Tianjin faces Zhejiang Guangsha on 3 November 2026 in the CBA, with the model favouring Zhejiang Guangsha and predicting a close contest that will likely tilt in their favour; the projected score is 93-96 and the total 189.0 points. Tianjin's season record is 2-5, with an average of 92.7 points scored and 95.0 allowed, while Zhejiang Guangsha sits at 4-3, averaging 90.6 points scored and 95.9 allowed, placing them 16th and 9th respectively. At home, Tianjin is 2-1, scoring 96.3 and allowing 87.3, whereas Zhejiang Guangsha's road record is 2-2, with 87.0 points scored and 99.0 allowed. In their last five games each, both teams are 2-3, and recent results show Tianjin beat Ningbo Rockets 95-81 at home, then lost to Zhejiang Guangsha 92-95 at home, and lost to Qingdao 90-94 away; Zhejiang Guangsha lost to Beijing 76-114 away, beat Tianjin 95-92 away, and beat Liaoning 90-84 at home. Historically, Zhejiang Guangsha leads the series 8-2 and won the most recent meeting 95-92 on 30 October 2026. The model assigns a 39% chance for Tianjin to win, 61% for Zhejiang Guangsha, a 47% probability that Zhejiang Guangsha will cover the 3.5-point spread, and a 7% chance of overtime.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (7) | 92.7 | 95.0 | 187.7 | -2.3 | 29% |
| Season at home (3) | 96.3 | 87.3 | 183.7 | +9.0 | 67% |
| Season away (4) | 90.0 | 100.8 | 190.8 | -10.8 | 0% |
| Last 10 (10) | 92.3 | 97.0 | 189.3 | -4.7 | 20% |
| Last 5 (5) | 94.4 | 92.2 | 186.6 | +2.2 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (18) | 92.4 | 100.0 | 192.4 | -7.6 | 22% |
| vs Similar ◀ (8) | 96.0 | 99.6 | 195.6 | -3.6 | 25% |
| vs Weaker (4) | 97.8 | 87.0 | 184.8 | +10.8 | 75% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (7) | 90.6 | 95.9 | 186.4 | -5.3 | 57% |
| Season at home (3) | 95.3 | 91.7 | 187.0 | +3.7 | 67% |
| Season away (4) | 87.0 | 99.0 | 186.0 | -12.0 | 50% |
| Last 10 (10) | 89.4 | 97.7 | 187.1 | -8.3 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 84.0 | 93.6 | 177.6 | -9.6 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (9) | 90.9 | 99.9 | 190.8 | -9.0 | 44% |
| vs Similar ◀ (10) | 89.3 | 93.6 | 182.9 | -4.3 | 40% |
| vs Weaker (11) | 94.9 | 85.0 | 179.9 | +9.9 | 82% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 95.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 46.7 | 49.3 | 96.0 | -2.7 | 33% | 53% |
| Last 30 at home (13) | 48.8 | 46.3 | 95.2 | +2.5 | 54% | 46% |
| Last 30 away (17) | 45.0 | 51.6 | 96.6 | -6.6 | 18% | 59% |
| Last 10 (10) | 47.1 | 50.7 | 97.8 | -3.6 | 30% | 70% |
| Last 5 (5) | 46.0 | 45.8 | 91.8 | +0.2 | 60% | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (18) | 45.1 | 50.3 | 95.4 | -5.3 | 22% | 50% |
| vs Similar ◀ (8) | 48.9 | 50.0 | 98.9 | -1.1 | 38% | 75% |
| vs Weaker (4) | 49.5 | 43.5 | 93.0 | +6.0 | 75% | 25% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 95.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 48.0 | 47.9 | 95.8 | +0.1 | 47% | 53% |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 50.6 | 45.5 | 96.1 | +5.1 | 64% | 57% |
| Last 30 away (16) | 45.7 | 49.9 | 95.6 | -4.2 | 31% | 50% |
| Last 10 (10) | 46.1 | 49.2 | 95.3 | -3.1 | 40% | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 43.4 | 47.2 | 90.6 | -3.8 | 60% | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (9) | 48.2 | 50.6 | 98.8 | -2.3 | 22% | 78% |
| vs Similar ◀ (10) | 46.0 | 50.0 | 96.0 | -4.0 | 50% | 30% |
| vs Weaker (11) | 49.5 | 43.7 | 93.3 | +5.8 | 64% | 55% |
| Pick | Probability | Avg odds | Best 1 | Best 2 | Best 3 | Best 4 | Best 5 | Edge | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang Guangsha over 89.5 | 71.6% | 1.42 | 1.42 | - | - | - | - | +10.2pp | Won |
| Zhejiang Guangsha over 88.5 | 74.4% | 1.36 | 1.36 | - | - | - | - | +10.0pp | Won |
| Zhejiang Guangsha over 87.5 | 77.0% | 1.31 | 1.31 | - | - | - | - | +9.7pp | Won |
| Zhejiang Guangsha over 86.5 | 79.5% | 1.24 | 1.24 | - | - | - | - | +8.9pp | Won |
| Tianjin over 85.5 | 72.4% | 1.34 | 1.34 | - | - | - | - | +6.5pp | Won |
| Tianjin over 84.5 | 75.2% | 1.29 | 1.29 | - | - | - | - | +6.3pp | Won |
| Overtime: no | 93.1% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +1.4pp | - |
| Zhejiang Guangsha +6 | 77.3% | 1.25 | 1.25 | - | - | - | - | - | Won |
| Zhejiang Guangsha +5.5 | 75.2% | 1.28 | 1.28 | - | - | - | - | - | Won |
| Zhejiang Guangsha +5 | 74.5% | 1.26 | 1.26 | - | - | - | - | - | Won |
| Zhejiang Guangsha +4.5 | 72.3% | 1.29 | 1.29 | - | - | - | - | - | Won |
| Over 177.5 | 71.5% | 1.44 | 1.44 | - | - | - | - | - | Won |
| Zhejiang Guangsha +4 | 71.4% | 1.32 | 1.32 | - | - | - | - | - | Won |
