PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (11) | 102.0 | 101.3 | 203.3 | +0.7 | 64% |
| Season at home (5) | 105.2 | 104.4 | 209.6 | +0.8 | 60% |
| Season away (6) | 99.3 | 98.7 | 198.0 | +0.7 | 67% |
| Last 10 (10) | 100.5 | 102.5 | 203.0 | -2.0 | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 98.8 | 105.0 | 203.8 | -6.2 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (1) | 93.0 | 115.0 | 208.0 | -22.0 | 0% |
| vs Similar (18) | 105.0 | 104.9 | 209.9 | +0.1 | 61% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (11) | 112.9 | 104.7 | 217.6 | +8.2 | 73% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (11) | 116.5 | 120.7 | 237.2 | -4.3 | 27% |
| Season at home (3) | 118.0 | 124.3 | 242.3 | -6.3 | 33% |
| Season away (8) | 115.9 | 119.4 | 235.2 | -3.5 | 25% |
| Last 10 (10) | 115.9 | 122.0 | 237.9 | -6.1 | 20% |
| Last 5 (5) | 115.0 | 122.8 | 237.8 | -7.8 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (13) | 113.5 | 118.9 | 232.5 | -5.4 | 23% |
| vs Similar (14) | 111.3 | 112.0 | 223.3 | -0.7 | 43% |
| vs Weaker (3) | 104.7 | 98.0 | 202.7 | +6.7 | 100% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 55.0 | 50.4 | 105.4 | +4.5 | 70% | - |
| Last 30 at home (15) | 59.3 | 51.6 | 110.9 | +7.7 | 73% | - |
| Last 30 away (15) | 50.7 | 49.3 | 99.9 | +1.4 | 67% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 51.5 | 48.8 | 100.3 | +2.7 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 47.4 | 49.8 | 97.2 | -2.4 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (1) | 56.0 | 56.0 | 112.0 | +0.0 | 0% | - |
| vs Similar (18) | 53.6 | 50.5 | 104.1 | +3.1 | 67% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (11) | 57.2 | 49.8 | 107.0 | +7.4 | 82% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 54.8 | 56.2 | 111.0 | -1.4 | 47% | - |
| Last 30 at home (11) | 56.6 | 58.5 | 115.1 | -1.8 | 45% | - |
| Last 30 away (19) | 53.7 | 54.9 | 108.7 | -1.2 | 47% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 53.4 | 60.3 | 113.7 | -6.9 | 40% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 53.4 | 64.2 | 117.6 | -10.8 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (13) | 52.5 | 59.1 | 111.5 | -6.6 | 31% | - |
| vs Similar (14) | 55.9 | 55.6 | 111.5 | +0.2 | 50% | - |
| vs Weaker (3) | 60.0 | 46.7 | 106.7 | +13.3 | 100% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 07/12/19 | Osceola Magic v Greensboro Swarm | 112-111 |
| 26/01/19 | Osceola Magic v Greensboro Swarm | 98-106 |
| 05/01/19 | Greensboro Swarm v Osceola Magic | 107-117 |
| 18/11/18 | Greensboro Swarm v Osceola Magic | 107-99 |
| 17/11/18 | Osceola Magic v Greensboro Swarm | 102-89 |
| 21/02/18 | Osceola Magic v Greensboro Swarm | 88-98 |
| 10/02/18 | Greensboro Swarm v Osceola Magic | 116-120 |
| 24/01/18 | Osceola Magic v Greensboro Swarm | 116-114 OT |
| 24/12/17 | Greensboro Swarm v Osceola Magic | 102-106 |
| 07/02/17 | Osceola Magic v Greensboro Swarm | 91-90 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/12/19 | H | Greensboro Swarm | 112-111 |
| 03/12/19 | A | Capital City Go-Go | 107-106 |
| 01/12/19 | H | Delaware Blue Coats | 83-109 |
| 26/11/19 | A | Austin Toros Spurs | 71-97 |
| 24/11/19 | A | Northern Arizona Suns | 121-102 |
| 21/11/19 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 93-115 |
| 17/11/19 | H | Erie BayHawks | 113-88 |
| 17/11/19 | H | College Park Skyhawks | 125-99 |
| 12/11/19 | A | Westchester | 106-100 |
| 10/11/19 | A | Canton Charge | 74-98 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/12/19 | A | Osceola Magic | 111-112 |
| 04/12/19 | A | College Park Skyhawks | 108-130 |
| 01/12/19 | A | Capital City Go-Go | 117-123 |
| 30/11/19 | A | Capital City Go-Go | 108-94 |
| 28/11/19 | H | Maine Red Claws | 131-155 |
| 23/11/19 | H | Windy City Bulls | 114-102 |
| 17/11/19 | A | Grand Rapids Drive | 104-118 |
