0 | 71.0 | +37.0 | |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 72.0 | 42.0 | +30.0 | |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 99.0 | 75.0 | +24.0 | |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 76.0 | 54.0 | +22.0 | |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 80.0 | 65.0 | +15.0 | |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 68.0 | 54.0 | +14.0 | |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 71.0 | 65.0 | +6.0 | |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 62.0 | 58.0 | +4.0 | |
| 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 58.0 | 62.0 | -4.0 | |
| 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 65.0 | 71.0 | -6.0 | |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 54.0 | 68.0 | -14.0 | |
| 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 65.0 | 80.0 | -15.0 | |
| 17 | Dominican Chargers W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 54.0 | 76.0 | -22.0 |
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 75.0 | 99.0 | -24.0 | |
| 19 | Shorter W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 42.0 | 72.0 | -30.0 |
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 71.0 | 108.0 | -37.0 | |
| 21 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 40.0 | 81.0 | -41.0 | |
| 22 | Washington Adventist W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 47.0 | 103.0 | -56.0 |
| 23 | Michigan-Dearborn W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 30.0 | 94.0 | -64.0 |
| 24 | Cleary University W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 32.0 | 104.0 | -72.0 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 10 | 22 | 19 | 68 | |
| 12 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 47 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.