PythiaBasketballBETA
T. Tang Minh plays for Can Tho Catfish (). This season, every competition, he averages 1.6 points, 2.1 rebounds and 0.8 assists in 12.4 minutes over 14 games, shooting 38% from the field.
Can Tho CatfishLast 15 – points for & against, and T. Tang Minh's form and points
K. Barkley28.6
J. Smith28.3
A. January25.8
S. Swint24.1 B. Griffin23.9
Marrow Jr. Jermaine22.7 John Fields22.6
M. Gibbs21.6 J. Holder20.9 D. Tham19.8 R. Sampson19.6 Y. Sakhniuk17.6 H. Thomas16.8 U. Osakue16.0 M. Soy15.9 V. Nguyen13.3 W. Tran13.0 V. Nguyen Quang12.4 B. Vo Kim11.2 T. Dinh Thanh10.4 K. Nguyen Anh8.9 C. Dinh Tien8.6 D. Nguyen Tien8.2 T. Le Ngoc7.8 Q. Huynh Vinh7.7 J. Young7.3 T. Tran Van7.1 T. Pham Hien6.9 T. Waale6.8 A. Du Minh6.7 T. Le Hieu6.1 H. Dang Thai6.0 H. Vo Huy5.6 A. Nguyen Tuan5.6 H. Le Tran Dang5.4 T. Duong Duc5.3 T. Truong Hoang5.2 T. Son Minh5.1 K. Le Khac Dang4.7 H. Nguyen Huy4.7 John Fields16.5 A. January15.7 K. Barkley15.2 R. Sampson14.2 Y. Sakhniuk12.3 D. Tham11.4 U. Osakue10.4 V. Nguyen9.7 J. Smith9.4 H. Thomas8.7 B. Griffin7.2 S. Swint6.9 M. Gibbs6.8 Marrow Jr. Jermaine6.4 J. Holder6.1 J. Young5.7 T. Dinh Thanh5.5 V. Nguyen Quang4.9 W. Tran4.4 T. Waale4.2 K. Nguyen Anh4.0 M. Soy4.0 H. Dang Thai3.9 K. Le Khac Dang3.7 V. Nguyen Phuc3.2 T. Pham Hien3.2 T. Le Ngoc3.1 H. Nguyen Quang3.1 T. Andre3.0 T. Duong Duc2.9 T. Tran Van2.9 A. Du Minh2.7 K. Pham Duc2.6 T. Truong Hoang2.6 M. Trieu Han2.6 D. Truong Van2.5 H. Nguyen Van2.3 T. Son Minh2.2 C. Dinh Tien2.2 D. Tan Hai2.2 M. Gibbs8.2 K. Barkley6.8 B. Griffin6.1 U. Osakue6.0 S. Swint5.4 J. Smith5.3 Y. Sakhniuk4.5 Marrow Jr. Jermaine3.6 V. Nguyen Quang3.6 H. Thomas3.4 D. Tham3.1 K. Nguyen Anh3.1 M. Soy3.1 A. January2.8 John Fields2.6 V. Nguyen2.5 H. Nguyen Huy2.5 J. Holder2.4 T. Dinh Thanh2.4 A. Du Minh2.3 J. Young2.3 D. Tan Hai2.2 Q. Huynh Vinh2.1 T. Truong Hoang2.1 R. Sampson1.9 C. Dinh Tien1.9 T. Le Hieu1.8 D. Nguyen Tien1.8 T. Waale1.7 T. Duong Duc1.7 T. Hoang1.6 B. Vo Kim1.5 W. Tran1.4 T. Huynh Thanh1.4 H. Vo Huy1.3 T. Pham Hien1.3 T. Nguyen Dinh Quang1.3 M. Trieu Han1.3 Q. Pham Nhat1.2 T. Tran Van1.2 Marrow Jr. Jermaine3.1 M. Soy3.0 B. Vo Kim2.9 H. Thomas2.4 M. Gibbs2.4 J. Holder2.3 S. Swint2.3 R. Sampson2.2 V. Nguyen1.9 V. Nguyen Quang1.9 Q. Huynh Vinh1.8 K. Barkley1.8 A. Du Minh1.6 T. Tran Van1.6 A. January1.6 B. Griffin1.4 H. Vo Huy1.3 W. Tran1.3 T. Le Hieu1.3 T. Son Minh1.3 D. Nguyen Tien1.2 T. Truong Hoang1.2 J. Smith1.2 H. Le Tran Dang1.1 T. Duong Duc1.1 T. Dinh Thanh1.0 A. Nguyen Tuan1.0 K. Nguyen Anh0.9 T. Hoang0.9 H. Nguyen Huy0.8 U. Osakue0.8 T. Pham Hien0.8 T. Le Ngoc0.8 C. Dinh Tien0.7 A. Sundberg0.7 P. Nguyen Hoang0.6 M. Trieu Han0.6 T. Nguyen Thanh0.6 T. Mai Phuoc0.6 S. D. Kaillum0.6 John Fields70.3% J. Smith58.0% C. Dinh Tien55.9% D. Tham55.9% K. Barkley55.6% Y. Sakhniuk52.8% H. Nguyen Van52.7% S. D. Kaillum51.1% M. Trieu Han47.4% J. Holder45.5% T. Mai Phuoc45.2% T. Waale45.1% R. Sampson45.0% V. Nguyen44.7% H. Dang Thai44.3% Q. Le43.9% T. Pham Hien43.8% T. Le Ngoc43.8% T. Dinh Thanh43.6% M. Gibbs43.6% T. Tran Van43.2% B. Vo Kim43.0% T. Andre42.9% W. Tran42.1% T. Huynh Thanh41.9% U. Osakue41.7% S. Swint41.4% A. January41.4% H. Thomas41.3% B. Griffin41.2% Marrow Jr. Jermaine40.3% M. Soy39.8% T. Son Minh39.3% K. Nguyen Anh39.2% H. Vu Viet37.7% A. Du Minh37.5% D. Tan Hai37.5% V. Nguyen Quang37.4% J. Young37.0% Q. Huynh Vinh36.9% John Fields70.4% S. D. Kaillum69.6% C. Dinh Tien68.4% R. Sampson64.4% K. Barkley63.6% Y. Sakhniuk60.8% J. Smith60.2% D. Tham57.9% D. Truong