PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (45) | 110.1 | 115.4 | 225.5 | -5.3 | 33% |
| Season at home (22) | 113.4 | 112.8 | 226.1 | +0.6 | 59% |
| Season away (23) | 107.0 | 117.9 | 224.9 | -10.9 | 9% |
| Last 10 (10) | 108.3 | 121.0 | 229.3 | -12.7 | 20% |
| Last 5 (5) | 108.2 | 119.8 | 228.0 | -11.6 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (20) | 109.1 | 116.0 | 225.1 | -6.9 | 20% |
| vs Similar (10) | 116.2 | 118.6 | 234.8 | -2.4 | 50% |
| vs Weaker | no games | ||||
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (44) | 113.3 | 109.0 | 222.2 | +4.3 | 66% |
| Season at home (21) | 111.0 | 107.1 | 218.1 | +3.8 | 67% |
| Season away (23) | 115.4 | 110.6 | 226.0 | +4.8 | 65% |
| Last 10 (10) | 114.1 | 114.7 | 228.8 | -0.6 | 40% |
| Last 5 (5) | 118.2 | 111.8 | 230.0 | +6.4 | 80% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar (13) | 114.2 | 111.9 | 226.2 | +2.3 | 62% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (17) | 109.3 | 108.2 | 217.5 | +1.1 | 59% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 53.9 | 57.3 | 111.2 | -3.3 | 43% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 54.0 | 55.0 | 109.0 | -1.0 | 50% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 53.9 | 59.9 | 113.7 | -6.0 | 36% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 47.6 | 59.0 | 106.6 | -11.4 | 30% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 51.0 | 58.2 | 109.2 | -7.2 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (20) | 55.0 | 58.2 | 113.2 | -3.2 | 45% | - |
| vs Similar (10) | 51.9 | 55.4 | 107.3 | -3.5 | 40% | - |
| vs Weaker | no games | |||||
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 55.0 | 55.4 | 110.4 | -0.4 | 53% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 51.6 | 53.6 | 105.2 | -1.9 | 44% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 58.9 | 57.5 | 116.4 | +1.4 | 64% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 56.9 | 58.2 | 115.1 | -1.3 | 60% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 54.0 | 56.4 | 110.4 | -2.4 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar (13) | 55.4 | 56.1 | 111.5 | -0.7 | 54% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (17) | 54.7 | 54.9 | 109.6 | -0.2 | 53% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 17/11/18 | Texas Legends v Oklahoma City Blue | 108-105 |
| 11/11/18 | Oklahoma City Blue v Texas Legends | 121-103 |
| 10/03/18 | Oklahoma City Blue v Texas Legends | 118-97 |
| 16/12/17 | Texas Legends v Oklahoma City Blue | 118-116 |
| 19/11/17 | Texas Legends v Oklahoma City Blue | 129-123 |
| 15/11/17 | Oklahoma City Blue v Texas Legends | 122-118 |
| 02/04/17 | Oklahoma City Blue v Texas Legends | 115-96 |
| 25/02/17 | Texas Legends v Oklahoma City Blue | 106-121 |
| 04/02/17 | Texas Legends v Oklahoma City Blue | 128-101 |
| 03/12/16 | Oklahoma City Blue v Texas Legends | 107-110 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/19 | A | Northern Arizona Suns | 105-135 |
| 09/03/19 | A | Salt Lake City Stars | 100-128 |
| 03/03/19 | H | Sioux Falls Skyforce | 110-95 |
| 01/03/19 | A | San Diego Clippers | 117-125 |
| 27/02/19 | A | Stockton Kings | 109-116 |
| 24/02/19 | H | Iowa Wolves | 101-122 |
| 21/02/19 | A | Iowa Wolves | 111-121 |
| 14/02/19 | H | South Bay Lakers | 122-105 |
| 10/02/19 | H | Memphis Hustle | 94-115 |
| 03/02/19 | H | South Bay Lakers | 114-148 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/19 | H | Stockton Kings | 123-120 OT |
| 03/03/19 | H | Northern Arizona Suns | 116-93 |
| 02/03/19 | A | Northern Arizona Suns | 127-113 |
| 27/02/19 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 111-109 |
