PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (38) | 115.3 | 111.1 | 226.4 | +4.2 | 68% |
| Season at home (21) | 116.2 | 107.5 | 223.8 | +8.7 | 86% |
| Season away (17) | 114.2 | 115.6 | 229.8 | -1.4 | 47% |
| Last 10 (10) | 117.0 | 112.5 | 229.5 | +4.5 | 70% |
| Last 5 (5) | 124.6 | 112.4 | 237.0 | +12.2 | 100% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar ◀ (17) | 117.6 | 114.5 | 232.2 | +3.1 | 53% |
| vs Weaker (13) | 114.1 | 109.0 | 223.1 | +5.1 | 85% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (38) | 121.1 | 114.8 | 235.9 | +6.3 | 79% |
| Season at home (20) | 123.3 | 118.5 | 241.9 | +4.8 | 70% |
| Season away (18) | 118.6 | 110.7 | 229.2 | +7.9 | 89% |
| Last 10 (10) | 121.2 | 115.5 | 236.7 | +5.7 | 80% |
| Last 5 (5) | 119.4 | 114.2 | 233.6 | +5.2 | 80% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar ◀ (8) | 121.9 | 119.1 | 241.0 | +2.8 | 75% |
| vs Weaker (22) | 122.0 | 115.1 | 237.1 | +6.8 | 77% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 57.1 | 54.4 | 111.5 | +2.7 | 47% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 56.8 | 53.9 | 110.6 | +2.9 | 50% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 57.5 | 55.0 | 112.5 | +2.5 | 43% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 57.7 | 51.9 | 109.6 | +5.8 | 70% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 62.8 | 53.4 | 116.2 | +9.4 | 100% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar ◀ (17) | 57.9 | 55.4 | 113.3 | +2.5 | 47% | - |
| vs Weaker (13) | 56.1 | 53.1 | 109.2 | +3.0 | 46% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 60.3 | 57.5 | 117.8 | +2.9 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 at home (17) | 61.7 | 58.4 | 120.1 | +3.3 | 65% | - |
| Last 30 away (13) | 58.5 | 56.2 | 114.8 | +2.3 | 54% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 61.0 | 56.2 | 117.2 | +4.8 | 70% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 58.4 | 54.2 | 112.6 | +4.2 | 80% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar ◀ (8) | 58.5 | 57.9 | 116.4 | +0.6 | 50% | - |
| vs Weaker (22) | 61.0 | 57.3 | 118.3 | +3.7 | 64% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 12/01/20 | Wisconsin Herd v Canton Charge | 131-123 |
| 10/01/20 | Wisconsin Herd v Canton Charge | 111-123 |
| 15/12/19 | Canton Charge v Wisconsin Herd | 127-130 OT |
| 09/03/19 | Canton Charge v Wisconsin Herd | 119-116 |
| 10/02/19 | Wisconsin Herd v Canton Charge | 117-106 |
| 26/01/19 | Canton Charge v Wisconsin Herd | 105-117 |
| 04/11/18 | Wisconsin Herd v Canton Charge | 101-89 |
| 24/03/18 | Wisconsin Herd v Canton Charge | 117-139 |
| 17/03/18 | Canton Charge v Wisconsin Herd | 109-103 |
| 04/01/18 | Wisconsin Herd v Canton Charge | 128-126 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/20 | H | IPFW | 111-106 |
| 29/02/20 | H | Capital City Go-Go | 136-112 |
| 26/02/20 | H | College Park Skyhawks | 121-116 |
| 23/02/20 | A | IPFW | 124-113 |
| 22/02/20 | A | Delaware Blue Coats | 131-115 |
| 20/02/20 | H | Northern Arizona Suns | 106-94 |
| 14/02/20 | A | Grand Rapids Drive | 101-103 |
| 08/02/20 | A | Westchester | 124-120 OT |
| 07/02/20 | A | Maine Red Claws | 98-122 |
| 02/02/20 | A | IPFW | 118-124 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29/02/20 | A | Westchester | 115-108 |
| 28/02/20 | H | Delaware Blue Coats | 125-106 |
| 26/02/20 | H | Delaware Blue Coats | 133-128 |
| 23/02/20 | H | Grand Rapids Drive | 117-126 |
| 20/02/20 | A | Grand Rapids Drive | 107-103 |
| 14/02/20 | H | Greensboro Swarm | 126-115 |
| 11/02/20 | A | College Park Skyhawks | 118-115 |
| 09/02/20 | H | Maine Red Claws | 134-118 |
