PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (18) | 112.4 | 108.2 | 220.6 | +4.3 | 67% |
| Season at home (10) | 113.8 | 104.2 | 218.0 | +9.6 | 80% |
| Season away (8) | 110.8 | 113.1 | 223.9 | -2.4 | 50% |
| Last 10 (10) | 112.5 | 108.8 | 221.3 | +3.7 | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 113.4 | 108.2 | 221.6 | +5.2 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (7) | 104.9 | 110.1 | 215.0 | -5.3 | 43% |
| vs Similar (14) | 114.6 | 108.9 | 223.4 | +5.7 | 64% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (9) | 110.1 | 108.6 | 218.7 | +1.6 | 78% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (18) | 107.2 | 111.3 | 218.4 | -4.1 | 39% |
| Season at home (11) | 108.2 | 109.6 | 217.8 | -1.5 | 55% |
| Season away (7) | 105.6 | 113.9 | 219.4 | -8.3 | 14% |
| Last 10 (10) | 92.4 | 89.9 | 182.3 | +2.5 | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 95.4 | 100.8 | 196.2 | -5.4 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (8) | 81.9 | 89.9 | 171.8 | -8.0 | 38% |
| vs Similar (16) | 101.2 | 105.1 | 206.2 | -3.9 | 44% |
| vs Weaker (4) | 102.8 | 97.8 | 200.5 | +5.0 | 50% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 54.4 | 54.8 | 109.2 | -0.4 | 33% | - |
| Last 30 at home (17) | 54.2 | 54.8 | 108.9 | -0.6 | 35% | - |
| Last 30 away (13) | 54.7 | 54.8 | 109.5 | -0.2 | 31% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 55.0 | 53.6 | 108.6 | +1.4 | 40% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 55.8 | 49.6 | 105.4 | +6.2 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (7) | 52.3 | 54.9 | 107.1 | -2.6 | 14% | - |
| vs Similar (14) | 56.1 | 53.8 | 109.9 | +2.3 | 50% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (9) | 53.4 | 56.3 | 109.8 | -2.9 | 22% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 44.9 | 47.6 | 92.5 | -2.7 | 33% | - |
| Last 30 at home (17) | 48.3 | 46.4 | 94.7 | +1.9 | 47% | - |
| Last 30 away (13) | 40.5 | 49.2 | 89.6 | -8.7 | 15% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 44.0 | 44.5 | 88.5 | -0.5 | 40% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 43.0 | 52.6 | 95.6 | -9.6 | 20% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (8) | 36.1 | 44.9 | 81.0 | -8.8 | 12% | - |
| vs Similar (16) | 48.8 | 53.5 | 102.3 | -4.7 | 31% | - |
| vs Weaker (4) | 49.8 | 44.0 | 93.8 | +5.8 | 50% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 27/02/19 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 122-115 |
| 24/02/19 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 99-100 |
| 27/01/19 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 102-116 |
| 04/12/18 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 81-96 |
| 16/03/18 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 99-117 |
| 24/02/18 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 110-112 |
| 31/01/18 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 113-117 |
| 21/11/17 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 91-78 |
| 01/04/17 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 111-108 |
| 05/03/17 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 121-116 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/01/20 | A | Osceola Magic | 113-129 |
| 31/12/19 | A | Greensboro Swarm | 116-101 |
| 28/12/19 | H | Long Island Nets | 107-91 |
| 18/12/19 | H | Westchester | 104-90 |
| 15/12/19 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 127-130 OT |
| 14/12/19 | H | Grand Rapids Drive | 126-97 |
| 08/12/19 | A | Capital City Go-Go | 108-113 |
| 06/12/19 | H | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 116-109 |
| 30/11/19 | A | College Park Skyhawks | 110-100 |
| 30/11/19 | A | College Park Skyhawks | 98-128 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/01/20 | A | Capital City Go-Go | 128-126 |
| 01/01/20 | H | South Dakota Coyotes | 70-59 |
