PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (30) | 108.4 | 112.1 | 220.5 | -3.7 | 30% |
| Season at home (15) | 107.3 | 113.4 | 220.7 | -6.1 | 27% |
| Season away (15) | 109.5 | 110.8 | 220.3 | -1.3 | 33% |
| Last 10 (10) | 110.6 | 111.0 | 221.6 | -0.4 | 30% |
| Last 5 (5) | 110.8 | 115.2 | 226.0 | -4.4 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (17) | 107.2 | 113.7 | 220.9 | -6.5 | 29% |
| vs Similar (13) | 110.0 | 110.0 | 220.0 | +0.0 | 31% |
| vs Weaker | no games | ||||
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (30) | 101.5 | 102.7 | 204.1 | -1.2 | 50% |
| Season at home (14) | 104.5 | 104.7 | 209.2 | -0.2 | 71% |
| Season away (16) | 98.8 | 100.9 | 199.7 | -2.1 | 31% |
| Last 10 (10) | 98.7 | 105.0 | 203.7 | -6.3 | 20% |
| Last 5 (5) | 105.6 | 109.6 | 215.2 | -4.0 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (1) | 96.0 | 98.0 | 194.0 | -2.0 | 0% |
| vs Similar (23) | 100.6 | 102.1 | 202.7 | -1.5 | 48% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (6) | 105.7 | 105.7 | 211.3 | +0.0 | 67% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 52.7 | 55.2 | 107.9 | -2.6 | 47% | - |
| Last 30 at home (15) | 51.8 | 54.1 | 105.9 | -2.3 | 47% | - |
| Last 30 away (15) | 53.5 | 56.3 | 109.9 | -2.8 | 47% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 54.5 | 54.5 | 109.0 | +0.0 | 40% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 52.4 | 54.2 | 106.6 | -1.8 | 20% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (17) | 50.6 | 54.0 | 104.6 | -3.4 | 41% | - |
| vs Similar (13) | 55.3 | 56.8 | 112.2 | -1.5 | 54% | - |
| vs Weaker | no games | |||||
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 51.3 | 51.1 | 102.3 | +0.2 | 63% | - |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 51.9 | 53.1 | 105.0 | -1.1 | 64% | - |
| Last 30 away (16) | 50.7 | 49.3 | 100.0 | +1.4 | 62% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 50.9 | 51.9 | 102.8 | -1.0 | 60% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 55.6 | 55.4 | 111.0 | +0.2 | 80% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (1) | 38.0 | 50.0 | 88.0 | -12.0 | 0% | - |
| vs Similar (23) | 50.9 | 51.0 | 102.0 | -0.1 | 61% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (6) | 54.8 | 51.3 | 106.2 | +3.5 | 83% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 01/04/17 | Osceola Magic v Delaware Blue Coats | 115-78 |
| 05/03/17 | Osceola Magic v Delaware Blue Coats | 103-123 |
| 04/03/17 | Delaware Blue Coats v Osceola Magic | 132-126 |
| 07/01/17 | Delaware Blue Coats v Osceola Magic | 129-105 |
| 29/03/16 | Delaware Blue Coats v Osceola Magic | 96-94 |
| 03/02/16 | Osceola Magic v Delaware Blue Coats | 100-97 |
| 17/01/16 | Osceola Magic v Delaware Blue Coats | 107-113 |
| 27/12/15 | Delaware Blue Coats v Osceola Magic | 113-110 OT |
| 13/12/15 | Delaware Blue Coats v Osceola Magic | 118-106 |
| 21/11/15 | Osceola Magic v Delaware Blue Coats | 93-103 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27/01/18 | A | Long Island Nets | 110-119 |
| 24/01/18 | H | Raptors 905 | 84-97 |
| 21/01/18 | H | Erie BayHawks | 123-128 OT |
| 20/01/18 | H | Long Island Nets | 110-112 |
| 17/01/18 | H | IPFW | 127-120 |
| 13/01/18 | A | Stockton Kings | 114-118 |
| 11/01/18 | A | Salt Lake City Stars | 131-106 |
| 06/01/18 | A | Greensboro Swarm | 97-84 |
| 03/01/18 | H | Erie BayHawks | 111-112 |
| 02/01/18 | H | Santa Cruz Warriors | 99-114 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28/01/18 | A | Erie BayHawks | 98-110 |
| 27/01/18 | A | Canton Charge | 97-103 OT |
| 24/01/18 | H | Greensboro Swarm | 116-114 OT |
