PythiaBasketballBETA
B. Nguyen Quang plays for Hanoi Buffaloes (). This season, every competition, he averages 1.8 points, 0.8 rebounds and 0.5 assists in 7.1 minutes over 13 games, shooting 22% from the field.
Hanoi BuffaloesLast 15 – points for & against, and B. Nguyen Quang's form and points
C. Briggs26.2
M. Allen25.3
M. Jenkins23.5 J. Mvuezolo21.9
J. Scott21.3 H. Thomas21.1 M. Davison20.7 E. Weaver20.7
A. Dakota19.8 M. Gordon18.2 G. Peterson17.6 Khoa Tran Dang17.6 Y. Sakhniuk17.0 R. Monyyong16.7 B. Nguyen16.6 D. Tham16.1 V. Nguyen13.0 B. Vo Kim12.3 T. Dinh Thanh12.1 K. Le Khac Dang9.7 H. Dang Thai9.0 T. Minh7.8 C. Dinh Tien7.6 Q. Huynh Vinh7.0 J. Nguyen7.0 P. Nguyen Hoang6.7 T. Pham Hien6.7 T. Duong Duc6.6 T. Huynh6.2 T. Waale6.0 D. Nguyen Tien5.8 A. Nguyen Duong Quang5.5 T. Kok5.3 A. Du Minh5.1 T. Truong Hoang4.6 H. Nguyen Huy4.4 K. Nguyen Anh3.9 Q. Pham Nhat3.8 H. Tran Minh3.6 M. Trieu Han3.5 R. Monyyong14.8 M. Jenkins14.7 Y. Sakhniuk14.1 D. Tham12.5 H. Thomas12.3 M. Davison12.1 C. Briggs11.9 M. Allen11.9 V. Nguyen10.7 M. Gordon9.7 J. Scott9.5 J. Mvuezolo8.4 E. Weaver8.2 B. Nguyen6.8 A. Dakota6.2 T. Dinh Thanh6.1 G. Peterson5.5 T. Pham Hien5.4 Khoa Tran Dang5.2 T. Waale4.9 H. Dang Thai4.8 T. Kok4.7 K. Le Khac Dang4.4 C. Dinh Tien4.0 H. Tran Minh4.0 P. Nguyen Hoang3.6 T. Mai Phuoc3.4 A. Nguyen Duong Quang3.4 A. Du Minh3.3 M. Trieu Han2.7 T. Duong Duc2.6 T. Huynh2.5 T. Son Minh2.5 B. Vo Kim2.4 K. Nguyen Anh2.4 K. Bui Anh2.3 Q. Huynh Vinh2.1 T. Huynh Thanh2.0 T. Truong Hoang2.0 J. Nguyen1.9 G. Peterson7.9 B. Nguyen6.9 E. Weaver6.4 Khoa Tran Dang5.9 Y. Sakhniuk5.9 D. Tham4.1 A. Dakota4.1 A. Du Minh3.6 M. Davison3.6 C. Briggs3.5 J. Scott3.3 H. Thomas3.1 M. Gordon2.9 M. Allen2.8 P. Nguyen Hoang2.6 T. Truong Hoang2.6 T. Huynh2.5 T. Huynh Thanh2.5 C. Dinh Tien2.5 H. Dang Thai2.3 Q. Huynh Vinh2.2 R. Monyyong2.1 K. Le Khac Dang2.1 T. Kok2.0 Q. Pham Nhat1.9 H. Nguyen Huy1.9 J. Mvuezolo1.9 T. Dinh Thanh1.7 V. Nguyen1.6 T. Pham Hien1.6 A. Nguyen Duong Quang1.4 B. Vo Kim1.4 M. Trieu Han1.4 K. To Ngoc1.3 J. Nguyen1.3 M. Jenkins1.1 T. Waale1.0 Q. Le Hoang0.9 D. Nguyen Tien0.9 T. Duong Duc0.9 E. Weaver2.9 B. Vo Kim2.8 J. Mvuezolo2.6 A. Dakota2.4 T. Dinh Thanh2.3 B. Nguyen2.1 Khoa Tran Dang1.8 J. Nguyen1.8 T. Minh1.7 V. Nguyen1.7 G. Peterson1.6 D. Nguyen Tien1.5 M. Gordon1.5 T. Duong Duc1.4 Q. Huynh Vinh1.3 H. Thomas1.3 C. Briggs1.2 M. Allen1.2 A. Du Minh1.2 K. Le Khac Dang1.2 J. Scott1.1 C. Dinh Tien1.1 T. Truong Hoang1.0 A. Nguyen Duong Quang1.0 P. Nguyen Hoang1.0 M. Davison0.8 T. Pham Hien0.8 T. Hoang0.7 H. Nguyen Huy0.7 A. Nguyen Tuan0.7 T. Huynh0.7 H. Dang Thai0.6 H. Vo Huy0.5 B. Nguyen Quang0.5 M. Trieu Han0.5 T. Nguyen Thanh0.5 T. Son Minh0.5 V. Nguyen Phuc0.5 Q. Le Hoang0.4 Q. Pham Nhat0.4 M. Jenkins60.3% Y. Sakhniuk58.6% R. Monyyong58.5% J. Scott52.7% D. Tham51.9% M. Allen50.2% C. Nguyen Albert49.0% T. Waale47.2% M. Davison46.7% E. Weaver45.6% C. Briggs45.3% H. Dang Thai45.0% V. Nguyen44.2% C. Dinh Tien43.8% M. Gordon43.8% K. To Ngoc43.3% Khoa Tran Dang43.2% J. Mvuezolo43.1% H. Thomas42.5% A. Dakota41.1% G. Peterson40.5% T. Dinh Thanh39.6% D. Nguyen Tien37.8% H. Nguyen Huy37.7% A. Du Minh37.6% T. Kok37.2% H. Tran Minh36.9% B. Vo Kim36.6% T. Hoang36.4% B. Nguyen35.4% K. Le Khac Dang35.0% M. Trieu Han34.8% T. Truong Hoang34.7% T. Huynh34.5% T. Pham Hien34.4% A. Nguyen Duong Quang34.4% K. Nguyen Anh34.3% V. Nguyen Phuc33.3% Q. Le Hoang33.3% A. Nguyen