Van55.0% H. Dang Thai54.8% H. Nguyen Van54.7% J. Holder52.9% T. Pham Hien52.8% Q. Le52.4% K. Nguyen Anh52.3% M. Gibbs51.9% T. Waale50.8% M. Trieu Han50.0% B. Griffin49.4% Marrow Jr. Jermaine49.4% V. Nguyen48.8% T. Mai Phuoc48.6% D. Nguyen Tien48.6% T. Duong Duc48.5% V. Nguyen Phuc48.4% W. Tran48.3% T. Dinh Thanh48.1% T. Tran Van48.1% H. Thomas47.5% T. Le Ngoc47.4% B. Vo Kim46.9% T. Le Hieu46.7% U. Osakue46.2% H. Tran Minh45.8% T. Andre45.7% S. Swint45.2% K. Le Khac Dang44.6% P. Nguyen Hoang43.8% H. Vu Viet43.8% H. Hoang The43.5% J. Smith44.7% M. Trieu Han44.0% B. Vo Kim42.0% T. Tran Van41.0% T. Mai Phuoc40.0% V. Nguyen39.4% A. Du Minh38.6% M. Soy38.4% T. Le Ngoc35.3% T. Son Minh35.1% T. Dinh Thanh35.1% J. Holder35.0% Q. Le35.0% Q. Huynh Vinh34.7% H. Thomas34.0% T. Truong Hoang33.9% A. January33.7% K. Barkley33.7% C. Dinh Tien33.3% S. D. Kaillum33.3% S. Swint33.3% V. Nguyen Quang33.0% T. Pham Hien32.1% W. Tran32.0% D. Tham31.6% M. Gibbs31.5% H. Vu Viet31.0% Marrow Jr. Jermaine31.0% T. Le Hieu30.0% P. Nguyen Hoang30.0% H. Vo Huy30.0% H. Le Tran Dang28.1% A. Nguyen Tuan26.9% R. Sampson26.5% T. Duong Duc26.4% D. Nguyen Tien26.0% H. Nguyen Huy25.4% T. Hoang25.4% U. Osakue24.4% H. Tu Duong24.0% T. Truong Hoang88.2% V. Nguyen Quang86.0% S. Swint83.1% T. Le Ngoc82.4% W. Tran79.3% A. Nguyen Tuan77.8% J. Smith77.7% T. Dinh Thanh77.6% H. Nguyen Huy75.0% Q. Pham Nhat72.7% D. Nguyen Tien72.4% A. January71.9% V. Nguyen71.9% K. Barkley71.8% B. Vo Kim71.4% A. Du Minh70.8% J. Holder70.0% M. Soy69.4% T. Hoang69.2% C. Dinh Tien69.2% Marrow Jr. Jermaine69.0% M. Gibbs68.2% T. Tran Van66.7% H. Le Tran Dang66.7% H. Dang Thai65.0% T. Pham Hien64.3% B. Griffin64.2% K. Le Khac Dang63.6% D. Tan Hai63.6% T. Andre61.5% Q. Huynh Vinh60.0% D. Tham59.5% T. Mai Phuoc58.8% U. Osakue58.5% H. Vo Huy58.3% H. Tu Duong58.3% H. Thomas56.7% John Fields53.8% Y. Sakhniuk53.5% T. Waale50.0%| Split | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | PRA | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All games | 14 | 12.4 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 4.4 | 38% |
| Home | 7 | 13.0 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 4.4 | 29% |
| Away | 7 | 11.8 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 4.4 | 50% |
| Starter | 3 | 15.8 | 1.3 | 3.7 | 0.7 | 5.7 | 33% |
| Bench | 11 | 11.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 4.1 | 39% |
| Team won | 5 | 15.7 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 5.2 | 42% |
| Team lost | 9 | 10.6 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 4.0 | 33% |
| vs stronger teams | 8 | 12.2 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 0.5 | 4.1 | 29% |
| vs similar teams | 3 | 13.3 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 4.3 | 33% |
| vs weaker teams | 3 | 12.1 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 5.3 | 75% |
| Metric | 2023 n=14 | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Points / game | 1.6 | – |
| Rebounds / game | 2.1 | – |
| Assists / game | 0.8 | – |
| Threes / game | 0.2 | – |
| Minutes / game | 12.4 | – |
| FG% | 38% | – |
| 3P% | 25% | – |
| FT% | 50% | – |
| Game score / 36 | 5.6 | – |
| Player | GP | Starts | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | PRA | TS% | 3PM · 3P% | Usage | Team pts share | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGB. Griffin | 12 | 12 | 37.5 | 23.9 | 7.2 | 6.1 | 37.2 | 49% | 1.4 · 23% | 31% | 23% | – |
