PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (35) | 114.1 | 115.1 | 229.2 | -1.0 | 51% |
| Season at home (20) | 110.4 | 112.2 | 222.7 | -1.8 | 50% |
| Season away (15) | 119.1 | 118.9 | 237.9 | +0.2 | 53% |
| Last 10 (10) | 116.6 | 114.8 | 231.4 | +1.8 | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 124.4 | 118.6 | 243.0 | +5.8 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (1) | 108.0 | 107.0 | 215.0 | +1.0 | 100% |
| vs Similar ◀ (24) | 114.2 | 117.2 | 231.4 | -3.0 | 42% |
| vs Weaker (5) | 115.4 | 109.8 | 225.2 | +5.6 | 80% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (35) | 115.6 | 112.0 | 227.7 | +3.6 | 57% |
| Season at home (20) | 115.5 | 110.5 | 226.1 | +5.0 | 60% |
| Season away (15) | 115.7 | 114.1 | 229.8 | +1.7 | 53% |
| Last 10 (10) | 115.8 | 115.5 | 231.3 | +0.3 | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 112.2 | 117.2 | 229.4 | -5.0 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar ◀ (21) | 115.2 | 114.0 | 229.2 | +1.3 | 52% |
| vs Weaker (9) | 120.1 | 109.4 | 229.6 | +10.7 | 78% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 57.1 | 57.3 | 114.4 | -0.2 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 at home (17) | 56.1 | 58.3 | 114.4 | -2.2 | 35% | - |
| Last 30 away (13) | 58.4 | 56.1 | 114.5 | +2.3 | 46% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 58.2 | 55.9 | 114.1 | +2.3 | 40% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 59.8 | 60.6 | 120.4 | -0.8 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (1) | 56.0 | 58.0 | 114.0 | -2.0 | 0% | - |
| vs Similar ◀ (24) | 57.1 | 58.2 | 115.3 | -1.2 | 38% | - |
| vs Weaker (5) | 57.4 | 52.8 | 110.2 | +4.6 | 60% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 58.9 | 56.1 | 115.1 | +2.8 | 53% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 60.2 | 56.1 | 116.3 | +4.2 | 62% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 57.4 | 56.2 | 113.6 | +1.2 | 43% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 58.9 | 55.2 | 114.1 | +3.7 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 58.0 | 55.8 | 113.8 | +2.2 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar ◀ (21) | 58.0 | 57.7 | 115.8 | +0.3 | 43% | - |
| vs Weaker (9) | 61.0 | 52.4 | 113.4 | +8.6 | 78% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 10/02/18 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Stockton Kings | 129-104 |
| 21/12/17 | Stockton Kings v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 127-98 |
| 15/03/17 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Stockton Kings | 115-134 |
| 26/01/17 | Stockton Kings v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 129-116 |
| 19/01/17 | Stockton Kings v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 105-114 |
| 15/01/17 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Stockton Kings | 134-121 |
| 26/03/15 | Stockton Kings v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 118-121 |
| 25/02/15 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Stockton Kings | 141-128 |
| 24/11/13 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Stockton Kings | 103-73 |
| 23/11/13 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Stockton Kings | 86-85 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/02/18 | H | Stockton Kings | 129-104 |
| 03/02/18 | H | Oklahoma City Blue | 127-118 |
| 30/01/18 | H | Iowa Wolves | 101-112 |
| 28/01/18 | A | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 147-133 |
| 26/01/18 | A | Texas Legends | 118-126 |
| 21/01/18 | A | Canton Charge | 103-100 |
| 20/01/18 | A | IPFW | 130-131 |
| 18/01/18 | H | Salt Lake City Stars | 112-108 |
| 13/01/18 | H | Raptors 905 | 108-107 OT |