Tuan33.3% Y. Sakhniuk62.5% R. Monyyong60.9% J. Scott60.4% M. Jenkins60.3% E. Weaver59.9% C. Dinh Tien57.1% M. Gordon55.1% D. Tham54.1% A. Dakota53.9% M. Allen53.3% T. Dinh Thanh53.0% Khoa Tran Dang51.8% V. Nguyen51.5% C. Nguyen Albert51.1% M. Davison51.1% C. Briggs50.7% H. Dang Thai50.0% B. Vo Kim50.0% T. Waale50.0% J. Mvuezolo49.8% T. Pham Hien49.1% H. Thomas48.7% H. Nguyen Huy48.1% D. Nguyen Tien48.0% G. Peterson47.0% K. Nguyen Anh46.2% K. To Ngoc46.2% D. Tan Hai45.8% K. Le Khac Dang45.8% M. Trieu Han45.5% T. Huynh45.1% A. Du Minh43.2% A. Nguyen Duong Quang42.3% T. Kok41.4% H. Tran Minh40.7% B. Nguyen40.3% T. Minh40.0% Q. Huynh Vinh39.7% K. Bui Anh39.3% T. Duong Duc38.8% T. Hoang35.7% T. Truong Hoang35.6% M. Allen35.2% A. Du Minh35.0% D. Nguyen Tien34.9% V. Nguyen33.6% V. Nguyen Phuc33.3% T. Dinh Thanh32.9% J. Mvuezolo32.9% E. Weaver32.7% B. Vo Kim32.1% Q. Le Hoang32.0% J. Nguyen31.9% T. Nguyen Thanh31.6% C. Dinh Tien31.3% H. Dang Thai30.8% B. Nguyen29.8% H. Nguyen Huy29.4% Khoa Tran Dang29.0% G. Peterson28.6% A. Nguyen Duong Quang28.6% Q. Huynh Vinh28.2% J. Scott28.1% T. Minh28.0% A. Nguyen Tuan28.0% H. Vo Huy27.9% M. Davison27.8% A. Dakota27.5% T. Duong Duc27.5% P. Nguyen Hoang26.3% D. Tham26.1% C. Briggs25.0% M. Gordon25.0% M. Trieu Han25.0% T. Kok25.0% H. Thomas24.5% K. Le Khac Dang24.4% B. Nguyen Quang24.1% M. Chi Anh23.1% T. Pham Hien21.5% Q. Pham Nhat90.0% T. Dinh Thanh86.0% J. Nguyen84.6% K. Le Khac Dang84.2% K. Nguyen Anh80.0% A. Nguyen Tuan78.6% B. Nguyen76.6% G. Peterson76.2% B. Vo Kim75.9% E. Weaver75.7% H. Tran Minh72.7% M. Gordon71.4% V. Nguyen71.4% P. Nguyen Hoang70.8% Q. Huynh Vinh68.8% C. Dinh Tien65.4% A. Dakota64.3% T. Truong Hoang64.3% M. Davison63.9% J. Mvuezolo63.1% T. Duong Duc62.5% R. Monyyong62.0% M. Allen61.9% D. Tham61.6% H. Dang Thai60.9% H. Vo Huy60.0% T. Waale59.0% J. Scott58.7% T. Minh57.9% T. Pham Hien55.0% H. Thomas53.8% C. Briggs53.5% T. Kok51.9% Khoa Tran Dang51.1% T. Huynh50.0% M. Jenkins48.3% A. Nguyen Duong Quang46.7% T. Huynh Thanh41.2% A. Du Minh40.0% Y. Sakhniuk31.4%| Split | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | PRA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All games | 13 | 7.1 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 3.1 | 22% |
| Home | 5 | 9.2 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 23% |
| Away | 8 | 5.8 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 21% |
| Bench | 13 | 7.1 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 3.1 | 22% |
| Team won | 5 | 4.9 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 14% |
| Team lost | 8 | 8.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 24% |
| vs stronger teams | 4 | 5.5 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 38% |
| vs similar teams | 8 | 8.6 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 18% |
| vs weaker teams | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - |
| Metric | 2024 n=13 | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Points / game | 1.8 | – |
| Rebounds / game | 0.8 | – |
| Assists / game | 0.5 | – |
| Threes / game | 0.5 | – |
| Minutes / game | 7.1 | – |
| FG% | 22% | – |
| 3P% | 24% | – |
| FT% | 0% | – |
| Game score / 36 | 2.4 | – |
| Player | GP | Starts | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | PRA | TS% | 3PM · 3P% | Usage | Team pts share | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFEric Frederick | 5 | 5 | 36.7 | 24.0 | 9.6 | 3.6 | 37.2 | 59% | 1.2 · 17% | 27% | 7% | – |
