PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (38) | 110.9 | 112.3 | 223.2 | -1.4 | 50% |
| Season at home (21) | 109.6 | 110.0 | 219.6 | -0.4 | 57% |
| Season away (17) | 112.5 | 115.2 | 227.7 | -2.8 | 41% |
| Last 10 (10) | 115.9 | 118.0 | 233.9 | -2.1 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 114.0 | 122.4 | 236.4 | -8.4 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (11) | 112.5 | 111.9 | 224.4 | +0.5 | 55% |
| vs Similar ◀ (18) | 107.6 | 111.7 | 219.2 | -4.1 | 44% |
| vs Weaker (1) | 125.0 | 120.0 | 245.0 | +5.0 | 100% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (37) | 104.6 | 108.2 | 212.8 | -3.6 | 38% |
| Season at home (18) | 105.3 | 109.9 | 215.3 | -4.6 | 33% |
| Season away (19) | 103.9 | 106.6 | 210.5 | -2.7 | 42% |
| Last 10 (10) | 98.5 | 110.0 | 208.5 | -11.5 | 20% |
| Last 5 (5) | 102.2 | 107.4 | 209.6 | -5.2 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (10) | 110.9 | 112.1 | 223.0 | -1.2 | 40% |
| vs Similar ◀ (18) | 102.6 | 106.7 | 209.3 | -4.2 | 39% |
| vs Weaker (2) | 105.5 | 117.0 | 222.5 | -11.5 | 0% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 55.5 | 55.7 | 111.2 | -0.3 | 50% | - |
| Last 30 at home (18) | 53.4 | 53.7 | 107.1 | -0.3 | 56% | - |
| Last 30 away (12) | 58.6 | 58.8 | 117.3 | -0.2 | 42% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 58.9 | 58.5 | 117.4 | +0.4 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 54.6 | 63.0 | 117.6 | -8.4 | 0% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (11) | 55.6 | 55.7 | 111.4 | -0.1 | 45% | - |
| vs Similar ◀ (18) | 54.8 | 55.4 | 110.2 | -0.7 | 50% | - |
| vs Weaker (1) | 66.0 | 61.0 | 127.0 | +5.0 | 100% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 52.9 | 54.9 | 107.8 | -2.0 | 43% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 52.9 | 55.3 | 108.2 | -2.4 | 38% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 52.9 | 54.4 | 107.4 | -1.5 | 50% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 50.1 | 54.5 | 104.6 | -4.4 | 30% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 54.0 | 52.2 | 106.2 | +1.8 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (10) | 57.4 | 57.8 | 115.2 | -0.4 | 50% | - |
| vs Similar ◀ (18) | 50.2 | 52.7 | 102.9 | -2.4 | 39% | - |
| vs Weaker (2) | 55.0 | 60.5 | 115.5 | -5.5 | 50% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 27/01/19 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 102-116 |
| 04/12/18 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 81-96 |
| 16/03/18 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 99-117 |
| 24/02/18 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 110-112 |
| 31/01/18 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 113-117 |
| 21/11/17 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 91-78 |
| 01/04/17 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 111-108 |
| 05/03/17 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 121-116 |
| 15/02/17 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 109-120 |
| 29/01/17 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 124-115 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23/02/19 | A | Windy City Bulls | 112-119 |
| 21/02/19 | A | Delaware Blue Coats | 129-140 |
| 14/02/19 | A | Osceola Magic | 127-123 |
| 10/02/19 | H | Santa Cruz Warriors | 104-114 |
| 09/02/19 | H | Windy City Bulls | 98-116 |
| 07/02/19 | H | Capital City Go-Go | 121-118 OT |
| 04/02/19 | A | Long Island Nets | 140-119 |
| 03/02/19 | A | Grand Rapids Drive | 95-117 |
| 02/02/19 | H | Raptors 905 | 117-112 |
| 27/01/19 | A | Canton Charge | 116-102 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23/02/19 | A | Erie BayHawks | 104-95 |
| 21/02/19 | H | Greensboro Swarm | 96-94 |
