LG Sakers host Mobis Phoebus on 14 November 2026 in the KBL, and the Pythia model names the Sakers as the favourite, assigning them a 76% chance of victory because they sit fifth in the league with a 6-7 record, 87.5 points per game and 88.0 allowed, while the Phoebus are tenth with a 3-10 record, 83.2 points per game and 88.5 allowed. The Sakers have gone 2-2 at home, averaging 89.8 points and allowing 86.2, and have won three of their last five games, including a 101-72 win over Seoul Knights on 11 November, a 74-84 loss to KCC Egis on 8 November and an 86-85 win over Goyang Sono on 7 November. The Phoebus have a 1-3 road record, 82.5 points per game and 89.2 allowed, and have won only one of their last five road games, with recent defeats to Goyang Sono, Anyang JungKwanJang and Seoul Thunders all at home. In their ten meetings the Sakers have won nine, most recently defeating the Phoebus 88-83 on 22 October. Pythia projects a 89-81 score, a 169.2 total, a home line of -6.5 with a 56% chance the Sakers cover, and a 4% chance of overtime. The Sakers' recent 101-72 triumph suggests they will maintain their offensive edge.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (13) | 87.5 | 88.0 | 175.5 | -0.5 | 46% |
| Season at home (4) | 89.8 | 86.2 | 176.0 | +3.5 | 50% |
| Season away (9) | 86.6 | 88.8 | 175.3 | -2.2 | 44% |
| Last 10 (10) | 86.7 | 88.7 | 175.4 | -2.0 | 40% |
| Last 5 (5) | 93.6 | 90.4 | 184.0 | +3.2 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (2) | 75.5 | 90.5 | 166.0 | -15.0 | 0% |
| vs Similar (18) | 81.2 | 82.6 | 163.8 | -1.4 | 33% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (10) | 80.7 | 72.6 | 153.3 | +8.1 | 80% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (13) | 83.2 | 88.5 | 171.6 | -5.3 | 23% |
| Season at home (9) | 83.4 | 88.1 | 171.6 | -4.7 | 22% |
| Season away (4) | 82.5 | 89.2 | 171.8 | -6.8 | 25% |
| Last 10 (10) | 83.4 | 88.4 | 171.8 | -5.0 | 30% |
| Last 5 (5) | 80.6 | 88.2 | 168.8 | -7.6 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (21) | 78.9 | 85.0 | 163.9 | -6.2 | 14% |
| vs Similar (9) | 84.6 | 80.4 | 165.0 | +4.1 | 56% |
| vs Weaker | no games | ||||
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 86.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 42.0 | 39.8 | 81.8 | +2.2 | 63% | 40% |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 40.1 | 37.4 | 77.5 | +2.6 | 64% | 21% |
| Last 30 away (16) | 43.8 | 41.9 | 85.6 | +1.9 | 62% | 56% |
| Last 10 (10) | 46.0 | 44.1 | 90.1 | +1.9 | 60% | 70% |
| Last 5 (5) | 47.6 | 43.4 | 91.0 | +4.2 | 60% | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (2) | 43.5 | 46.0 | 89.5 | -2.5 | 50% | 100% |
| vs Similar (18) | 41.2 | 40.1 | 81.3 | +1.1 | 56% | 39% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (10) | 43.2 | 38.0 | 81.2 | +5.2 | 80% | 30% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 86.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 41.1 | 43.6 | 84.7 | -2.5 | 27% | 33% |
| Last 30 at home (17) | 42.0 | 42.4 | 84.4 | -0.4 | 35% | 35% |
| Last 30 away (13) | 40.0 | 45.2 | 85.2 | -5.2 | 15% | 31% |
| Last 10 (10) | 42.5 | 44.2 | 86.7 | -1.7 | 20% | 40% |
| Last 5 (5) | 38.0 | 44.0 | 82.0 | -6.0 | 0% | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (21) | 38.8 | 44.0 | 82.8 | -5.1 | 14% | 24% |
| vs Similar (9) | 46.6 | 42.8 | 89.3 | +3.8 | 56% | 56% |
| vs Weaker | no games | |||||
| Pick | Probability | Avg odds | Best 1 | Best 2 | Best 3 | Best 4 | Best 5 | Edge | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 181 | 77.1% | 1.40 | 1.40 | - | - | - | - | +11.1pp | Won |
| LG Sakers -2.5 | 70.5% | 1.48 | 1.58 | 1.48 | 1.47 | 1.47 | 1.45 | +11.1pp | Lost |
