Randers hosts Team FOG Naestved on 12 November 2026 in the Basketligaen, and the Pythia model names the unbeaten Naestved as the clear favourite, a rating driven by their 10-0 season record, 100.5 points scored per game and only 70.1 points allowed. Randers, 6-3 overall, averages 95.3 points and concedes 86.2, with a 3-1 home record and 100.8 points per game at home. Naestved's road form is flawless, 5-0 with 103.8 points per game and 67.8 allowed, and their last five games were all victories, including a 113-80 win over Bears Academy. The teams are even in head-to-head history, 5-5, though Randers last defeated Naestved 122-94 in April. Pythia projects a 23% chance for Randers to win against a 77% chance for Naestved, with a 86-94 scoreline and 180.6 total points. The home line is 5.0, and the model gives a 37% probability that Randers covers, while the over line of 181.5 carries a 47% chance; an overtime scenario has a 4% likelihood.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (9) | 95.3 | 86.2 | 181.6 | +9.1 | 67% |
| Season at home (4) | 100.8 | 80.0 | 180.8 | +20.8 | 75% |
| Season away (5) | 91.0 | 91.2 | 182.2 | -0.2 | 60% |
| Last 10 (10) | 95.5 | 83.9 | 179.4 | +11.6 | 70% |
| Last 5 (5) | 93.8 | 87.6 | 181.4 | +6.2 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (8) | 86.0 | 92.9 | 178.9 | -6.9 | 38% |
| vs Similar (8) | 91.6 | 93.1 | 184.8 | -1.5 | 38% |
| vs Weaker (14) | 99.0 | 80.1 | 179.1 | +18.9 | 93% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (10) | 100.5 | 70.1 | 170.6 | +30.4 | 100% |
| Season at home (5) | 97.2 | 72.4 | 169.6 | +24.8 | 100% |
| Season away (5) | 103.8 | 67.8 | 171.6 | +36.0 | 100% |
| Last 10 (10) | 100.5 | 70.1 | 170.6 | +30.4 | 100% |
| Last 5 (5) | 98.8 | 73.6 | 172.4 | +25.2 | 100% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (7) | 85.9 | 97.3 | 183.1 | -11.4 | 29% |
| vs Similar (9) | 91.8 | 89.7 | 181.4 | +2.1 | 78% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (14) | 101.7 | 78.1 | 179.8 | +23.6 | 93% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 89.75 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 47.4 | 42.5 | 89.9 | +4.9 | 67% | 57% |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 50.4 | 42.6 | 93.1 | +7.8 | 79% | 64% |
| Last 30 away (16) | 44.7 | 42.4 | 87.1 | +2.3 | 56% | 50% |
| Last 10 (10) | 46.3 | 40.5 | 86.8 | +5.8 | 50% | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 48.6 | 42.6 | 91.2 | +6.0 | 60% | 80% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (8) | 43.5 | 49.1 | 92.6 | -5.6 | 50% | 62% |
| vs Similar (8) | 46.5 | 42.9 | 89.4 | +3.6 | 50% | 50% |
| vs Weaker (14) | 50.1 | 38.5 | 88.6 | +11.6 | 86% | 57% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 89.75 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 46.7 | 43.4 | 90.1 | +3.3 | 57% | 57% |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 47.6 | 44.2 | 91.8 | +3.4 | 56% | 62% |
| Last 30 away (14) | 45.7 | 42.5 | 88.2 | +3.2 | 57% | 50% |
| Last 10 (10) | 50.7 | 32.8 | 83.5 | +17.9 | 100% | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 45.6 | 34.8 | 80.4 | +10.8 | 100% | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (7) | 41.1 | 51.4 | 92.6 | -10.3 | 14% | 57% |
| vs Similar (9) | 43.8 | 47.6 | 91.3 | -3.8 | 44% | 56% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (14) | 51.4 | 36.7 | 88.1 | +14.7 | 86% | 57% |
| Pick | Probability | Avg odds | Best 1 | Best 2 | Best 3 | Best 4 | Best 5 | Edge | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team FOG Naestved -2 | 74.0% | 1.55 | 1.55 | - | - | - | - | +14.2pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved +3.5 | 83.9% | 1.32 | 1.32 | - | - | - | - | +14.1pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved +2.5 | 82.0% | 1.31 | 1.31 | - | - | - | - | +12.0pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved -1.5 | 74.9% | 1.47 | 1.54 | 1.45 | 1.41 | - | - | +11.9pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved win | 77.2% | 1.39 | 1.44 | 1.41 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.40 | +11.6pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved +1.5 | 79.1% | 1.35 | 1.35 | - | - | - | - | +11.3pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved -2.5 | 71.2% | 1.51 | 1.60 | 1.52 | 1.42 | - | - | +10.8pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved +6.5 | 89.5% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +10.7pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved (regulation) | 74.8% | 1.42 | 1.44 | 1.41 | 1.41 | - | - | +10.6pp | Lost |
