PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (35) | 112.9 | 113.0 | 225.9 | -0.1 | 46% |
| Season at home (19) | 113.8 | 111.1 | 224.9 | +2.7 | 63% |
| Season away (16) | 111.9 | 115.2 | 227.1 | -3.3 | 25% |
| Last 10 (10) | 99.1 | 99.1 | 198.2 | +0.0 | 30% |
| Last 5 (5) | 84.4 | 89.2 | 173.6 | -4.8 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (12) | 89.8 | 98.6 | 188.3 | -8.8 | 8% |
| vs Similar (13) | 105.5 | 99.4 | 204.8 | +6.1 | 62% |
| vs Weaker (5) | 90.2 | 87.0 | 177.2 | +3.2 | 80% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (34) | 114.4 | 111.1 | 225.5 | +3.4 | 65% |
| Season at home (18) | 115.2 | 106.9 | 222.1 | +8.3 | 83% |
| Season away (16) | 113.6 | 115.8 | 229.3 | -2.2 | 44% |
| Last 10 (10) | 117.5 | 112.9 | 230.4 | +4.6 | 70% |
| Last 5 (5) | 112.0 | 110.8 | 222.8 | +1.2 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar (18) | 116.3 | 115.1 | 231.3 | +1.2 | 50% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (12) | 113.2 | 108.7 | 221.8 | +4.5 | 83% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 46.7 | 47.7 | 94.4 | -1.0 | 43% | - |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 45.0 | 47.9 | 92.9 | -2.9 | 43% | - |
| Last 30 away (16) | 48.2 | 47.6 | 95.8 | +0.7 | 44% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 50.9 | 47.2 | 98.1 | +3.7 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 45.0 | 42.8 | 87.8 | +2.2 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (12) | 40.9 | 48.9 | 89.8 | -8.0 | 8% | - |
| vs Similar (13) | 52.2 | 50.0 | 102.2 | +2.2 | 54% | - |
| vs Weaker (5) | 46.6 | 38.8 | 85.4 | +7.8 | 100% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 55.6 | 54.9 | 110.5 | +0.8 | 37% | - |
| Last 30 at home (15) | 55.2 | 55.0 | 110.2 | +0.2 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 away (15) | 56.1 | 54.7 | 110.8 | +1.3 | 33% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 55.2 | 53.2 | 108.4 | +2.0 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 51.6 | 53.6 | 105.2 | -2.0 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar (18) | 56.1 | 55.8 | 111.9 | +0.3 | 39% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (12) | 54.9 | 53.5 | 108.4 | +1.4 | 33% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 02/02/20 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 124-118 |
| 05/01/20 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 112-111 OT |
| 27/02/19 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 122-115 |
| 24/02/19 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 99-100 |
| 27/01/19 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 102-116 |
| 04/12/18 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 81-96 |
| 16/03/18 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 99-117 |
| 24/02/18 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 110-112 |
| 31/01/18 | Canton Charge v IPFW | 113-117 |
| 21/11/17 | IPFW v Canton Charge | 91-78 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22/02/20 | A | Westchester | 112-106 |
| 21/02/20 | H | Nebraska O. | 59-61 |
| 20/02/20 | A | Greensboro Swarm | 117-124 |
| 16/02/20 | A | South Dakota St. | 64-75 |
| 15/02/20 | A | North Dakota St | 70-80 |
| 14/02/20 | A | Capital City Go-Go | 125-130 |
| 12/02/20 | H | Maine Red Claws | 119-123 OT |
| 09/02/20 | H | Delaware Blue Coats | 136-102 |
| 08/02/20 | A | Denver | 70-63 |
| 08/02/20 | A | Wisconsin Herd | 119-127 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22/02/20 | A | Delaware Blue Coats | 131-115 |
| 20/02/20 | H | Northern Arizona Suns | 106-94 |
| 14/02/20 | A | Grand Rapids Drive | 101-103 |
| 08/02/20 | A | Westchester | 124-120 OT |
| 07/02/20 | A | Maine Red Claws | 98-122 |