| Under 181.5 | 77.6% | 1.38 | 1.38 | - | - | - | - | +10.6pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus under 88.5 | 78.3% | 1.33 | 1.37 | 1.29 | - | - | - | +10.2pp | Won |
| Under 183.5 | 80.9% | 1.31 | 1.31 | - | - | - | - | +10.0pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus under 90.5 | 83.3% | 1.27 | 1.27 | - | - | - | - | +9.9pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus under 86.5 | 72.4% | 1.45 | 1.50 | 1.45 | 1.40 | - | - | +9.9pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus under 92.5 | 87.5% | 1.20 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | +9.7pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus under 87.5 | 75.4% | 1.36 | 1.39 | 1.34 | - | - | - | +9.6pp | Won |
| Under 180 | 75.3% | 1.40 | 1.40 | - | - | - | - | +9.3pp | Won |
| Under 180.5 | 75.7% | 1.38 | 1.39 | 1.38 | - | - | - | +9.2pp | Won |
| Under 179 | 73.3% | 1.46 | 1.46 | 1.45 | - | - | - | +9.1pp | Won |
| LG Sakers (regulation) | 74.1% | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.38 | - | - | +9.0pp | Lost |
| Under 188.5 | 87.8% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +8.9pp | Won |
| LG Sakers +3.5 | 83.4% | 1.23 | 1.23 | - | - | - | - | +8.9pp | Won |
| Under 178 | 71.3% | 1.50 | 1.51 | 1.50 | - | - | - | +8.8pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus under 93.5 | 89.2% | 1.15 | 1.15 | - | - | - | - | +8.7pp | Won |
| LG Sakers under 97.5 | 81.0% | 1.28 | 1.28 | - | - | - | - | +8.6pp | Won |
| Under 179.5 | 73.8% | 1.42 | 1.44 | 1.43 | 1.39 | - | - | +8.5pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus under 94.5 | 90.8% | 1.13 | 1.13 | - | - | - | - | +8.5pp | Won |
| LG Sakers -1.5 | 74.2% | 1.42 | 1.51 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.39 | +8.4pp | Lost |
| Under 182.5 | 79.3% | 1.31 | 1.31 | - | - | - | - | +8.3pp | Won |
| LG Sakers under 95.5 | 75.1% | 1.38 | 1.38 | - | - | - | - | +8.1pp | Won |
| Under 178.5 | 71.9% | 1.46 | 1.49 | 1.47 | 1.42 | - | - | +8.0pp | Won |
| Under 187.5 | 86.6% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +7.7pp | Won |
| LG Sakers -2 | 73.2% | 1.42 | 1.42 | 1.42 | - | - | - | +7.7pp | Lost |
| LG Sakers +1.5 | 78.5% | 1.29 | 1.33 | 1.29 | 1.28 | 1.28 | - | +7.6pp | Won |
| LG Sakers under 98.5 | 83.5% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | +7.4pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus under 96.5 | 93.4% | 1.09 | 1.09 | - | - | - | - | +7.3pp | Won |
| Under 193.5 | 92.6% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | +7.1pp | Won |
| LG Sakers under 99.5 | 85.9% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +7.0pp | Won |
| LG Sakers -1 | 75.9% | 1.35 | 1.36 | 1.35 | - | - | - | +7.0pp | Lost |
| LG Sakers under 96.5 | 78.2% | 1.30 | 1.30 | - | - | - | - | +6.7pp | Won |
| LG Sakers +1 | 78.1% | 1.29 | 1.30 | 1.29 | - | - | - | +6.6pp | Push |
| Under 197.5 | 95.2% | 1.05 | 1.05 | - | - | - | - | +6.2pp | Won |
| LG Sakers win | 76.5% | 1.35 | 1.37 | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.34 | +5.9pp | Lost |
| LG Sakers +2.5 | 81.4% | 1.23 | 1.25 | 1.20 | - | - | - | +5.8pp | Won |
| Under 192.5 | 91.8% | 1.09 | 1.09 | - | - | - | - | +5.7pp | Won |
| LG Sakers over 70.5 | 96.3% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +5.5pp | Won |
| LG Sakers over 69.5 | 97.0% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +5.5pp | Won |
| LG Sakers +12.5 | 95.7% | 1.03 | 1.03 | - | - | - | - | +5.2pp | Won |
| LG Sakers over 72.5 | 94.4% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +5.1pp | Won |
| LG Sakers over 71.5 | 95.4% | 1.03 | 1.03 | - | - | - | - | +5.0pp | Won |
