PythiaBasketballBETA Best Picks Games Leagues Teams Players Pro Picks PRO Validation Research Pricing Log in

Montana 2003 W vs Studio Zagreb W Result & Analysis

Date: Mon 09 Feb 2026
Tip-off: 15:30
Final 87-63
13-12 27-14 22-19 25-18
Position#2
Record8-3
FormWLLWL
Points / game64.5
Allowed / game57.5
vs
Position#6
Record3-8
FormLWLWW
Points / game54.3
Allowed / game63.9
EuropeWABA League WomenRound 14· Mladost
Women2025-26
Meetings · Montana 2003 W v Studio Zagreb W
02 Oct 2026
MONT100
STUD68
09 Feb 2026
MONT87
STUD63
Sections

🎯 1. Model Analysis

Montana 2003 W winWon
-no forecast
Best oddsnone
Implied-
Edge-
Studio Zagreb W winLost
-no forecast
Best oddsnone
Implied-
Edge-
No frozen forecast was made for this game before tip-off.

🏀 2. Points Analysis

Montana 2003 WLast 10 – points for & against
Opponent
Position
Result
Score
Points
Margin
🔥 FormW
Date
Competition
Cinkarna Celje W
#3
W
82-69
82
69
+13
76avg 73
H11/10
WABA League Women
Buducnost W
#1
W
88-82
88
82
+6
87avg 73
H23/10
WABA League Women
Rilski Sportist W
#5
W
96-78
96
78
+18
83avg 73
A29/10
WABA League Women
Partizan W
#4
W
67-57
67
57
+10
64avg 73
H26/11
WABA League Women
Studio Zagreb W
#6
W
92-85
92
85
+7
81avg 73
A03/12
WABA League Women
Orlovi W
#7
W
20-0
20
0
+20
67avg 73
A10/12
WABA League Women
Cinkarna Celje W
#3
L
61-69
61
69
-8
58avg 73
A16/12
WABA League Women
Buducnost W
#1
L
58-80
58
80
-22
no box
A15/01
WABA League Women
Rilski Sportist W
#5
W
79-53
79
53
+26
82avg 73
H21/01
WABA League Women
Partizan W
#4
L
46-59
46
59
-13
34avg 73
A04/02
WABA League Women
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
32-18
25-15
7-13
18-23
17-23
22-20
31-15
18-24
20-13
20-25
29-21
27-19
20-7
17-18
19-14
11-18
20-13
24-28
24-22
24-22
–
–
–
–
21-15
12-15
15-17
13-22
15-15
15-25
16-16
12-24
13-19
22-8
26-12
18-14
13-11
9-5
10-21
14-22
132.1Avg total
68.9Scored
63.2Allowed
SplitScoredAllowedTotalMarginWin %
Season (11)64.557.5121.9+7.073%
Season at home (5)67.252.2119.4+15.0100%
Season away (6)62.261.8124.0+0.350%
Last 10 (10)68.963.2132.1+5.770%
Last 5 (5)52.852.2105.0+0.640%
Last 30 games by opponent strength
vs Stronger (7)65.778.1143.9-12.414%
vs Similar (7)68.966.1135.0+2.757%
vs Weaker ◀ (16)66.851.1117.9+15.694%
This opponent (Studio Zagreb W) is Weaker. The matching 'vs' row is the one to weigh.
Studio Zagreb WLast 10 – points for & against
Opponent
Position
Result
Score
Points
Margin
🔥 FormW
Date
Competition
Sibenik W
#5
L
80-86
80
86
-6
66avg 73
A14/12
Premijer Liga Women
Zadar Plus W
#11
W
125-64
125
64
+61
127avg 73
H20/12
Premijer Liga Women
Ragusa Dubrovnik W
#2
W
83-66
83
66
+17
80avg 73
A10/01
Premijer Liga Women
Orlovi W
#7
W
20-0
20
0
+20
no box
A14/01
WABA League Women
FSV Rijeka W
#6
W
74-68
74
68
+6
no box
H17/01
Premijer Liga Women
Cinkarna Celje W
#3
L
57-73
57
73
-16
56avg 73
H21/01
WABA League Women
Split W
#13
W
70-40
70
40
+30
62avg 73
A24/01
Premijer Liga Women
Buducnost W
#1
L
63-73
63
73
-10
64avg 73
H28/01
WABA League Women
Medvescak W
#12
W
94-67
94
67
+27
92avg 73
H31/01
Premijer Liga Women
Rilski Sportist W
#5
W
66-59
66
59
+7
66avg 73
A03/02
WABA League Women
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
13-27
29-21
21-23
17-15
44-20
27-16
26-19
28-9
26-15
11-22
27-7
19-22
–
–
–
–
27-19
21-14
13-15
13-20
16-18
15-21
8-13
18-21
20-12
13-6
18-11
19-11
23-17
13-16
12-21
15-19
17-19
29-26
31-6
17-16
23-16
15-11
11-21
17-11
132.8Avg total
73.2Scored
59.6Allowed
SplitScoredAllowedTotalMarginWin %
Season (11)54.363.9118.2-9.627%
Season at home (6)60.567.2127.7-6.717%
Season away (5)46.860.0106.8-13.240%
Last 10 (10)73.259.6132.8+13.670%
Last 5 (5)70.062.4132.4+7.660%
Last 30 games by opponent strength
vs Stronger ◀ (8)58.578.2136.8-19.80%
vs Similar (5)72.070.4142.4+1.660%
vs Weaker (13)82.951.2134.1+31.892%
This opponent (Montana 2003 W) is Stronger. The matching 'vs' row is the one to weigh.