| 02/02/20 | A | IPFW | 118-124 |
| 01/02/20 | H | Windy City Bulls | 123-105 |
| 30/01/20 | H | Delaware Blue Coats | 116-103 |
| 26/01/20 | H | Capital City Go-Go | 120-118 OT |
| 23/01/20 | H | Osceola Magic | 138-125 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLLLW | 46% |
| Home | WWWWL | 63% |
| Away | LLLLW | 25% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 35 | 19 | 16 |
| Win % | 46% | 63% | 25% |
| Points / game | 112.9 | 113.8 | 111.9 |
| Allowed / game | 113.0 | 111.1 | 115.2 |
| Point differential | -0.1 | +2.7 | -3.3 |
| Avg total | 225.9 | 224.9 | 227.1 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 14% | 21% | 6% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 42% (12) | 57% (7) | 20% (5) |
| Overtime % | 9% | 5% | 12% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LWLWW | 65% |
| Home | WWWWW | 83% |
| Away | LLWLW | 44% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 34 | 18 | 16 |
| Win % | 65% | 83% | 44% |
| Points / game | 114.4 | 115.2 | 113.6 |
| Allowed / game | 111.1 | 106.9 | 115.8 |
| Point differential | +3.4 | +8.3 | -2.2 |
| Avg total | 225.5 | 222.1 | 229.3 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 41% | 50% | 31% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 67% (9) | 80% (5) | 50% (4) |
| Overtime % | 12% | 17% | 6% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Wisconsin Herd | 34 | 27 | 7 | 79% | 120.9 | 114.6 | +6.4 |
| 2 |  Memphis Hustle | 35 | 26 | 9 | 74% | 120.3 | 113.1 | +7.2 |
| 3 |  Maine Red Claws | 33 | 24 | 9 | 73% | 117.6 | 112.0 | +5.5 |
| 4 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 33 | 22 | 11 | 67% | 110.6 | 105.9 | +4.7 |
| 5 | Canton Charge | 34 | 22 | 12 | 65% | 114.4 | 111.1 | +3.4 |
| 6 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 33 | 20 | 13 | 61% | 114.3 | 113.1 | +1.2 |
| 7 |  Grand Rapids Drive | 35 | 21 | 14 | 60% | 108.5 | 104.0 | +4.5 |
| 8 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 33 | 19 | 14 | 58% | 116.5 | 115.1 | +1.4 |
| 9 |  Capital City Go-Go | 35 | 20 | 15 | 57% | 114.2 | 113.4 | +0.8 |
| 10 |  Osceola Magic | 33 | 18 | 15 | 55% | 107.3 | 108.2 | -0.9 |
| 11 |  Stockton Kings | 34 | 18 | 16 | 53% | 119.4 | 118.8 | +0.6 |
| 12 |  College Park Skyhawks | 35 | 18 | 17 | 51% | 111.9 | 111.7 | +0.1 |
| 13 |  Texas Legends | 35 | 18 | 17 | 51% | 116.6 | 116.7 | -0.1 |
| 14 |  Sioux Falls Skyforce | 36 | 18 | 18 | 50% | 108.8 | 108.0 | +0.8 |
| 15 |  San Diego Clippers | 36 | 18 | 18 | 50% | 109.9 | 110.8 | -0.9 |
| 16 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 34 | 17 | 17 | 50% | 110.0 | 111.4 | -1.4 |
| 17 |  Raptors 905 | 35 | 17 | 18 | 49% | 112.1 | 112.4 | -0.4 |
| 18 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 34 | 16 | 18 | 47% | 116.2 | 113.9 | +2.3 |
| 19 | IPFW | 35 | 16 | 19 | 46% | 112.9 | 113.0 | -0.1 |
| 20 |  Iowa Wolves | 35 | 15 | 20 | 43% | 119.6 | 120.1 | -0.5 |
| 21 |  Long Island Nets | 33 | 14 | 19 | 42% | 111.2 | 111.9 | -0.8 |
| 22 |  South Bay Lakers | 34 | 14 | 20 | 41% | 122.8 | 126.2 | -3.4 |
| 23 |  Westchester | 35 | 14 | 21 | 40% | 109.8 | 110.9 | -1.1 |
| 24 |  Windy City Bulls | 33 | 12 | 21 | 36% | 105.4 | 107.8 | -2.4 |
| 25 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 34 | 11 | 23 | 32% | 116.1 | 119.8 | -3.7 |
| 26 |  Erie BayHawks | 34 | 9 | 25 | 26% | 110.3 | 118.8 | -8.5 |
| 27 |  Greensboro Swarm | 35 | 8 | 27 | 23% | 112.2 | 119.3 | -7.1 |
| 28 |  Northern Arizona Suns | 35 | 8 | 27 | 23% | 107.6 | 115.1 | -7.5 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPFW | 29 | 27 | 21 | 36 | 113 |
| Canton Charge | 35 | 25 | 24 | 40 | 124 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