| 16/11/19 | A | Grand Rapids Drive | 122-129 |
| 13/11/19 | H | Westchester | 109-116 |
| 12/11/19 | A | Delaware Blue Coats | 135-141 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLLWW | 64% |
| Home | WWLLW | 60% |
| Away | LWWLW | 67% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 11 | 5 | 6 |
| Win % | 64% | 60% | 67% |
| Points / game | 102.0 | 105.2 | 99.3 |
| Allowed / game | 101.3 | 104.4 | 98.7 |
| Point differential | +0.7 | +0.8 | +0.7 |
| Avg total | 203.3 | 209.6 | 198.0 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 36% | 40% | 33% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 100% (2) | 100% (1) | 100% (1) |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LWLLL | 27% |
| Home | LWL | 33% |
| Away | LWLLL | 25% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 11 | 3 | 8 |
| Win % | 27% | 33% | 25% |
| Points / game | 116.5 | 118.0 | 115.9 |
| Allowed / game | 120.7 | 124.3 | 119.4 |
| Point differential | -4.3 | -6.3 | -3.5 |
| Avg total | 237.2 | 242.3 | 235.2 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 27% | 33% | 25% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 0% (1) | - | 0% (1) |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Memphis Hustle | 10 | 10 | 0 | 100% | 120.9 | 106.1 | +14.8 |
| 2 |  Wisconsin Herd | 11 | 10 | 1 | 91% | 120.4 | 111.5 | +8.9 |
| 3 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 9 | 7 | 2 | 78% | 110.1 | 103.9 | +6.2 |
| 4 |  Canton Charge | 11 | 8 | 3 | 73% | 111.2 | 108.7 | +2.5 |
| 5 |  Stockton Kings | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70% | 114.3 | 108.2 | +6.1 |
| 6 |  Maine Red Claws | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70% | 121.3 | 115.5 | +5.8 |
| 7 |  Grand Rapids Drive | 14 | 9 | 5 | 64% | 108.1 | 105.1 | +2.9 |
| 8 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 11 | 7 | 4 | 64% | 119.7 | 117.7 | +2.0 |
| 9 | Osceola Magic | 11 | 7 | 4 | 64% | 102.0 | 101.3 | +0.7 |
| 10 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 11 | 6 | 5 | 55% | 110.5 | 109.5 | +1.0 |
| 11 |  Texas Legends | 11 | 6 | 5 | 55% | 113.3 | 114.3 | -1.0 |
| 12 |  Windy City Bulls | 10 | 5 | 5 | 50% | 109.4 | 108.1 | +1.3 |
| 13 |  Iowa Wolves | 10 | 5 | 5 | 50% | 117.4 | 117.1 | +0.3 |
| 14 |  San Diego Clippers | 10 | 5 | 5 | 50% | 107.8 | 107.8 | +0.0 |
| 15 |  South Bay Lakers | 10 | 5 | 5 | 50% | 118.3 | 118.4 | -0.1 |
| 16 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 12 | 6 | 6 | 50% | 105.8 | 107.3 | -1.5 |
| 17 |  College Park Skyhawks | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45% | 110.5 | 110.4 | +0.2 |
| 18 |  Capital City Go-Go | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45% | 111.2 | 111.5 | -0.3 |
| 19 |  Sioux Falls Skyforce | 12 | 5 | 7 | 42% | 111.9 | 111.6 | +0.3 |
| 20 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 8 | 3 | 5 | 38% | 116.2 | 117.8 | -1.5 |
| 21 |  Erie BayHawks | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36% | 113.7 | 118.5 | -4.7 |
| 22 |  Raptors 905 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33% | 112.2 | 116.1 | -3.9 |
| 23 |  Westchester | 10 | 3 | 7 | 30% | 103.5 | 107.2 | -3.7 |
| 24 | Greensboro Swarm | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27% | 116.5 | 120.7 | -4.3 |
| 25 |  Northern Arizona Suns | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20% | 108.1 | 118.5 | -10.4 |
| 26 |  Long Island Nets | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18% | 112.2 | 118.5 | -6.3 |
| 27 |  IPFW | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18% | 106.0 | 114.4 | -8.4 |
| 28 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 12 | 2 | 10 | 17% | 114.7 | 120.6 | -5.9 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osceola Magic | 27 | 21 | 24 | 22 | 94 |
| Greensboro Swarm | 18 | 31 | 31 | 24 | 104 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
