PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (22) | 108.1 | 107.5 | 215.5 | +0.6 | 55% |
| Season at home (11) | 108.5 | 105.6 | 214.1 | +2.8 | 64% |
| Season away (11) | 107.7 | 109.3 | 217.0 | -1.5 | 45% |
| Last 10 (10) | 111.9 | 108.3 | 220.2 | +3.6 | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 112.2 | 115.0 | 227.2 | -2.8 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar (17) | 108.6 | 108.4 | 216.9 | +0.2 | 53% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (13) | 110.5 | 106.7 | 217.2 | +3.8 | 69% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (25) | 107.3 | 112.3 | 219.6 | -5.0 | 32% |
| Season at home (11) | 109.8 | 108.4 | 218.2 | +1.5 | 55% |
| Season away (14) | 105.4 | 115.4 | 220.7 | -10.0 | 14% |
| Last 10 (10) | 107.2 | 111.9 | 219.1 | -4.7 | 20% |
| Last 5 (5) | 98.8 | 111.0 | 209.8 | -12.2 | 0% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (20) | 104.5 | 111.8 | 216.3 | -7.2 | 25% |
| vs Similar (9) | 116.2 | 114.9 | 231.1 | +1.3 | 56% |
| vs Weaker (1) | 122.0 | 111.0 | 233.0 | +11.0 | 100% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 53.4 | 54.1 | 107.5 | -0.7 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 55.9 | 55.4 | 111.4 | +0.5 | 50% | - |
| Last 30 away (16) | 51.2 | 52.9 | 104.1 | -1.7 | 31% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 52.3 | 53.7 | 106.0 | -1.4 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 50.0 | 55.8 | 105.8 | -5.8 | 20% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar (17) | 52.2 | 53.6 | 105.8 | -1.4 | 35% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (13) | 55.0 | 54.7 | 109.7 | +0.3 | 46% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 56.1 | 56.4 | 112.5 | -0.2 | 43% | - |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 56.7 | 54.4 | 111.1 | +2.3 | 43% | - |
| Last 30 away (16) | 55.6 | 58.1 | 113.7 | -2.4 | 44% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 57.5 | 57.3 | 114.8 | +0.2 | 40% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 52.4 | 57.2 | 109.6 | -4.8 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (20) | 54.8 | 57.8 | 112.5 | -3.0 | 35% | - |
| vs Similar (9) | 58.6 | 54.0 | 112.6 | +4.6 | 56% | - |
| vs Weaker (1) | 62.0 | 49.0 | 111.0 | +13.0 | 100% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 10/12/16 | Osceola Magic v Texas Legends | 101-111 |
| 30/12/15 | Osceola Magic v Texas Legends | 125-120 OT |
| 30/12/14 | Osceola Magic v Texas Legends | 96-108 |
| 20/02/14 | Osceola Magic v Texas Legends | 116-114 |
| 22/12/13 | Osceola Magic v Texas Legends | 118-127 OT |
| 21/12/13 | Osceola Magic v Texas Legends | 104-101 |
| 12/03/13 | Osceola Magic v Texas Legends | 97-106 |
| 03/02/13 | Texas Legends v Osceola Magic | 92-93 |
| 11/01/13 | Osceola Magic v Texas Legends | 86-83 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/01/19 | A | Delaware Blue Coats | 96-101 |
| 06/01/19 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 117-113 |
| 05/01/19 | A | Greensboro Swarm | 117-107 |
| 29/12/18 | A | Erie BayHawks | 120-132 |
| 28/12/18 | A | Raptors 905 | 111-122 |
| 21/12/18 | A | Santa Cruz Warriors | 105-92 |
| 19/12/18 | H | Maine Red Claws | 109-102 |
| 16/12/18 | H | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 118-98 |
| 12/12/18 | H | Westchester | 115-91 |
| 09/12/18 | H | Long Island Nets | 111-125 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/19 | A | Capital City Go-Go | 105-114 |
| 06/01/19 | H | Santa Cruz Warriors | 116-121 |
| 30/12/18 | H | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 79-108 |
| 28/12/18 | A | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 92-101 |