| 29/12/19 | H | Grand Rapids Drive | 95-106 |
| 22/12/19 | A | Iowa State | 59-89 |
| 17/12/19 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 125-124 |
| 15/12/19 | H | Erie BayHawks | 113-93 |
| 14/12/19 | A | IUPUI | 65-74 |
| 14/12/19 | H | Erie BayHawks | 109-93 |
| 11/12/19 | A | Osceola Magic | 91-102 |
| 11/12/19 | H | Judson | 69-33 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LWWWL | 67% |
| Home | WWLWW | 80% |
| Away | LWLWL | 50% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 18 | 10 | 8 |
| Win % | 67% | 80% | 50% |
| Points / game | 112.4 | 113.8 | 110.8 |
| Allowed / game | 108.2 | 104.2 | 113.1 |
| Point differential | +4.3 | +9.6 | -2.4 |
| Avg total | 220.6 | 218.0 | 223.9 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 44% | 50% | 38% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 50% (4) | 50% (2) | 50% (2) |
| Overtime % | 6% | 10% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WWWLW | 39% |
| Home | WWWWL | 55% |
| Away | LLLLW | 14% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 18 | 11 | 7 |
| Win % | 39% | 55% | 14% |
| Points / game | 107.2 | 108.2 | 105.6 |
| Allowed / game | 111.3 | 109.6 | 113.9 |
| Point differential | -4.1 | -1.5 | -8.3 |
| Avg total | 218.4 | 217.8 | 219.4 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 11% | 18% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 57% (7) | 60% (5) | 50% (2) |
| Overtime % | 6% | 0% | 14% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Memphis Hustle | 18 | 16 | 2 | 89% | 118.6 | 105.8 | +12.8 |
| 2 |  Wisconsin Herd | 18 | 15 | 3 | 83% | 121.2 | 113.4 | +7.8 |
| 3 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 16 | 12 | 4 | 75% | 109.6 | 101.5 | +8.1 |
| 4 |  Maine Red Claws | 17 | 12 | 5 | 71% | 120.0 | 114.1 | +5.9 |
| 5 | Canton Charge | 18 | 12 | 6 | 67% | 112.4 | 108.2 | +4.3 |
| 6 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 17 | 11 | 6 | 65% | 120.5 | 117.4 | +3.2 |
| 7 |  Stockton Kings | 18 | 11 | 7 | 61% | 117.4 | 114.0 | +3.4 |
| 8 |  South Bay Lakers | 18 | 10 | 8 | 56% | 121.8 | 120.9 | +0.9 |
| 9 |  Grand Rapids Drive | 18 | 10 | 8 | 56% | 106.3 | 105.5 | +0.8 |
| 10 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 18 | 10 | 8 | 56% | 112.8 | 113.1 | -0.3 |
| 11 |  Osceola Magic | 18 | 10 | 8 | 56% | 103.4 | 104.5 | -1.1 |
| 12 |  Texas Legends | 20 | 11 | 9 | 55% | 116.3 | 116.2 | +0.1 |
| 13 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 20 | 11 | 9 | 55% | 108.5 | 109.5 | -1.0 |
| 14 |  Capital City Go-Go | 17 | 9 | 8 | 53% | 113.0 | 113.0 | +0.0 |
| 15 |  College Park Skyhawks | 19 | 10 | 9 | 53% | 110.8 | 110.8 | +0.1 |
| 16 |  San Diego Clippers | 17 | 8 | 9 | 47% | 107.2 | 109.0 | -1.8 |
| 17 |  Windy City Bulls | 18 | 8 | 10 | 44% | 108.4 | 106.7 | +1.8 |
| 18 |  Iowa Wolves | 18 | 8 | 10 | 44% | 117.1 | 117.3 | -0.3 |
| 19 |  Raptors 905 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 44% | 109.5 | 110.8 | -1.2 |
| 20 |  Sioux Falls Skyforce | 20 | 8 | 12 | 40% | 104.8 | 107.2 | -2.5 |
| 21 |  Westchester | 18 | 7 | 11 | 39% | 106.2 | 107.3 | -1.1 |
| 22 | IPFW | 18 | 7 | 11 | 39% | 107.2 | 111.3 | -4.1 |
| 23 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 18 | 6 | 12 | 33% | 109.1 | 110.1 | -1.1 |
| 24 |  Erie BayHawks | 18 | 6 | 12 | 33% | 108.8 | 115.6 | -6.7 |
| 25 |  Long Island Nets | 17 | 5 | 12 | 29% | 108.1 | 111.9 | -3.8 |
| 26 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 21 | 5 | 16 | 24% | 115.2 | 120.2 | -5.0 |
| 27 |  Northern Arizona Suns | 18 | 4 | 14 | 22% | 105.8 | 115.5 | -9.7 |
| 28 |  Greensboro Swarm | 19 | 4 | 15 | 21% | 113.6 | 120.6 | -6.9 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | OT | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canton Charge | 34 | 23 | 26 | 23 | 6 | 112 |
| IPFW | 31 | 26 | 26 | 23 | 5 | 111 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
