Bucknell faces Akron on 17 November 2026 in the NCAA, with the model designating Akron as the favourite because of its 2-0 record and 93.5 points per game compared with Bucknell's 0-3 record and 63.3 points per game; Akron's 93.5 points scored and 62.5 points allowed per game give it a clear edge. Bucknell has struggled, losing all three games with an average of 63.3 points scored and 91.0 points allowed, and its single home game ended 62-82; its last five games show one win and four losses, including defeats to Virginia 61-95, Old Dominion 62-82, and Maryland 67-96. Akron, meanwhile, has won both games it has played, averaging 93.5 points scored and 62.5 points allowed, and its road record is 1-0 with a 75-61 win; its last five games include four wins and one loss, with a 112-64 victory over Muskingum and a 75-61 win over Louisiana Lafayette, though it fell 71-91 to Texas Tech. Historically, Akron has beaten Bucknell once, 97-77, on 3 December 2025. The model projects a 20% chance for Bucknell to win and an 80% chance for Akron, with a predicted score of 72-82 and a total of 154.4 points; the overtime probability is 4%.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (3) | 63.3 | 91.0 | 154.3 | -27.7 | 0% |
| Season at home (1) | 62.0 | 82.0 | 144.0 | -20.0 | 0% |
| Season away (2) | 64.0 | 95.5 | 159.5 | -31.5 | 0% |
| Last 10 (10) | 66.7 | 79.3 | 146.0 | -12.6 | 20% |
| Last 5 (5) | 64.8 | 80.4 | 145.2 | -15.6 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (22) | 66.9 | 81.0 | 147.9 | -14.1 | 18% |
| vs Similar (8) | 68.9 | 67.5 | 136.4 | +1.4 | 50% |
| vs Weaker | no games | ||||
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (2) | 93.5 | 62.5 | 156.0 | +31.0 | 100% |
| Season at home (1) | 112.0 | 64.0 | 176.0 | +48.0 | 100% |
| Season away (1) | 75.0 | 61.0 | 136.0 | +14.0 | 100% |
| Last 10 (10) | 84.7 | 70.4 | 155.1 | +14.3 | 90% |
| Last 5 (5) | 82.4 | 72.0 | 154.4 | +10.4 | 80% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar (1) | 73.0 | 76.0 | 149.0 | -3.0 | 0% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (27) | 85.1 | 73.8 | 158.9 | +11.3 | 89% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 29.9 | 35.8 | 65.7 | -6.0 | 27% | - |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 29.2 | 33.9 | 63.1 | -4.6 | 29% | - |
| Last 30 away (16) | 30.4 | 37.6 | 68.0 | -7.1 | 25% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 31.4 | 36.6 | 68.0 | -5.2 | 30% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 30.2 | 36.8 | 67.0 | -6.6 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (22) | 29.0 | 37.6 | 66.6 | -8.7 | 14% | - |
| vs Similar (8) | 32.4 | 30.9 | 63.2 | +1.5 | 62% | - |
| vs Weaker | no games | |||||
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 43.1 | 34.1 | 77.2 | +9.0 | 83% | - |
| Last 30 at home (17) | 44.8 | 35.6 | 80.4 | +9.2 | 82% | - |
| Last 30 away (13) | 40.9 | 32.2 | 73.1 | +8.8 | 85% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 42.9 | 32.7 | 75.6 | +10.2 | 80% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 43.0 | 33.2 | 76.2 | +9.8 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar (1) | 36.0 | 33.0 | 69.0 | +3.0 | 100% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (27) | 42.5 | 34.7 | 77.3 | +7.8 | 81% | - |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/11/26 | A | Virginia | 61-95 |
| 07/11/26 | H | Old Dominion | 62-82 |
| 03/11/26 | A | Maryland | 67-96 |
| 06/03/26 | A | Navy | 69-74 |
| 04/03/26 | H | Army | 65-55 |
| 28/02/26 | A | Lehigh | 79-89 |
| 25/02/26 | A | Army | 75-73 |
| 22/02/26 | H | Holy Cross | 63-72 |
| 19/02/26 | H | American University | 57-75 |
| 14/02/26 | A | Boston University | 69-82 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/26 | H | Muskingum | 112-64 |
| 03/11/26 | A | Louisiana Lafayette | 75-61 |
| 20/03/26 | A | Texas Tech | 71-91 |
| 15/03/26 | H | Toledo | 79-76 |
| 13/03/26 | H | Kent State | 75-68 |
| 12/03/26 | H | Buffalo | 73-70 |
| 06/03/26 | H | Northern Illinois | 94-55 |
| 04/03/26 | A | Central Michigan | 77-64 |
| 28/02/26 | A | Kent State | 92-70 |
| 25/02/26 | H | Buffalo | 99-85 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLL | 0% |
| Home | L | 0% |
| Away | LL | 0% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Win % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Points / game | 63.3 | 62.0 | 64.0 |
| Allowed / game | 91.0 | 82.0 | 95.5 |
| Point differential | -27.7 | -20.0 | -31.5 |
| Avg total | 154.3 | 144.0 | 159.5 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WW | 100% |
| Home | W | 100% |
| Away | W | 100% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Win % | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Points / game | 93.5 | 112.0 | 75.0 |
| Allowed / game | 62.5 | 64.0 | 61.0 |
| Point differential | +31.0 | +48.0 | +14.0 |
| Avg total | 156.0 | 176.0 | 136.0 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75% | 72.0 | 68.2 | +3.8 | |
| 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 73.3 | 74.7 | -1.3 | |
| 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60% | 79.8 | 64.4 | +15.4 | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 74.3 | 62.7 | +11.7 | |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 73.7 | 70.7 | +3.0 | |
| 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 64.3 | 73.7 | -9.3 | |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 64.0 | 75.0 | -11.0 | |
| 8 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0% | 69.7 | 85.7 | -16.0 | |
| 9 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0% | 63.3 | 91.0 | -27.7 | |
| 10 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0% | 64.0 | 92.7 | -28.7 |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 93.5 | 62.5 | +31.0 | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 89.0 | 68.7 | +20.3 | |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 85.5 | 76.0 | +9.5 | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 83.0 | 73.5 | +9.5 | |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 83.0 | 75.0 | +8.0 | |
| 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 78.3 | 61.3 | +17.0 | |
| 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 77.3 | 63.3 | +14.0 | |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 66.0 | 64.3 | +1.7 | |
| 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50% | 81.2 | 75.5 | +5.8 | |
| 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 83.3 | 75.3 | +8.0 | |
| 11 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 70.0 | 66.7 | +3.3 | |
| 12 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 77.7 | 79.0 | -1.3 | |
| 13 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25% | 70.0 | 78.5 | -8.5 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.