PythiaBasketballBETA
NBA - G League
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (33) | 111.2 | 107.8 | 219.0 | +3.3 | 61% |
| Season at home (17) | 111.2 | 103.8 | 215.1 | +7.4 | 71% |
| Season away (16) | 111.1 | 112.1 | 223.2 | -1.1 | 50% |
| Last 10 (10) | 111.5 | 108.4 | 219.9 | +3.1 | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 104.8 | 101.6 | 206.4 | +3.2 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar (15) | 111.0 | 111.6 | 222.6 | -0.6 | 47% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (15) | 111.5 | 101.7 | 213.1 | +9.8 | 80% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (36) | 106.7 | 112.8 | 219.5 | -6.0 | 28% |
| Season at home (20) | 109.8 | 117.0 | 226.8 | -7.2 | 20% |
| Season away (16) | 102.9 | 107.4 | 210.3 | -4.6 | 38% |
| Last 10 (10) | 105.7 | 114.8 | 220.5 | -9.1 | 30% |
| Last 5 (5) | 103.6 | 108.2 | 211.8 | -4.6 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (19) | 103.6 | 113.0 | 216.6 | -9.4 | 21% |
| vs Similar (11) | 108.8 | 110.1 | 218.9 | -1.3 | 36% |
| vs Weaker | no games | ||||
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 57.3 | 53.7 | 111.0 | +3.6 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 56.1 | 47.7 | 103.8 | +8.4 | 75% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 58.7 | 60.5 | 119.2 | -1.8 | 43% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 57.0 | 57.0 | 114.0 | +0.0 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 56.2 | 50.8 | 107.0 | +5.4 | 80% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar (15) | 57.3 | 58.2 | 115.5 | -0.9 | 47% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (15) | 57.3 | 49.1 | 106.4 | +8.1 | 73% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 52.2 | 55.7 | 107.9 | -3.5 | 23% | - |
| Last 30 at home (18) | 53.7 | 57.0 | 110.7 | -3.3 | 17% | - |
| Last 30 away (12) | 50.1 | 53.8 | 103.8 | -3.7 | 33% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 52.0 | 56.2 | 108.2 | -4.2 | 20% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 55.2 | 54.6 | 109.8 | +0.6 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (19) | 50.4 | 56.9 | 107.3 | -6.5 | 16% | - |
| vs Similar (11) | 55.4 | 53.6 | 109.0 | +1.7 | 36% | - |
| vs Weaker | no games | |||||
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 04/02/23 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Birmingham Squadron | 106-99 |
| 24/03/22 | Birmingham Squadron v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 136-95 |
| 23/03/22 | Birmingham Squadron v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 129-143 |
| 06/02/22 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Birmingham Squadron | 111-104 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/02/23 | H | Birmingham Squadron | 106-99 |
| 01/02/23 | H | Texas Legends | 105-93 |
| 25/01/23 | H | Austin Toros Spurs | 92-87 |
| 20/01/23 | H | Osceola Magic | 121-125 |
| 18/01/23 | H | Osceola Magic | 100-104 |
| 15/01/23 | H | Raptors 905 | 123-126 OT |
| 14/01/23 | A | Santa Cruz Warriors | 129-110 |
| 13/01/23 | A | Santa Cruz Warriors | 103-126 |
| 10/01/23 | A | Stockton Kings | 112-104 |
| 08/01/23 | A | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 124-110 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/02/23 | A | Sioux Falls Skyforce | 99-106 |
| 02/02/23 | H | Delaware Blue Coats | 102-124 |
| 28/01/23 | A | Maine Celtics | 113-106 |
| 27/01/23 | A | Raptors 905 | 115-95 |
| 25/01/23 | A | Raptors 905 | 89-110 |
| 23/01/23 | H | Stockton Kings | 104-122 |
| 22/01/23 | H | Stockton Kings | 112-111 |
| 18/01/23 | H | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 105-132 |