| 08/02/20 | H | IPFW | 127-119 |
| 05/02/20 | H | Long Island Nets | 110-117 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WWWWW | 68% |
| Home | WWWWW | 86% |
| Away | LWLWW | 47% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 38 | 21 | 17 |
| Win % | 68% | 86% | 47% |
| Points / game | 115.3 | 116.2 | 114.2 |
| Allowed / game | 111.1 | 107.5 | 115.6 |
| Point differential | +4.2 | +8.7 | -1.4 |
| Avg total | 226.4 | 223.8 | 229.8 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 42% | 48% | 35% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 73% (11) | 86% (7) | 50% (4) |
| Overtime % | 11% | 14% | 6% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLWWW | 79% |
| Home | WWLWW | 70% |
| Away | WLWWW | 89% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 38 | 20 | 18 |
| Win % | 79% | 70% | 89% |
| Points / game | 121.1 | 123.3 | 118.6 |
| Allowed / game | 114.8 | 118.5 | 110.7 |
| Point differential | +6.3 | +4.8 | +7.9 |
| Avg total | 235.9 | 241.9 | 229.2 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 34% | 40% | 28% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 86% (7) | 100% (1) | 83% (6) |
| Overtime % | 3% | 0% | 6% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wisconsin Herd | 38 | 30 | 8 | 79% | 121.1 | 114.8 | +6.3 |
| 2 |  Maine Red Claws | 37 | 27 | 10 | 73% | 117.4 | 111.2 | +6.2 |
| 3 |  Memphis Hustle | 37 | 26 | 11 | 70% | 119.2 | 113.0 | +6.2 |
| 4 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 38 | 26 | 12 | 68% | 111.7 | 106.9 | +4.8 |
| 5 | Canton Charge | 38 | 26 | 12 | 68% | 115.3 | 111.1 | +4.2 |
| 6 |  Grand Rapids Drive | 38 | 23 | 15 | 61% | 109.1 | 104.2 | +4.9 |
| 7 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 37 | 21 | 16 | 57% | 116.3 | 115.0 | +1.3 |
| 8 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 37 | 21 | 16 | 57% | 114.0 | 113.1 | +0.9 |
| 9 |  Osceola Magic | 37 | 21 | 16 | 57% | 107.9 | 108.4 | -0.5 |
| 10 |  Texas Legends | 39 | 22 | 17 | 56% | 117.9 | 116.6 | +1.3 |
| 11 |  Capital City Go-Go | 39 | 21 | 18 | 54% | 113.8 | 113.8 | -0.0 |
| 12 |  Stockton Kings | 38 | 20 | 18 | 53% | 119.0 | 118.9 | +0.1 |
| 13 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 36 | 18 | 18 | 50% | 116.7 | 113.7 | +3.0 |
| 14 |  Sioux Falls Skyforce | 38 | 19 | 19 | 50% | 108.8 | 108.2 | +0.6 |
| 15 |  College Park Skyhawks | 38 | 19 | 19 | 50% | 112.1 | 112.3 | -0.2 |
| 16 |  San Diego Clippers | 39 | 19 | 20 | 49% | 110.3 | 111.0 | -0.7 |
| 17 |  Raptors 905 | 37 | 18 | 19 | 49% | 112.1 | 112.1 | -0.1 |
| 18 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 37 | 18 | 19 | 49% | 110.9 | 112.6 | -1.8 |
| 19 |  Long Island Nets | 37 | 17 | 20 | 46% | 112.2 | 111.6 | +0.6 |
| 20 |  South Bay Lakers | 38 | 17 | 21 | 45% | 123.9 | 126.7 | -2.8 |
| 21 |  IPFW | 38 | 16 | 22 | 42% | 112.3 | 113.2 | -0.9 |
| 22 |  Iowa Wolves | 37 | 15 | 22 | 41% | 120.1 | 121.0 | -1.0 |
| 23 |  Westchester | 38 | 15 | 23 | 39% | 110.3 | 111.2 | -0.9 |
| 24 |  Windy City Bulls | 37 | 14 | 23 | 38% | 105.1 | 108.5 | -3.4 |
| 25 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 37 | 12 | 25 | 32% | 116.9 | 120.2 | -3.3 |
| 26 |  Erie BayHawks | 38 | 10 | 28 | 26% | 110.7 | 118.7 | -8.0 |
| 27 |  Northern Arizona Suns | 37 | 8 | 29 | 22% | 107.8 | 115.9 | -8.1 |
| 28 |  Greensboro Swarm | 39 | 8 | 31 | 21% | 111.2 | 119.5 | -8.3 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | OT | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canton Charge | 41 | 17 | 25 | 19 | 6 | 108 |
| Wisconsin Herd | 22 | 25 | 24 | 31 | 4 | 106 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