📊 3. Team Totals

No team totals priced for this game yet.

⚖️ 4. Spread

No spread forecast for this game yet.

⏱️ 5. Quarters & Halves

Quarter by quarter

-6-3+0+3+6Q1Q1: +4.1+4.1Q1: +5.1+5.1Q2Q2: +0.8+0.8Q2: +2.2+2.2Q3Q3: +2.9+2.9Q3: +3.4+3.4Q4Q4: -3.7-3.7Q4: +2.1+2.1
-6-3+0+3+6Q1Q1: +4.1+4.1Q1: +5.1+5.1Q2Q2: +0.8+0.8Q2: +2.2+2.2Q3Q3: +2.9+2.9Q3: +3.4+3.4Q4Q4: -3.7-3.7Q4: +2.1+2.1
Montana 2003 WStudio Zagreb W
Each team's average quarter over its last 10 games. Net is the quarter margin (above zero = the team wins that quarter on average: who starts fast, who closes); Pythia projection = the quarter means of tonight's simulation. Hover a bar for its value.
Bets by quarter and half · pick a period
Montana 2003 WLast 10 – 1st half points for & against
Opponent
Position
Result
Score
Points
Margin
Date
Competition
Cinkarna Celje W
#3
W
57-33
57
33
+24
H11/10
WABA League Women
Buducnost W
#1
L
39-43
39
43
-4
H23/10
WABA League Women
Rilski Sportist W
#5
W
40-38
40
38
+2
A29/10
WABA League Women
Partizan W
#4
W
37-25
37
25
+12
H26/11
WABA League Women
Studio Zagreb W
#6
W
44-41
44
41
+3
A03/12
WABA League Women
Cinkarna Celje W
#3
W
33-30
33
30
+3
A16/12
WABA League Women
Buducnost W
#1
L
30-40
30
40
-10
A15/01
WABA League Women
Rilski Sportist W
#5
W
35-27
35
27
+8
H21/01
WABA League Women
Partizan W
#4
W
22-16
22
16
+6
A04/02
WABA League Women
70.0Avg total
37.4Scored
32.6Allowed
1st halfScoredAllowedTotalMarginWon the halfOver main line
Last 30 (26)37.135.472.5+1.750%-
Last 30 at home (12)38.334.472.8+3.950%-
Last 30 away (14)36.036.372.3-0.350%-
Last 10 (9)37.432.670.0+4.978%-
Last 5 (5)32.830.863.6+2.080%-
Last 30 games by opponent strength
vs Stronger (7)33.140.073.1-6.90%-
vs Similar (7)39.031.170.1+7.971%-
vs Weaker ◀ (12)38.235.273.5+3.067%-
This opponent (Studio Zagreb W) is Weaker. The matching 'vs' row is the one to weigh.
Studio Zagreb WLast 10 – 1st half points for & against
Opponent
Position
Result
Score
Points
Margin
Date
Competition
Sibenik W
#5
L
42-48
42
48
-6
A14/12
Premijer Liga Women
Zadar Plus W
#11
W
71-36
71
36
+35
H20/12
Premijer Liga Women
Ragusa Dubrovnik W
#2
D
37-37
37
37
+0
A10/01
Premijer Liga Women
FSV Rijeka W
#6
W
48-33
48
33
+15
H17/01
Premijer Liga Women
Cinkarna Celje W
#3
L
31-39
31
39
-8
H21/01
WABA League Women
Split W
#13
W
33-18
33
18
+15
A24/01
Premijer Liga Women
Buducnost W
#1
W
36-33
36
33
+3
H28/01
WABA League Women
Medvescak W
#12
W
46-45
46
45
+1
H31/01
Premijer Liga Women
Rilski Sportist W
#5
W
38-27
38
27
+11
A03/02
WABA League Women
77.6Avg total
42.4Scored
35.1Allowed
1st halfScoredAllowedTotalMarginWon the halfOver main line
Last 30 (24)40.435.175.5+5.354%-
Last 30 at home (13)42.236.278.4+6.154%-
Last 30 away (11)38.333.972.2+4.455%-
Last 10 (9)42.435.177.6+7.367%-
Last 5 (5)36.832.469.2+4.480%-
Last 30 games by opponent strength
vs Stronger ◀ (8)32.039.971.9-7.912%-
vs Similar (5)35.036.071.0-1.040%-
vs Weaker (11)49.031.380.3+17.791%-
This opponent (Montana 2003 W) is Stronger. The matching 'vs' row is the one to weigh.
1st half bets · Pythia's probability, the best price and the edge
No 1st half markets priced for this game yet.