| 22/12/18 | H | Raptors 905 | 102-111 |
| 20/12/18 | A | Erie BayHawks | 107-124 |
| 16/12/18 | H | Delaware Blue Coats | 110-95 |
| 15/12/18 | H | Austin Toros Spurs | 137-110 |
| 13/12/18 | A | Grand Rapids Drive | 99-101 |
| 11/12/18 | A | Memphis Hustle | 125-134 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLWWL | 55% |
| Home | LWWWW | 64% |
| Away | WLLWL | 45% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 22 | 11 | 11 |
| Win % | 55% | 64% | 45% |
| Points / game | 108.1 | 108.5 | 107.7 |
| Allowed / game | 107.5 | 105.6 | 109.3 |
| Point differential | +0.6 | +2.8 | -1.5 |
| Avg total | 215.5 | 214.1 | 217.0 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 36% | 36% | 36% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 67% (3) | 100% (2) | 0% (1) |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLLLL | 32% |
| Home | WWLLL | 55% |
| Away | LLLLL | 14% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 25 | 11 | 14 |
| Win % | 32% | 55% | 14% |
| Points / game | 107.3 | 109.8 | 105.4 |
| Allowed / game | 112.3 | 108.4 | 115.4 |
| Point differential | -5.0 | +1.5 | -10.0 |
| Avg total | 219.6 | 218.2 | 220.7 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 12% | 27% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 50% (6) | 67% (3) | 33% (3) |
| Overtime % | 4% | 9% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 26 | 20 | 6 | 77% | 113.8 | 106.9 | +6.9 |
| 2 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 24 | 18 | 6 | 75% | 104.5 | 99.6 | +5.0 |
| 3 |  Long Island Nets | 23 | 17 | 6 | 74% | 117.1 | 111.9 | +5.2 |
| 4 |  Sioux Falls Skyforce | 26 | 17 | 9 | 65% | 116.2 | 110.1 | +6.1 |
| 5 |  Westchester | 25 | 16 | 9 | 64% | 106.4 | 101.4 | +4.9 |
| 6 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 23 | 14 | 9 | 61% | 107.4 | 106.0 | +1.5 |
| 7 |  Capital City Go-Go | 22 | 13 | 9 | 59% | 112.5 | 110.1 | +2.3 |
| 8 |  Memphis Hustle | 24 | 14 | 10 | 58% | 114.2 | 107.8 | +6.4 |
| 9 |  Raptors 905 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 58% | 111.8 | 109.0 | +2.8 |
| 10 |  Stockton Kings | 21 | 12 | 9 | 57% | 107.8 | 106.7 | +1.1 |
| 11 |  San Diego Clippers | 22 | 12 | 10 | 55% | 111.3 | 109.6 | +1.7 |
| 12 | Osceola Magic | 22 | 12 | 10 | 55% | 108.1 | 107.5 | +0.6 |
| 13 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 23 | 12 | 11 | 52% | 107.9 | 106.7 | +1.2 |
| 14 |  IPFW | 23 | 12 | 11 | 52% | 109.1 | 109.3 | -0.2 |
| 15 |  Windy City Bulls | 25 | 13 | 12 | 52% | 101.1 | 102.7 | -1.6 |
| 16 |  Erie BayHawks | 22 | 11 | 11 | 50% | 120.7 | 117.1 | +3.6 |
| 17 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 25 | 12 | 13 | 48% | 104.4 | 107.8 | -3.4 |
| 18 |  Greensboro Swarm | 24 | 11 | 13 | 46% | 109.5 | 111.2 | -1.7 |
| 19 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 23 | 10 | 13 | 43% | 111.5 | 112.3 | -0.8 |
| 20 |  Grand Rapids Drive | 23 | 10 | 13 | 43% | 105.2 | 108.0 | -2.7 |
| 21 |  South Bay Lakers | 24 | 10 | 14 | 42% | 106.7 | 112.2 | -5.5 |
| 22 |  Canton Charge | 22 | 8 | 14 | 36% | 105.8 | 108.0 | -2.1 |
| 23 |  Iowa Wolves | 25 | 9 | 16 | 36% | 108.1 | 112.4 | -4.3 |
| 24 |  Maine Red Claws | 24 | 8 | 16 | 33% | 105.7 | 108.5 | -2.8 |
| 25 | Texas Legends | 25 | 8 | 17 | 32% | 107.3 | 112.3 | -5.0 |
| 26 |  Wisconsin Herd | 23 | 4 | 19 | 17% | 109.4 | 118.5 | -9.0 |
| 27 |  Northern Arizona Suns | 27 | 3 | 24 | 11% | 98.9 | 108.1 | -9.2 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osceola Magic | 33 | 22 | 23 | 28 | 106 |
| Texas Legends | 20 | 27 | 27 | 26 | 100 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