| 15/01/23 | H | Salt Lake City Stars | 108-110 |
| 14/01/23 | H | Salt Lake City Stars | 110-132 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLWWW | 61% |
| Home | LLWWW | 71% |
| Away | WWWLW | 50% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 33 | 17 | 16 |
| Win % | 61% | 71% | 50% |
| Points / game | 111.2 | 111.2 | 111.1 |
| Allowed / game | 107.8 | 103.8 | 112.1 |
| Point differential | +3.3 | +7.4 | -1.1 |
| Avg total | 219.0 | 215.1 | 223.2 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 36% | 41% | 31% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 40% (10) | 43% (7) | 33% (3) |
| Overtime % | 3% | 6% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LWWLL | 28% |
| Home | LLWLL | 20% |
| Away | LLWWL | 38% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 36 | 20 | 16 |
| Win % | 28% | 20% | 38% |
| Points / game | 106.7 | 109.8 | 102.9 |
| Allowed / game | 112.8 | 117.0 | 107.4 |
| Point differential | -6.0 | -7.2 | -4.6 |
| Avg total | 219.5 | 226.8 | 210.3 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 8% | 5% | 12% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 40% (10) | 38% (8) | 50% (2) |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  South Bay Lakers | 32 | 22 | 10 | 69% | 119.8 | 111.8 | +8.0 |
| 2 |  Long Island Nets | 35 | 24 | 11 | 69% | 113.3 | 109.0 | +4.3 |
| 3 |  Mexico City Capitanes | 35 | 24 | 11 | 69% | 114.3 | 111.0 | +3.3 |
| 4 |  Cleveland Charge | 31 | 21 | 10 | 68% | 111.2 | 110.1 | +1.1 |
| 5 | Ontario Clippers | 36 | 24 | 12 | 67% | 112.2 | 107.2 | +5.0 |
| 6 |  IPFW | 32 | 21 | 11 | 66% | 122.8 | 117.8 | +5.0 |
| 7 |  Memphis Hustle | 33 | 21 | 12 | 64% | 115.4 | 114.6 | +0.8 |
| 8 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 36 | 22 | 14 | 61% | 117.4 | 113.9 | +3.4 |
| 9 |  Stockton Kings | 33 | 20 | 13 | 61% | 112.7 | 108.2 | +4.5 |
| 10 | Sioux Falls Skyforce | 33 | 20 | 13 | 61% | 111.2 | 107.8 | +3.3 |
| 11 |  Maine Celtics | 34 | 20 | 14 | 59% | 118.0 | 113.5 | +4.5 |
| 12 |  College Park Skyhawks | 33 | 19 | 14 | 58% | 118.6 | 114.1 | +4.5 |
| 13 |  Windy City Bulls | 33 | 18 | 15 | 55% | 114.2 | 111.1 | +3.0 |
| 14 |  Capital City Go-Go | 35 | 19 | 16 | 54% | 112.0 | 111.0 | +1.0 |
| 15 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 32 | 17 | 15 | 53% | 119.6 | 119.9 | -0.2 |
| 16 |  Raptors 905 | 31 | 15 | 16 | 48% | 115.7 | 116.6 | -0.9 |
| 17 |  Iowa Wolves | 32 | 15 | 17 | 47% | 117.5 | 118.4 | -0.9 |
| 18 |  Osceola Magic | 35 | 16 | 19 | 46% | 114.9 | 115.5 | -0.6 |
| 19 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 34 | 15 | 19 | 44% | 111.0 | 113.2 | -2.2 |
| 20 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 32 | 14 | 18 | 44% | 114.9 | 118.5 | -3.6 |
| 21 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 35 | 15 | 20 | 43% | 114.7 | 115.5 | -0.8 |
| 22 |  Texas Legends | 32 | 13 | 19 | 41% | 116.6 | 119.6 | -2.9 |
| 23 |  Westchester | 31 | 12 | 19 | 39% | 110.3 | 111.2 | -0.9 |
| 24 |  Wisconsin Herd | 34 | 13 | 21 | 38% | 113.1 | 118.6 | -5.5 |
| 25 |  Greensboro Swarm | 32 | 12 | 20 | 38% | 110.1 | 113.6 | -3.5 |
| 26 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 33 | 10 | 23 | 30% | 106.2 | 111.6 | -5.4 |
| 27 | G League Ignite | 33 | 10 | 23 | 30% | 108.6 | 115.1 | -6.5 |
| 28 | Birmingham Squadron | 36 | 10 | 26 | 28% | 106.7 | 112.8 | -6.0 |
| 29 |  Motor City Cruise | 33 | 9 | 24 | 27% | 109.3 | 114.6 | -5.2 |
| 30 |  Grand Rapids Gold | 34 | 9 | 25 | 26% | 106.0 | 112.9 | -6.9 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sioux Falls Skyforce | 33 | 25 | 34 | 28 | 120 |
| Birmingham Squadron | 28 | 32 | 18 | 33 | 111 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