⭐ 6. Specials 🔒 Pro

No special markets priced for this game yet.

🔥 7. Top picks for this game

No priced selection above 70% for this game yet.
Free daily update

Get it on Telegram

Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.

Join the channel

🎯 8. Shooting Profile

Show:Over:
Montana 2003 Wtheir own shots, last 10 games

Where their points come from

Montana 2003 W: 76.5 points a game scored
🏀🏀56%
🏀🏀🏀23%
🏀21%
🏀🏀 2-pointers43.0 pts a game · 56% of the points
🏀🏀🏀 3-pointers17.4 pts a game · 23% of the points
🏀 Free throws16.1 pts a game · 21% of the points
League average for comparison: 69.0 points a game
54%
29%
17%

Shooting by shot type

Shot typeAttempts per gameMade per gameAccuracy
(made ÷ attempts)
League accuracyPoints per game
🏀🏀 2-pointers44.421.5
48.4%
46.8%43.0
🏀🏀🏀 3-pointers22.15.8
26.2%
29.7%17.4
🏀 Free throws21.216.1
75.9%
70.0%16.1
They take 66.5 shots from the field a game (2-pointers + 3-pointers); 22.1 of them are 3-pointers, so 33% of their shots are threes (league average: 36%). Accuracy is green when it beats the league average.
Studio Zagreb Wtheir own shots, last 10 games

Where their points come from

Studio Zagreb W: 77.2 points a game scored
🏀🏀56%
🏀🏀🏀29%
🏀15%
🏀🏀 2-pointers43.4 pts a game · 56% of the points
🏀🏀🏀 3-pointers22.2 pts a game · 29% of the points
🏀 Free throws11.6 pts a game · 15% of the points
League average for comparison: 69.0 points a game
54%
29%
17%

Shooting by shot type

Shot typeAttempts per gameMade per gameAccuracy
(made ÷ attempts)
League accuracyPoints per game
🏀🏀 2-pointers41.021.7
52.9%
46.8%43.4
🏀🏀🏀 3-pointers23.87.4
31.1%
29.7%22.2
🏀 Free throws18.111.6
64.1%
70.0%11.6
They take 64.8 shots from the field a game (2-pointers + 3-pointers); 23.8 of them are 3-pointers, so 37% of their shots are threes (league average: 36%). Accuracy is green when it beats the league average.