| 12/01/18 | H | Windy City Bulls | 91-109 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/02/18 | A | Sioux Falls Skyforce | 104-129 |
| 08/02/18 | H | South Bay Lakers | 113-110 |
| 06/02/18 | H | Texas Legends | 155-141 |
| 03/02/18 | H | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 99-109 |
| 30/01/18 | H | Austin Toros Spurs | 90-97 |
| 28/01/18 | H | Northern Arizona Suns | 142-121 |
| 24/01/18 | A | Texas Legends | 109-122 |
| 21/01/18 | A | Iowa Wolves | 119-108 |
| 20/01/18 | A | Oklahoma City Blue | 110-106 |
| 18/01/18 | A | Santa Cruz Warriors | 117-112 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LWLWW | 51% |
| Home | WWLWW | 50% |
| Away | WLWLW | 53% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 35 | 20 | 15 |
| Win % | 51% | 50% | 53% |
| Points / game | 114.1 | 110.4 | 119.1 |
| Allowed / game | 115.1 | 112.2 | 118.9 |
| Point differential | -1.0 | -1.9 | +0.2 |
| Avg total | 229.2 | 222.7 | 237.9 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 69% (13) | 80% (5) | 62% (8) |
| Overtime % | 9% | 10% | 7% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLWWL | 57% |
| Home | WLLWW | 60% |
| Away | WWWLL | 53% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 35 | 20 | 15 |
| Win % | 57% | 60% | 53% |
| Points / game | 115.6 | 115.5 | 115.7 |
| Allowed / game | 112.0 | 110.5 | 114.1 |
| Point differential | +3.6 | +5.0 | +1.7 |
| Avg total | 227.7 | 226.1 | 229.8 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 31% | 30% | 33% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 88% (8) | 80% (5) | 100% (3) |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Westchester | 39 | 25 | 14 | 64% | 106.2 | 102.4 | +3.8 |
| 2 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 36 | 23 | 13 | 64% | 107.1 | 102.2 | +4.9 |
| 3 |  South Bay Lakers | 35 | 22 | 13 | 63% | 116.1 | 112.8 | +3.3 |
| 4 |  Raptors 905 | 36 | 22 | 14 | 61% | 101.4 | 96.6 | +4.8 |
| 5 |  Texas Legends | 37 | 22 | 15 | 59% | 118.7 | 115.3 | +3.4 |
| 6 |  IPFW | 36 | 21 | 15 | 58% | 110.7 | 108.0 | +2.7 |
| 7 | Stockton Kings | 35 | 20 | 15 | 57% | 115.6 | 112.0 | +3.6 |
| 8 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 38 | 21 | 17 | 55% | 121.0 | 117.7 | +3.3 |
| 9 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 35 | 19 | 16 | 54% | 110.3 | 109.8 | +0.5 |
| 10 |  Iowa Wolves | 35 | 19 | 16 | 54% | 107.4 | 107.8 | -0.4 |
| 11 |  Long Island Nets | 35 | 19 | 16 | 54% | 103.1 | 104.7 | -1.7 |
| 12 |  Erie BayHawks | 37 | 20 | 17 | 54% | 107.5 | 106.6 | +0.9 |
| 13 |  Osceola Magic | 35 | 18 | 17 | 51% | 102.5 | 102.9 | -0.4 |
| 14 | Sioux Falls Skyforce | 35 | 18 | 17 | 51% | 114.1 | 115.1 | -1.0 |
| 15 |  Grand Rapids Drive | 37 | 19 | 18 | 51% | 104.1 | 102.6 | +1.5 |
| 16 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 36 | 18 | 18 | 50% | 110.8 | 107.9 | +2.9 |
| 17 |  San Diego Clippers | 38 | 18 | 20 | 47% | 104.6 | 109.9 | -5.3 |
| 18 |  Wisconsin Herd | 36 | 17 | 19 | 47% | 106.7 | 111.5 | -4.8 |
| 19 |  Northern Arizona Suns | 35 | 16 | 19 | 46% | 117.7 | 116.1 | +1.5 |
| 20 |  Maine Red Claws | 36 | 16 | 20 | 44% | 108.7 | 110.5 | -1.8 |
| 21 |  Windy City Bulls | 34 | 14 | 20 | 41% | 109.0 | 108.3 | +0.6 |
| 22 |  Memphis Hustle | 37 | 15 | 22 | 41% | 112.7 | 115.1 | -2.4 |
| 23 |  Canton Charge | 35 | 13 | 22 | 37% | 103.1 | 108.6 | -5.5 |
| 24 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 35 | 11 | 24 | 31% | 107.8 | 111.4 | -3.6 |
| 25 |  Greensboro Swarm | 35 | 11 | 24 | 31% | 104.0 | 108.2 | -4.2 |
| 26 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 38 | 11 | 27 | 29% | 102.8 | 109.7 | -6.9 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sioux Falls Skyforce | 36 | 25 | 19 | 30 | 110 |
| Stockton Kings | 16 | 28 | 23 | 26 | 93 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