| 10/02/19 | A | Wisconsin Herd | 106-117 |
| 09/02/19 | A | Westchester | 96-112 |
| 07/02/19 | H | Grand Rapids Drive | 109-119 |
| 02/02/19 | H | Windy City Bulls | 77-120 |
| 30/01/19 | H | Maine Red Claws | 86-94 |
| 27/01/19 | H | IPFW | 102-116 |
| 26/01/19 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 105-117 |
| 24/01/19 | A | Osceola Magic | 104-116 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLWLL | 50% |
| Home | LWWLL | 57% |
| Away | LWWLL | 41% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 38 | 21 | 17 |
| Win % | 50% | 57% | 41% |
| Points / game | 110.9 | 109.6 | 112.5 |
| Allowed / game | 112.3 | 110.0 | 115.2 |
| Point differential | -1.4 | -0.4 | -2.8 |
| Avg total | 223.2 | 219.6 | 227.7 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 21% | 24% | 18% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 80% (10) | 100% (6) | 50% (4) |
| Overtime % | 5% | 10% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLLWW | 38% |
| Home | LLLLW | 33% |
| Away | WLLLW | 42% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 37 | 18 | 19 |
| Win % | 38% | 33% | 42% |
| Points / game | 104.6 | 105.3 | 103.9 |
| Allowed / game | 108.2 | 109.9 | 106.6 |
| Point differential | -3.6 | -4.6 | -2.7 |
| Avg total | 212.8 | 215.3 | 210.5 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 19% | 11% | 26% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 43% (7) | 40% (5) | 50% (2) |
| Overtime % | 5% | 6% | 5% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 38 | 27 | 11 | 71% | 104.5 | 99.8 | +4.7 |
| 2 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 41 | 28 | 13 | 68% | 113.4 | 108.7 | +4.7 |
| 3 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 39 | 25 | 14 | 64% | 112.6 | 108.6 | +4.1 |
| 4 |  Osceola Magic | 39 | 25 | 14 | 64% | 110.6 | 106.6 | +3.9 |
| 5 |  Long Island Nets | 38 | 23 | 15 | 61% | 116.1 | 112.7 | +3.4 |
| 6 |  Stockton Kings | 38 | 23 | 15 | 61% | 110.4 | 108.4 | +1.9 |
| 7 |  Sioux Falls Skyforce | 39 | 23 | 16 | 59% | 117.7 | 114.1 | +3.6 |
| 8 |  Raptors 905 | 39 | 23 | 16 | 59% | 111.7 | 108.4 | +3.3 |
| 9 |  Westchester | 41 | 24 | 17 | 59% | 107.2 | 104.1 | +3.1 |
| 10 |  Memphis Hustle | 38 | 21 | 17 | 55% | 113.6 | 109.3 | +4.3 |
| 11 |  Capital City Go-Go | 38 | 21 | 17 | 55% | 111.9 | 112.2 | -0.3 |
| 12 |  Windy City Bulls | 39 | 21 | 18 | 54% | 104.5 | 103.8 | +0.6 |
| 13 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 39 | 20 | 19 | 51% | 108.4 | 106.6 | +1.8 |
| 14 | IPFW | 38 | 19 | 19 | 50% | 110.9 | 112.3 | -1.4 |
| 15 |  Grand Rapids Drive | 39 | 19 | 20 | 49% | 107.7 | 107.7 | -0.0 |
| 16 |  Greensboro Swarm | 39 | 19 | 20 | 49% | 108.4 | 109.7 | -1.3 |
| 17 |  San Diego Clippers | 37 | 18 | 19 | 49% | 111.5 | 111.9 | -0.4 |
| 18 |  Erie BayHawks | 38 | 18 | 20 | 47% | 117.6 | 116.2 | +1.3 |
| 19 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 37 | 16 | 21 | 43% | 112.2 | 112.5 | -0.3 |
| 20 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 37 | 16 | 21 | 43% | 104.8 | 109.8 | -5.0 |
| 21 |  Maine Red Claws | 38 | 15 | 23 | 39% | 105.6 | 108.3 | -2.7 |
| 22 |  Iowa Wolves | 41 | 16 | 25 | 39% | 112.2 | 114.7 | -2.5 |
| 23 |  South Bay Lakers | 39 | 15 | 24 | 38% | 109.8 | 114.0 | -4.2 |
| 24 | Canton Charge | 37 | 14 | 23 | 38% | 104.6 | 108.2 | -3.6 |
| 25 |  Texas Legends | 39 | 14 | 25 | 36% | 110.6 | 114.7 | -4.1 |
| 26 |  Wisconsin Herd | 37 | 9 | 28 | 24% | 109.4 | 117.3 | -7.9 |
| 27 |  Northern Arizona Suns | 40 | 9 | 31 | 22% | 100.6 | 108.5 | -7.8 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPFW | 31 | 34 | 22 | 12 | 99 |
| Canton Charge | 24 | 19 | 32 | 25 | 100 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