💪 9. Team Strengths

Side by side

Last 10/10 games with a box score before 09 Feb 2026 (all competitions); ratings are points per 100 possessions. The better figure is green.
Montana 2003 W
LWLLWWWWWW
Studio Zagreb W
WWLWLWWWWL
#2
League position
#6
+14.1
Net rating
+13.9
93.7
Offensive rating
89.5
79.6
Defensive rating
75.6
45.4%
Effective FG%
50.6%
40.5%
Opp. effective FG%
42.0%
19.2%
Turnover %
20.7%
30.1%
Off. rebound %
33.5%
0.32
Free-throw rate
0.28
26.2%
3-point %
31.1%
68.9%
Assist %
73.2%
70%
Form (last 10/10)
70%

Profile

Offence93.7 · 89.5Defence79.6 · 75.6Shooting45.4% · 50.6%3-point %26.2% · 31.1%Ball care19.2% · 20.7%Off. rebounds30.1% · 33.5%Free throws0.32 · 0.28Form (last 10/10)70% · 70%
■ Montana 2003 W   ■ Studio Zagreb W
The middle ring is the league average on each axis; outward = better than the league (defence and ball care: fewer points / turnovers is better). Form: share of the last 10 won. The figures are each team's own, the better one bold.

🤝 10. Games History

Head-to-head record
1
Montana 2003 W wins
0
Studio Zagreb W wins
DateGameScore
03/12/25Studio Zagreb W v Montana 2003 W85-92
DateH/AOpponentScore
04/02/26APartizan W46-59
21/01/26HRilski Sportist W79-53
15/01/26ABuducnost W58-80
16/12/25ACinkarna Celje W61-69
10/12/25AOrlovi W20-0
03/12/25AStudio Zagreb W92-85
26/11/25HPartizan W67-57
29/10/25ARilski Sportist W96-78
23/10/25HBuducnost W88-82
11/10/25HCinkarna Celje W82-69
DateH/AOpponentScore
03/02/26ARilski Sportist W66-59
31/01/26HMedvescak W94-67
28/01/26HBuducnost W63-73
24/01/26ASplit W70-40
21/01/26HCinkarna Celje W57-73
17/01/26HFSV Rijeka W74-68
14/01/26AOrlovi W20-0
10/01/26ARagusa Dubrovnik W83-66
20/12/25HZadar Plus W125-64
14/12/25ASibenik W80-86

📊 11. Overall Statistics

Montana 2003 W
WABA League Women 2025-26
Recent: 7 Wins / 3 Losses (last 10)
FormLast 5Win %
OverallWLLWL73%
HomeWWWWW100%
AwayWWLLL50%
StatsOverallHomeAway
Games1156
Win %73%100%50%
Points / game64.567.262.2
Allowed / game57.552.261.8
Point differential+7.0+15.0+0.3
Avg total121.9119.4124.0
Over main line---
Win by 10+55%80%33%
Close games (≤5 pts) won---
Overtime %0%0%0%
Studio Zagreb W
WABA League Women 2025-26
Recent: 7 Wins / 3 Losses (last 10)
FormLast 5Win %
OverallLWLLW27%
HomeLLLLL17%
AwayLLLWW40%
StatsOverallHomeAway
Games1165
Win %27%17%40%
Points / game54.360.546.8
Allowed / game63.967.260.0
Point differential-9.6-6.7-13.2
Avg total118.2127.7106.8
Over main line---
Win by 10+18%17%20%
Close games (≤5 pts) won---
Overtime %0%0%0%
This competition's season before tip-off. Green = better than tonight's opponent on the same split; win-% badge green from 60%, red below 40%.

🏆 12. League Table

#TeamGPWLWin %PF/gPA/gDiff
1 Buducnost W1210283%68.651.0+17.6
2 Montana 2003 W118373%64.557.5+7.0
3 Cinkarna Celje W128467%63.956.3+7.6
4 Partizan W128467%59.351.8+7.5
5 Studio Zagreb W113827%54.363.9-9.6
6 Rilski Sportist W113827%61.074.0-13.0
7 Orlovi W110110%0.020.0-20.0
Built from this season's results before tip-off (all phases of the competition). Click a column to sort. Bars: win %, points scored and allowed per game across the league, and the point differential (green +, red -).

📋 13. Box Score

TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Montana 2003 W1327222587
Studio Zagreb W1214191863
← all games of the day
18+ · BASKETBALL ANALYTICS, NOT BETTING ADVICE

PythiaBasketball uses cookies

We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.