| LG Sakers under 94.5 | 71.9% | 1.35 | 1.41 | 1.29 | - | - | - | +4.7pp | Won |
| LG Sakers +17.5 | 98.1% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +4.4pp | Won |
| Overtime: no | 95.9% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +4.4pp | Won |
| LG Sakers over 73.5 | 93.3% | 1.05 | 1.05 | - | - | - | - | +4.3pp | Won |
| LG Sakers +7.5 | 90.6% | 1.08 | 1.08 | - | - | - | - | +4.0pp | Won |
| LG Sakers over 74.5 | 91.9% | 1.06 | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | +3.9pp | Won |
| LG Sakers over 78.5 | 84.3% | 1.15 | 1.15 | - | - | - | - | +3.8pp | Lost |
| LG Sakers over 76.5 | 88.6% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | +3.5pp | Won |
| LG Sakers over 75.5 | 90.3% | 1.07 | 1.07 | - | - | - | - | +3.2pp | Won |
| LG Sakers over 79.5 | 81.8% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +3.0pp | Lost |
| LG Sakers over 80.5 | 79.1% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | +3.0pp | Lost |
| LG Sakers over 77.5 | 86.5% | 1.11 | 1.11 | - | - | - | - | +2.7pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus +22.5 | 89.3% | 1.07 | 1.07 | - | - | - | - | +2.2pp | Won |
| LG Sakers over 82.5 | 73.0% | 1.28 | 1.29 | 1.27 | - | - | - | +2.1pp | Lost |
| Over 147.5 | 90.6% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +0.9pp | Won |
| LG Sakers over 81.5 | 76.2% | 1.23 | 1.23 | - | - | - | - | +0.9pp | Lost |
| Mobis Phoebus +17.5 | 79.6% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +0.7pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus +15.5 | 74.3% | 1.26 | 1.26 | - | - | - | - | +0.3pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus +15 | 73.6% | 1.27 | 1.27 | - | - | - | - | +0.2pp | Won |
| Over 148.5 | 89.5% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | -0.1pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus over 68.5 | 87.8% | 1.06 | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | -0.1pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus over 69.5 | 85.7% | 1.09 | 1.09 | - | - | - | - | -0.4pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus over 71.5 | 80.8% | 1.13 | 1.13 | - | - | - | - | -1.5pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus over 70.5 | 83.4% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | -1.7pp | Won |
| Over 152.5 | 84.3% | 1.08 | 1.08 | - | - | - | - | -2.3pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus +14.5 | 71.4% | 1.25 | 1.26 | 1.24 | - | - | - | -2.5pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus +14 | 70.5% | 1.27 | 1.27 | - | - | - | - | -2.6pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus over 72.5 | 77.9% | 1.15 | 1.15 | - | - | - | - | -2.6pp | Won |
| Over 153.5 | 82.8% | 1.09 | 1.09 | - | - | - | - | -3.3pp | Won |
| Over 157.5 | 75.7% | 1.16 | 1.16 | - | - | - | - | -3.8pp | Lost |
| Mobis Phoebus over 73.5 | 74.9% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | -4.0pp | Won |
| Mobis Phoebus over 74.5 | 71.6% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | -4.5pp | Won |
| Over 158.5 | 73.8% | 1.16 | 1.16 | - | - | - | - | -5.7pp | Lost |
| LG Sakers +2 | 80.8% | 1.24 | 1.24 | - | - | - | - | - | Won |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Shot type | Attempts per game | Made per game | Accuracy (made ÷ attempts) | League accuracy | Points per game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏀🏀 2-pointers | 39.5 | 20.7 | 55.6% | 41.4 | |
| 🏀🏀🏀 3-pointers | 31.0 | 11.5 | 35.2% | 34.5 | |
| 🏀 Free throws | 17.3 | 12.0 | 74.2% | 12.0 |
| Shot type | Attempts per game | Made per game | Accuracy (made ÷ attempts) | League accuracy | Points per game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏀🏀 2-pointers | 43.0 | 23.4 | 55.6% | 46.8 | |