| Randers under 97.5 | 86.3% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | +10.2pp | Lost |
| Randers under 95.5 | 82.0% | 1.29 | 1.29 | - | - | - | - | +10.1pp | Lost |
| Randers under 99.5 | 89.9% | 1.15 | 1.15 | - | - | - | - | +9.3pp | Won |
| Team FOG Naestved -3 | 70.4% | 1.57 | 1.64 | 1.51 | - | - | - | +9.1pp | Lost |
| Randers under 92.5 | 73.7% | 1.39 | 1.43 | 1.42 | 1.32 | - | - | +8.8pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved +10.5 | 94.3% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | +8.8pp | Lost |
| Randers under 98.5 | 88.2% | 1.16 | 1.16 | - | - | - | - | +8.7pp | Won |
| Randers under 93.5 | 76.7% | 1.33 | 1.40 | 1.27 | - | - | - | +8.7pp | Lost |
| Randers under 94.5 | 79.4% | 1.31 | 1.31 | - | - | - | - | +8.5pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved +15.5 | 97.5% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +8.1pp | Won |
| Randers under 96.5 | 84.3% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | +8.1pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved over 84.5 | 83.8% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | +7.7pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved over 82.5 | 88.2% | 1.15 | 1.15 | - | - | - | - | +7.7pp | Won |
| Team FOG Naestved over 87.5 | 75.6% | 1.30 | 1.30 | - | - | - | - | +7.6pp | Lost |
| Randers under 91.5 | 70.6% | 1.45 | 1.54 | 1.45 | 1.37 | - | - | +7.3pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved over 83.5 | 86.1% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +7.3pp | Won |
| Randers under 100.5 | 91.3% | 1.11 | 1.11 | - | - | - | - | +6.9pp | Won |
| Team FOG Naestved over 81.5 | 90.0% | 1.12 | 1.12 | - | - | - | - | +6.9pp | Won |
| Team FOG Naestved over 88.5 | 72.4% | 1.38 | 1.40 | 1.35 | - | - | - | +6.8pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved over 76.5 | 96.1% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +6.7pp | Won |
| Team FOG Naestved over 74.5 | 97.5% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +6.7pp | Won |
| Team FOG Naestved over 78.5 | 94.2% | 1.07 | 1.07 | - | - | - | - | +6.7pp | Won |
| Team FOG Naestved +20.5 | 98.9% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +6.7pp | Won |
| Team FOG Naestved over 86.5 | 78.6% | 1.29 | 1.29 | - | - | - | - | +6.7pp | Lost |
| Team FOG Naestved over 75.5 | 96.9% | 1.03 | 1.03 | - | - | - | - | +6.6pp | Won |
| Team FOG Naestved over 80.5 | 91.6% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | +6.6pp | Won |
| Team FOG Naestved over 77.5 | 95.2% | 1.05 | 1.05 | - | - | - | - | +6.5pp | Won |
| Team FOG Naestved over 73.5 | 98.0% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +6.5pp | Won |
| Team FOG Naestved over 79.5 | 93.0% | 1.08 | 1.08 | - | - | - | - | +6.4pp | Won |
| Team FOG Naestved over 72.5 | 98.4% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +6.2pp | Won |
| Under 191.5 | 75.1% | 1.32 | 1.32 | - | - | - | - | +4.6pp | Won |
| Under 196.5 | 83.4% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +4.5pp | Won |
| Overtime: no | 96.0% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +4.3pp | Won |
| Over 156.5 | 92.8% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +3.4pp | Won |
| Randers over 71.5 | 92.2% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +2.8pp | Won |
| Randers +24.5 | 91.7% | 1.05 | 1.05 | - | - | - | - | +2.7pp | Won |
| Randers over 72.5 | 90.6% | 1.06 | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | +2.7pp | Won |
| Over 161.5 | 87.5% | 1.09 | 1.09 | - | - | - | - | +1.4pp | Won |
| Randers over 73.5 | 88.9% | 1.07 | 1.07 | - | - | - | - | +1.4pp | Won |
| Randers over 74.5 | 86.9% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | +1.4pp | Won |
| Over 166.5 | 80.0% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +1.1pp | Won |
| Randers over 76.5 | 82.2% | 1.14 | 1.14 | - | - | - | - | +0.7pp | Won |
| Randers over 75.5 | 84.6% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | -0.4pp | Won |
| Over 171.5 | 70.3% | 1.31 | 1.31 | - | - | - | - | -0.6pp | Won |
| Randers +19.5 | 83.5% | 1.11 | 1.11 | - | - | - | - | -0.8pp | Won |
| Randers over 77.5 | 79.5% | 1.15 | 1.15 | - | - | - | - | -1.0pp | Won |
| Randers over 78.5 | 76.6% | 1.20 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | -1.2pp | Won |
| Randers +14.5 | 70.7% | 1.27 | 1.31 | 1.23 | - | - | - | -1.9pp | Won |
| Randers over 80.5 | 70.1% | 1.28 | 1.28 | - | - | - | - | -2.3pp | Won |