| 25/02/19 | A | Santa Cruz Warriors | 114-124 |
| 23/02/19 | A | Stockton Kings | 105-110 |
| 21/02/19 | H | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 120-122 OT |
| 10/02/19 | H | South Bay Lakers | 110-113 |
| 09/02/19 | A | Austin Toros Spurs | 109-111 |
| 05/02/19 | A | Iowa Wolves | 106-132 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLWLL | 33% |
| Home | LLWLW | 59% |
| Away | LLLLL | 9% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 45 | 22 | 23 |
| Win % | 33% | 59% | 9% |
| Points / game | 110.1 | 113.4 | 107.0 |
| Allowed / game | 115.4 | 112.8 | 117.9 |
| Point differential | -5.3 | +0.6 | -10.9 |
| Avg total | 225.5 | 226.1 | 224.9 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 16% | 32% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 50% (10) | 80% (5) | 20% (5) |
| Overtime % | 2% | 5% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LWWWW | 66% |
| Home | LLWWW | 67% |
| Away | LLLLW | 65% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 44 | 21 | 23 |
| Win % | 66% | 67% | 65% |
| Points / game | 113.3 | 111.0 | 115.4 |
| Allowed / game | 109.0 | 107.1 | 110.6 |
| Point differential | +4.3 | +3.8 | +4.8 |
| Avg total | 222.2 | 218.1 | 226.0 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 36% | 29% | 43% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 54% (13) | 71% (7) | 33% (6) |
| Overtime % | 5% | 10% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 44 | 30 | 14 | 68% | 104.9 | 100.7 | +4.2 |
| 2 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 47 | 32 | 15 | 68% | 114.2 | 109.9 | +4.3 |
| 3 |  Long Island Nets | 45 | 30 | 15 | 67% | 117.0 | 112.9 | +4.1 |
| 4 | Oklahoma City Blue | 44 | 29 | 15 | 66% | 113.3 | 109.0 | +4.3 |
| 5 |  Osceola Magic | 45 | 28 | 17 | 62% | 109.5 | 107.0 | +2.5 |
| 6 |  Raptors 905 | 46 | 28 | 18 | 61% | 112.5 | 108.0 | +4.4 |
| 7 |  Stockton Kings | 46 | 28 | 18 | 61% | 111.4 | 109.8 | +1.6 |
| 8 |  Westchester | 47 | 28 | 19 | 60% | 108.4 | 104.8 | +3.6 |
| 9 |  Windy City Bulls | 45 | 25 | 20 | 56% | 106.3 | 105.0 | +1.4 |
| 10 |  Grand Rapids Drive | 44 | 24 | 20 | 55% | 108.0 | 107.1 | +0.8 |
| 11 |  Memphis Hustle | 46 | 25 | 21 | 54% | 114.0 | 110.5 | +3.6 |
| 12 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 45 | 24 | 21 | 53% | 109.0 | 106.6 | +2.4 |
| 13 |  San Diego Clippers | 44 | 23 | 21 | 52% | 111.8 | 111.8 | +0.0 |
| 14 |  Sioux Falls Skyforce | 45 | 23 | 22 | 51% | 116.1 | 114.7 | +1.4 |
| 15 |  Greensboro Swarm | 44 | 22 | 22 | 50% | 109.5 | 110.3 | -0.8 |
| 16 |  Capital City Go-Go | 46 | 23 | 23 | 50% | 112.2 | 113.8 | -1.6 |
| 17 |  Erie BayHawks | 45 | 21 | 24 | 47% | 117.3 | 115.8 | +1.5 |
| 18 |  IPFW | 45 | 20 | 25 | 44% | 109.8 | 112.0 | -2.2 |
| 19 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 43 | 19 | 24 | 44% | 112.4 | 112.5 | -0.1 |
| 20 |  Maine Red Claws | 44 | 18 | 26 | 41% | 106.4 | 108.6 | -2.2 |
| 21 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 44 | 18 | 26 | 41% | 106.1 | 110.7 | -4.6 |
| 22 |  Canton Charge | 45 | 18 | 27 | 40% | 105.4 | 108.6 | -3.3 |
| 23 |  South Bay Lakers | 45 | 18 | 27 | 40% | 110.3 | 113.8 | -3.6 |
| 24 |  Iowa Wolves | 46 | 17 | 29 | 37% | 112.6 | 114.9 | -2.4 |
| 25 | Texas Legends | 45 | 15 | 30 | 33% | 110.1 | 115.4 | -5.3 |
| 26 |  Northern Arizona Suns | 45 | 11 | 34 | 24% | 102.1 | 108.9 | -6.8 |
| 27 |  Wisconsin Herd | 44 | 10 | 34 | 23% | 108.7 | 116.7 | -8.0 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Legends | 26 | 24 | 28 | 33 | 111 |
| Oklahoma City Blue | 32 | 34 | 29 | 33 | 128 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