| MJM. Jakongmee | 3 | 3 | 38.5 | 23.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 37.0 | 51% | 2.3 · 27% | 28% | 6% | – |
| JKJ. Keyes | 7 | 7 | 37.1 | 21.0 | 12.3 | 4.0 | 37.3 | 50% | 0.7 · 15% | 27% | 12% | – |
| HDH. De Angelo | 8 | 8 | 35.7 | 16.5 | 13.0 | 2.2 | 31.8 | 50% | 0.5 · 15% | 22% | 11% | – |
| MSM. Soy | 16 | 16 | 35.3 | 15.9 | 4.0 | 3.1 | 22.9 | 53% | 3.0 · 38% | 20% | 20% | – |
| TLT. Le Ngoc | 16 | 9 | 21.9 | 7.8 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 11.9 | 52% | 0.8 · 35% | 16% | 10% | – |
| KLK. Le Khac Dang | 16 | 5 | 15.1 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 0.7 | 9.1 | 41% | 0.1 · 6% | 18% | 6% | – |
| HNH. Nguyen Quang | 11 | 7 | 13.5 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 6.9 | 36% | 0.1 · - | 15% | 3% | – |
| TNT. Nguyen Hoang | 14 | 0 | 7.6 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 4.9 | 62% | 0.4 · 43% | 14% | 3% | – |
| THT. Huynh Thanh | 14 | 4 | 9.8 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 4.5 | 52% | 0.4 · 23% | 11% | 3% | – |
| TTTrung To Quang | 11 | 0 | 8.6 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 3.4 | 35% | 0.4 · 18% | 15% | 2% | – |
| TTT. Tang Minh | 14 | 3 | 12.4 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 4.4 | 44% | 0.2 · 25% | 7% | 2% | – |
| DND. Nguyen Lam Ang | 10 | 5 | 9.0 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 43% | 0.0 · - | 7% | 1% | – |
| VNV. Nguyen Ha | 6 | 0 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.8 | - | 0.0 · - | 7% | 0% | – |
| TBT. Bui Quoc | 6 | 0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | - | 0.0 · - | 5% | - | – |
| Date | Opponent | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P | FT | Game score /36 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 23 | | @ Nhatrang Dolphins | L 70-77 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1.1 |
| 25 Aug 23 | | v Hanoi Buffaloes | W 70-59 | 21 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0/3 | 0/0 | 0/0 | -0.7 |
| 18 Aug 23 | | v Da Nang Dragons | W 97-88 | 17 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 5.8 |
| 12 Aug 23 | | @ Hanoi Buffaloes | L 81-95 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1.8 |
| 09 Aug 23 | | @ Da Nang Dragons | W 99-80 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 7.9 |
| 01 Aug 23 | | @ Thang Long Warriors | L 86-94 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1.8 |
| 23 Jul 23 | | v Nhatrang Dolphins | L 78-80 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 5.4 |
| 15 Jul 23 | | v Saigon Heat | L 72-79 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/0 | -4.5 |
| 30 Jun 23 | | v Saigon Heat | L 83-89 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 0/0 | 13.4 |
| 27 Jun 23 | | @ Ho Chi Minh City Wings | W 78-66 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2/5 | 0/1 | 1/2 | 5.6 |
| 23 Jun 23 | | @ Thang Long Warriors | L 78-83 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 5.2 |
| 20 Jun 23 | | v Da Nang Dragons | W 89-87 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2/2 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 16.7 |
| 16 Jun 23 | | v Nhatrang Dolphins | L 87-96 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 4.1 |
| 13 Jun 23 | | @ Hanoi Buffaloes | L 72-86 | 19 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 2/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 14.7 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.