| Over 178 | 71.0% | 1.45 | 1.45 | - | - | - | - | - | Won |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Shot type | Attempts per game | Made per game | Accuracy (made ÷ attempts) | League accuracy | Points per game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏀🏀 2-pointers | 36.9 | 20.0 | 53.8% | 40.0 | |
| 🏀🏀🏀 3-pointers | 33.7 | 11.7 | 35.0% | 35.1 | |
| 🏀 Free throws | 23.4 | 17.7 | 74.8% | 17.7 |
| Shot type | Attempts per game | Made per game | Accuracy (made ÷ attempts) | League accuracy | Points per game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏀🏀 2-pointers | 44.5 | 22.9 | 53.8% | 45.8 | |
| 🏀🏀🏀 3-pointers | 26.4 | 9.3 | 35.0% | 27.9 | |
| 🏀 Free throws | 24.0 | 16.9 | 74.8% | 16.9 |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 30/10/26 | Tianjin v Zhejiang Guangsha | 92-95 |
| 24/04/26 | Zhejiang Guangsha v Tianjin | 103-93 |
| 24/03/26 | Tianjin v Zhejiang Guangsha | 95-102 |
| 01/01/26 | Tianjin v Zhejiang Guangsha | 68-102 |
| 20/03/25 | Tianjin v Zhejiang Guangsha | 103-109 |
| 27/10/24 | Zhejiang Guangsha v Tianjin | 107-86 |
| 21/03/24 | Zhejiang Guangsha v Tianjin | 110-101 |
| 15/03/24 | Tianjin v Zhejiang Guangsha | 108-102 |
| 21/12/23 | Zhejiang Guangsha v Tianjin | 129-103 |
| 27/10/23 | Tianjin v Zhejiang Guangsha | 115-102 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/26 | H | Ningbo Rockets | 95-81 |
| 30/10/26 | H | Zhejiang Guangsha | 92-95 |
| 27/10/26 | A | Qingdao | 90-94 |
| 25/10/26 | A | Shandong | 93-105 |
| 23/10/26 | H | Guangzhou | 102-86 |
| 20/10/26 | A | Xinjiang | 92-107 |
| 17/10/26 | A | Sichuan | 85-97 |
| 24/04/26 | A | Zhejiang Guangsha | 93-103 |
| 20/04/26 | A | Zhejiang Chouzhou | 84-96 |
| 17/04/26 | H | Qingdao | 97-106 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLLLW | 29% |
| Home | WLW | 67% |
| Away | LLLL | 0% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 7 | 3 | 4 |
| Win % | 29% | 67% | 0% |
| Points / game | 92.7 | 96.3 | 90.0 |
| Allowed / game | 95.0 | 87.3 | 100.8 |
| Point differential | -2.3 | +9.0 | -10.8 |
| Avg total | 187.7 | 183.7 | 190.8 |
| Over 184 | 57% | 67% | 50% |
| Win by 10+ | 29% | 67% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 0% (2) | 0% (1) | 0% (1) |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLWWL | 57% |
| Home | WLW | 67% |
| Away | WLWL | 50% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 7 | 3 | 4 |
| Win % | 57% | 67% | 50% |
| Points / game | 90.6 | 95.3 | 87.0 |
| Allowed / game | 95.9 | 91.7 | 99.0 |
| Point differential | -5.3 | +3.7 | -12.0 |
| Avg total | 186.4 | 187.0 | 186.0 |
| Over 184 | 57% | 33% | 75% |
| Win by 10+ | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 67% (3) | 0% (1) | 100% (2) |
| Overtime % | 14% | 33% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100% | 105.6 | 78.4 | +27.1 | |
| 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 86% | 97.1 | 86.3 | +10.9 | |
| 3 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 86% | 96.6 | 87.0 | +9.6 | |
| 4 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75% | 99.1 | 83.0 | +16.1 | |
| 5 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71% | 101.0 | 90.9 | +10.1 | |
| 6 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71% | 82.7 | 74.1 | +8.6 | |
| 7 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57% | 91.7 | 88.3 | +3.4 | |
| 8 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57% | 91.0 | 94.4 | -3.4 | |
| 9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57% | 90.6 | 95.9 | -5.3 | |
| 10 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 43% | 83.7 | 83.9 | -0.1 | |
| 11 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 43% | 86.0 | 89.9 | -3.9 | |
| 12 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 43% | 76.7 | 94.4 | -17.7 | |
| 13 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 38% | 88.6 | 90.4 | -1.8 | |
| 14 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 38% | 91.5 | 93.2 | -1.8 | |
| 15 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 38% | 91.8 | 94.2 | -2.5 | |
| 16 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 29% | 92.7 | 95.0 | -2.3 | |
| 17 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 29% | 87.4 | 97.3 | -9.9 | |
| 18 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 29% | 80.6 | 95.6 | -15.0 | |
| 19 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14% | 79.6 | 86.0 | -6.4 | |
| 20 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0% | 77.9 | 95.1 | -17.3 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 23 | 23 | 24 | 88 | |
| 29 | 19 | 22 | 29 | 99 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.