| 🏀🏀🏀 3-pointers | 23.4 | 8.4 | 35.2% | 25.2 | |
| 🏀 Free throws | 17.5 | 13.0 | 74.2% | 13.0 |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 22/10/26 | Mobis Phoebus v LG Sakers | 83-88 |
| 08/04/26 | Mobis Phoebus v LG Sakers | 78-56 |
| 06/03/26 | LG Sakers v Mobis Phoebus | 83-75 |
| 31/01/26 | LG Sakers v Mobis Phoebus | 76-65 |
| 31/12/25 | Mobis Phoebus v LG Sakers | 68-71 |
| 06/12/25 | LG Sakers v Mobis Phoebus | 90-60 |
| 25/10/25 | Mobis Phoebus v LG Sakers | 75-87 |
| 28/04/25 | Mobis Phoebus v LG Sakers | 74-76 |
| 26/04/25 | LG Sakers v Mobis Phoebus | 84-75 |
| 24/04/25 | LG Sakers v Mobis Phoebus | 67-64 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/11/26 | H | Seoul Knights | 101-72 |
| 08/11/26 | H | KCC Egis | 74-84 |
| 07/11/26 | H | Goyang Sono | 86-85 |
| 01/11/26 | H | Wonju DB | 98-104 |
| 26/10/26 | A | Goyang Sono | 109-107 |
| 24/10/26 | A | Seoul Knights | 85-86 |
| 22/10/26 | A | Mobis Phoebus | 88-83 |
| 17/10/26 | A | KoGas | 75-85 |
| 15/10/26 | A | Seoul Thunders | 86-93 |
| 11/10/26 | A | Anyang JungKwanJang | 65-88 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/26 | H | Goyang Sono | 79-86 |
| 08/11/26 | H | Anyang JungKwanJang | 85-91 |
| 05/11/26 | H | Seoul Thunders | 76-81 |
| 31/10/26 | A | KoGas | 67-94 |
| 29/10/26 | H | KCC Egis | 96-89 |
| 24/10/26 | H | Seoul Thunders | 71-91 |
| 22/10/26 | H | LG Sakers | 83-88 |
| 18/10/26 | A | Suwon KT | 96-80 |
| 16/10/26 | A | Goyang Sono | 82-95 |
| 12/10/26 | H | Wonju DB | 99-89 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLWLW | 46% |
| Home | LWLW | 50% |
| Away | LLWLW | 44% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 13 | 4 | 9 |
| Win % | 46% | 50% | 44% |
| Points / game | 87.5 | 89.8 | 86.6 |
| Allowed / game | 88.0 | 86.2 | 88.8 |
| Point differential | -0.5 | +3.5 | -2.2 |
| Avg total | 175.5 | 176.0 | 175.3 |
| Over 171.5 | 38% | 50% | 33% |
| Win by 10+ | 15% | 25% | 11% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 80% (5) | 100% (1) | 75% (4) |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLLLL | 23% |
| Home | LWLLL | 22% |
| Away | LLWL | 25% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 13 | 9 | 4 |
| Win % | 23% | 22% | 25% |
| Points / game | 83.2 | 83.4 | 82.5 |
| Allowed / game | 88.5 | 88.1 | 89.2 |
| Point differential | -5.3 | -4.7 | -6.8 |
| Avg total | 171.6 | 171.6 | 171.8 |
| Over 171.5 | 54% | 44% | 75% |
| Win by 10+ | 15% | 11% | 25% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 0% (3) | 0% (2) | 0% (1) |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seoul Thunders | 13 | 11 | 2 | 85% | 84.2 | 79.5 | +4.7 |
| 2 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 69% | 83.5 | 78.9 | +4.5 | |
| 3 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 60% | 83.5 | 82.1 | +1.4 | |
| 4 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 57% | 90.4 | 88.9 | +1.5 | |
| 5 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 46% | 87.5 | 88.0 | -0.5 | |
| 6 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 43% | 82.5 | 82.9 | -0.4 | |
| 7 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 43% | 84.9 | 87.0 | -2.1 | |
| 8 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 40% | 89.3 | 89.7 | -0.5 | |
| 9 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 38% | 87.6 | 90.5 | -2.9 | |
| 10 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23% | 83.2 | 88.5 | -5.3 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 24 | 24 | 13 | 78 | |
| 16 | 25 | 19 | 19 | 79 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.