| 21/01/18 | A | Long Island Nets | 102-103 |
| 18/01/18 | H | Erie BayHawks | 115-118 |
| 13/01/18 | A | South Bay Lakers | 86-94 |
| 12/01/18 | A | Memphis Hustle | 117-108 |
| 07/01/18 | A | IPFW | 79-105 |
| 06/01/18 | H | Santa Cruz Warriors | 93-104 |
| 03/01/18 | A | Raptors 905 | 84-91 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLLLL | 30% |
| Home | LWLLL | 27% |
| Away | LWWLL | 33% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 30 | 15 | 15 |
| Win % | 30% | 27% | 33% |
| Points / game | 108.4 | 107.3 | 109.5 |
| Allowed / game | 112.1 | 113.4 | 110.8 |
| Point differential | -3.7 | -6.1 | -1.3 |
| Avg total | 220.5 | 220.7 | 220.3 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 10% | 0% | 20% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 27% (11) | 29% (7) | 25% (4) |
| Overtime % | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLWLL | 50% |
| Home | WWLLW | 71% |
| Away | WLLLL | 31% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 30 | 14 | 16 |
| Win % | 50% | 71% | 31% |
| Points / game | 101.5 | 104.5 | 98.8 |
| Allowed / game | 102.7 | 104.7 | 100.9 |
| Point differential | -1.2 | -0.2 | -2.1 |
| Avg total | 204.1 | 209.2 | 199.7 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 10% | 7% | 12% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 69% (13) | 89% (9) | 25% (4) |
| Overtime % | 10% | 14% | 6% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Westchester | 34 | 22 | 12 | 65% | 106.9 | 103.2 | +3.6 |
| 2 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 33 | 21 | 12 | 64% | 106.0 | 100.8 | +5.2 |
| 3 |  Texas Legends | 32 | 20 | 12 | 62% | 119.6 | 115.3 | +4.2 |
| 4 |  Raptors 905 | 31 | 19 | 12 | 61% | 100.8 | 96.2 | +4.6 |
| 5 |  South Bay Lakers | 30 | 18 | 12 | 60% | 115.3 | 112.7 | +2.6 |
| 6 |  Stockton Kings | 31 | 18 | 13 | 58% | 115.4 | 110.7 | +4.6 |
| 7 |  IPFW | 31 | 18 | 13 | 58% | 110.9 | 108.3 | +2.6 |
| 8 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 33 | 19 | 14 | 58% | 121.6 | 118.4 | +3.2 |
| 9 |  Iowa Wolves | 30 | 17 | 13 | 57% | 107.4 | 108.0 | -0.6 |
| 10 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 32 | 18 | 14 | 56% | 110.7 | 109.4 | +1.3 |
| 11 |  Long Island Nets | 32 | 18 | 14 | 56% | 102.8 | 103.9 | -1.1 |
| 12 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 32 | 17 | 15 | 53% | 111.2 | 107.6 | +3.6 |
| 13 |  Erie BayHawks | 33 | 17 | 16 | 52% | 107.2 | 107.1 | +0.2 |
| 14 |  Maine Red Claws | 32 | 16 | 16 | 50% | 108.9 | 109.4 | -0.5 |
| 15 | Osceola Magic | 30 | 15 | 15 | 50% | 101.5 | 102.7 | -1.2 |
| 16 |  Wisconsin Herd | 32 | 16 | 16 | 50% | 108.4 | 112.2 | -3.8 |
| 17 |  Sioux Falls Skyforce | 33 | 16 | 17 | 48% | 113.3 | 115.3 | -2.1 |
| 18 |  San Diego Clippers | 33 | 16 | 17 | 48% | 104.6 | 108.9 | -4.3 |
| 19 |  Grand Rapids Drive | 33 | 15 | 18 | 45% | 103.0 | 103.1 | -0.1 |
| 20 |  Northern Arizona Suns | 30 | 13 | 17 | 43% | 117.5 | 115.5 | +1.9 |
| 21 |  Windy City Bulls | 30 | 13 | 17 | 43% | 109.4 | 107.7 | +1.7 |
| 22 |  Canton Charge | 31 | 12 | 19 | 39% | 103.3 | 108.9 | -5.6 |
| 23 |  Memphis Hustle | 32 | 12 | 20 | 38% | 112.7 | 115.7 | -3.1 |
| 24 |  Greensboro Swarm | 31 | 10 | 21 | 32% | 103.5 | 108.1 | -4.6 |
| 25 | Delaware Blue Coats | 30 | 9 | 21 | 30% | 108.4 | 112.1 | -3.7 |
| 26 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 33 | 7 | 26 | 21% | 101.4 | 110.3 | -8.9 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware Blue Coats | 19 | 21 | 32 | 21 | 93 |
| Osceola Magic | 26 | 34 | 23 | 35 | 118 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