| HTH. Thomas | 20 | 20 | 33.8 | 21.1 | 12.3 | 3.1 | 36.6 | 47% | 1.3 · 25% | 32% | 24% | – |
| GPG. Peterson | 16 | 16 | 36.6 | 17.6 | 5.5 | 7.9 | 31.1 | 50% | 1.6 · 29% | 23% | 16% | – |
| RMR. Monyyong | 15 | 15 | 32.2 | 16.7 | 14.8 | 2.1 | 33.6 | 60% | 0.0 · - | 20% | 14% | – |
| DPD. Peterson | 2 | 2 | 33.4 | 14.0 | 5.0 | 11.0 | 30.0 | 49% | 1.0 · - | 20% | 2% | – |
| CDC. Dinh Tien | 20 | 20 | 30.2 | 7.6 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 14.1 | 54% | 1.1 · 31% | 11% | 9% | – |
| JNJ. Nguyen | 21 | 5 | 16.1 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 10.1 | 47% | 1.8 · 32% | 22% | 8% | – |
| DND. Nguyen Tien | 20 | 15 | 21.3 | 5.8 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 8.2 | 51% | 1.5 · 35% | 13% | 7% | – |
| HNH. Nguyen Huy | 14 | 2 | 11.9 | 4.4 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 7.2 | 48% | 0.7 · 29% | 19% | 4% | – |
| CNC. Nguyen Albert | 19 | 1 | 7.8 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 4.6 | 47% | 0.1 · - | 18% | 3% | – |
| BNB. Nguyen Quang | 13 | 0 | 7.1 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 3.1 | 30% | 0.5 · 24% | 19% | 1% | – |
| KTK. To Ngoc | 18 | 2 | 8.8 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 3.7 | 44% | 0.1 · - | 10% | 2% | – |
| QDQ. Dinh Toan | 9 | 0 | 5.6 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 31% | 0.0 · - | 23% | 1% | – |
| KPK. Pham Duc | 20 | 2 | 7.9 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 29% | 0.0 · - | 12% | 1% | – |
| TVT. Vuong Quoc | 5 | 0 | 4.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.2 | - | 0.0 · - | 11% | 0% | – |
| HVH. Vu Viet | 9 | 0 | 4.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 9% | 0.0 · - | 14% | 0% | – |
| Date | Opponent | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P | FT | Game score /36 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Sep 24 | | @ Can Tho Catfish | L 74-81 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2.5 |
| 11 Sep 24 | | v Can Tho Catfish | L 60-82 | 25 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3/14 | 2/11 | 0/0 | -0.1 |
| 03 Sep 24 | | v Nhatrang Dolphins | L 72-100 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0.0 |
| 29 Aug 24 | | @ Can Tho Catfish | W 89-82 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0.0 |
| 18 Aug 24 | | v Da Nang Dragons | W 91-82 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2.5 |
| 16 Aug 24 | | v Da Nang Dragons | L 60-88 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1/6 | 1/5 | 0/2 | 4.4 |
| 01 Aug 24 | | v Saigon Heat | L 72-95 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 9.7 |
| 09 Jul 24 | | @ Da Nang Dragons | W 78-69 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/0 | -2.2 |
| 03 Jul 24 | | @ Can Tho Catfish | L 68-74 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | -2.5 |
| 30 Jun 24 | | @ Saigon Heat | L 84-87 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 0/2 | 4.3 |
| 26 Jun 24 | | @ Nhatrang Dolphins | L 81-113 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 6.5 |
| 23 Jun 24 | | @ Da Nang Dragons | W 98-89 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1/4 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 2.5 |
| 20 Jun 24 | | @ Ho Chi Minh City Wings | W 102-91 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3.6 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.