| Randers over 79.5 | 73.4% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | -2.8pp | Won |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Shot type | Attempts per game | Made per game | Accuracy (made ÷ attempts) | League accuracy | Points per game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏀🏀 2-pointers | 40.8 | 23.3 | 55.2% | 46.6 | |
| 🏀🏀🏀 3-pointers | 27.9 | 10.0 | 31.2% | 30.0 | |
| 🏀 Free throws | 22.9 | 18.5 | 68.0% | 18.5 |
| Shot type | Attempts per game | Made per game | Accuracy (made ÷ attempts) | League accuracy | Points per game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏀🏀 2-pointers | 49.1 | 30.1 | 55.2% | 60.2 | |
| 🏀🏀🏀 3-pointers | 25.3 | 7.1 | 31.2% | 21.3 | |
| 🏀 Free throws | 25.1 | 17.9 | 68.0% | 17.9 |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 02/04/26 | Randers v Team FOG Naestved | 122-94 |
| 16/03/26 | Team FOG Naestved v Randers | 105-104 |
| 08/02/26 | Randers v Team FOG Naestved | 98-116 |
| 09/10/25 | Team FOG Naestved v Randers | 101-90 |
| 27/03/25 | Randers v Team FOG Naestved | 96-81 |
| 10/03/25 | Team FOG Naestved v Randers | 101-102 OT |
| 28/12/24 | Randers v Team FOG Naestved | 100-82 |
| 15/12/24 | Team FOG Naestved v Randers | 68-82 |
| 03/10/24 | Team FOG Naestved v Randers | 114-109 OT |
| 08/04/24 | Randers v Team FOG Naestved | 86-101 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/26 | A | Copenhagen | 96-90 |
| 30/10/26 | H | Gladsaxe | 110-80 |
| 23/10/26 | A | Horsens | 84-94 |
| 18/10/26 | H | BMS Herlev | 93-71 |
| 10/10/26 | A | Bakken Bears | 86-103 |
| 03/10/26 | H | Bears Academy | 117-73 |
| 27/09/26 | A | Vaerlose | 89-85 OT |
| 23/09/26 | H | Svendborg | 83-96 |
| 17/09/26 | A | Holbaek-Stenhus | 100-84 |
| 20/04/26 | H | Copenhagen | 97-63 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/11/26 | H | Bakken Bears | 80-77 |
| 04/11/26 | A | Vaerlose | 95-62 |
| 28/10/26 | H | Bears Academy | 113-80 |
| 24/10/26 | A | Gladsaxe | 99-67 |
| 19/10/26 | A | Vejen | 107-82 |
| 15/10/26 | H | Svendborg | 86-83 |
| 10/10/26 | A | BMS Herlev | 117-55 |
| 30/09/26 | H | Copenhagen | 90-66 |
| 27/09/26 | A | Horsens | 101-73 |
| 24/09/26 | H | Holbaek-Stenhus | 117-56 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LWLWW | 67% |
| Home | LWWW | 75% |
| Away | WWLLW | 60% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 9 | 4 | 5 |
| Win % | 67% | 75% | 60% |
| Points / game | 95.3 | 100.8 | 91.0 |
| Allowed / game | 86.2 | 80.0 | 91.2 |
| Point differential | +9.1 | +20.8 | -0.2 |
| Avg total | 181.6 | 180.8 | 182.2 |
| Over 180.25 | 56% | 50% | 60% |
| Win by 10+ | 44% | 75% | 20% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 100% (1) | - | 100% (1) |
| Overtime % | 11% | 0% | 20% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WWWWW | 100% |
| Home | WWWWW | 100% |
| Away | WWWWW | 100% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Win % | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Points / game | 100.5 | 97.2 | 103.8 |
| Allowed / game | 70.1 | 72.4 | 67.8 |
| Point differential | +30.4 | +24.8 | +36.0 |
| Avg total | 170.6 | 169.6 | 171.6 |
| Over 180.25 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Win by 10+ | 80% | 60% | 100% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 100% (2) | 100% (2) | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 100% | 100.5 | 70.1 | +30.4 | |
| 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 88% | 102.0 | 76.6 | +25.4 | |
| 3 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 80% | 89.2 | 77.6 | +11.6 | |
| 4 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 78% | 90.6 | 79.9 | +10.7 | |
| 5 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 67% | 95.3 | 86.2 | +9.1 | |
| 6 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 56% | 84.0 | 81.6 | +2.4 | |
| 7 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40% | 77.1 | 87.4 | -10.3 | |
| 8 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33% | 80.9 | 93.6 | -12.7 | |
| 9 | Gladsaxe | 10 | 3 | 7 | 30% | 79.4 | 88.9 | -9.5 |
| 10 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20% | 78.0 | 91.7 | -13.7 | |
| 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10% | 78.8 | 92.6 | -13.8 | |
| 12 | BMS Herlev | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10% | 74.0 | 97.6 | -23.6 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 23 | 28 | 23 | 98 | |
| 25 | 19 | 14 | 26 | 84 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.