PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (40) | 108.8 | 104.2 | 212.9 | +4.6 | 60% |
| Season at home (18) | 113.3 | 105.2 | 218.5 | +8.1 | 67% |
| Season away (22) | 105.0 | 103.3 | 208.3 | +1.8 | 55% |
| Last 10 (10) | 110.9 | 103.6 | 214.5 | +7.3 | 70% |
| Last 5 (5) | 110.8 | 105.4 | 216.2 | +5.4 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar (17) | 107.6 | 107.5 | 215.2 | +0.1 | 47% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (13) | 110.1 | 98.9 | 209.0 | +11.2 | 69% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (40) | 112.2 | 112.9 | 225.1 | -0.7 | 45% |
| Season at home (22) | 113.5 | 111.4 | 224.8 | +2.1 | 64% |
| Season away (18) | 110.7 | 114.8 | 225.5 | -4.2 | 22% |
| Last 10 (10) | 90.5 | 93.9 | 184.4 | -3.4 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 92.0 | 94.6 | 186.6 | -2.6 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (14) | 89.8 | 97.4 | 187.2 | -7.6 | 21% |
| vs Similar (12) | 103.8 | 99.2 | 202.9 | +4.6 | 58% |
| vs Weaker (4) | 80.0 | 76.8 | 156.8 | +3.2 | 75% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 51.7 | 51.1 | 102.8 | +0.7 | 47% | - |
| Last 30 at home (13) | 54.8 | 53.5 | 108.3 | +1.2 | 54% | - |
| Last 30 away (17) | 49.4 | 49.2 | 98.6 | +0.2 | 41% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 50.8 | 52.4 | 103.2 | -1.6 | 40% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 46.6 | 53.2 | 99.8 | -6.6 | 20% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar (17) | 50.9 | 52.1 | 102.9 | -1.2 | 35% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (13) | 52.8 | 49.8 | 102.6 | +3.1 | 62% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 46.2 | 45.8 | 92.1 | +0.4 | 47% | - |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 46.4 | 46.3 | 92.7 | +0.1 | 50% | - |
| Last 30 away (16) | 46.1 | 45.4 | 91.5 | +0.6 | 44% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 45.3 | 43.0 | 88.3 | +2.3 | 60% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 44.4 | 43.6 | 88.0 | +0.8 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (14) | 42.3 | 47.7 | 90.0 | -5.4 | 21% | - |
| vs Similar (12) | 52.3 | 49.4 | 101.8 | +2.9 | 58% | - |
| vs Weaker (4) | 41.8 | 28.5 | 70.2 | +13.2 | 100% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 08/03/20 | IPFW v Grand Rapids Drive | 105-103 |
| 29/12/19 | IPFW v Grand Rapids Drive | 95-106 |
| 23/11/19 | Grand Rapids Drive v IPFW | 111-96 |
| 23/03/19 | IPFW v Grand Rapids Drive | 118-121 |
| 03/02/19 | Grand Rapids Drive v IPFW | 117-95 |
| 19/01/19 | Grand Rapids Drive v IPFW | 123-105 |
| 11/12/18 | IPFW v Grand Rapids Drive | 108-101 OT |
| 13/03/18 | Grand Rapids Drive v IPFW | 116-112 OT |
| 28/02/18 | Grand Rapids Drive v IPFW | 104-115 |
| 31/12/17 | IPFW v Grand Rapids Drive | 118-117 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/03/20 | A | IPFW | 103-105 |
| 07/03/20 | A | Maine Red Claws | 102-101 |
| 01/03/20 | H | Osceola Magic | 107-121 |
| 25/02/20 | H | Windy City Bulls | 116-83 |
| 23/02/20 | A | Wisconsin Herd | 126-117 |
| 22/02/20 | H | Northern Arizona Suns | 127-104 |
| 20/02/20 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 103-107 |
| 14/02/20 | H | Canton Charge | 103-101 |
| 12/02/20 | H | Westchester | 117-105 |
| 09/02/20 | A | Windy City Bulls | 105-92 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/20 | A | North Dakota | 56-73 |
| 08/03/20 | H | Grand Rapids Drive | 105-103 |
| 08/03/20 | A | South Dakota St. | 77-74 |
| 07/03/20 | H | College Park Skyhawks | 116-112 |
| 01/03/20 | A | Canton Charge | 106-111 |
| 01/03/20 | A | Oral Roberts | 66-72 |
| 27/02/20 | H | Denver | 58-51 |
| 26/02/20 | A | Raptors 905 | 96-113 |
| 23/02/20 | H | Canton Charge | 113-124 |
| 22/02/20 | A | Westchester | 112-106 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WWLWL | 60% |
| Home | WLWWL | 67% |
| Away | WWWWL | 55% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 40 | 18 | 22 |
| Win % | 60% | 67% | 55% |
| Points / game | 108.8 | 113.3 | 105.0 |
| Allowed / game | 104.2 | 105.2 | 103.3 |
| Point differential | +4.6 | +8.1 | +1.8 |
| Avg total | 212.9 | 218.5 | 208.3 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 38% | 50% | 27% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 50% (12) | 33% (6) | 67% (6) |
| Overtime % | 2% | 6% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLLWW | 45% |
| Home | WLLWW | 64% |
| Away | LLWLL | 22% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 40 | 22 | 18 |
| Win % | 45% | 64% | 22% |
| Points / game | 112.2 | 113.5 | 110.7 |
| Allowed / game | 112.9 | 111.4 | 114.8 |
| Point differential | -0.7 | +2.1 | -4.2 |
| Avg total | 225.1 | 224.8 | 225.5 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 12% | 18% | 6% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 47% (15) | 67% (9) | 17% (6) |
| Overtime % | 8% | 5% | 11% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Wisconsin Herd | 41 | 32 | 9 | 78% | 120.9 | 114.7 | +6.2 |
| 2 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 40 | 28 | 12 | 70% | 111.2 | 106.4 | +4.8 |
| 3 |  Canton Charge | 41 | 28 | 13 | 68% | 114.9 | 111.0 | +3.8 |
| 4 |  Maine Red Claws | 40 | 27 | 13 | 68% | 116.2 | 111.2 | +5.0 |
| 5 |  Memphis Hustle | 39 | 26 | 13 | 67% | 118.9 | 113.4 | +5.5 |
| 6 | Grand Rapids Drive | 40 | 24 | 16 | 60% | 108.8 | 104.2 | +4.6 |
| 7 |  Osceola Magic | 40 | 24 | 16 | 60% | 109.6 | 109.3 | +0.3 |
| 8 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 39 | 23 | 16 | 59% | 114.2 | 113.2 | +1.0 |
| 9 |  Texas Legends | 41 | 23 | 18 | 56% | 117.3 | 116.2 | +1.2 |
| 10 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 41 | 22 | 19 | 54% | 115.6 | 115.1 | +0.5 |
| 11 |  Capital City Go-Go | 41 | 22 | 19 | 54% | 114.0 | 114.2 | -0.1 |
| 12 |  Sioux Falls Skyforce | 40 | 21 | 19 | 52% | 109.5 | 108.2 | +1.4 |
| 13 |  Raptors 905 | 40 | 21 | 19 | 52% | 112.5 | 111.6 | +0.9 |
| 14 |  Stockton Kings | 40 | 21 | 19 | 52% | 119.6 | 119.5 | +0.1 |
| 15 |  San Diego Clippers | 42 | 21 | 21 | 50% | 110.4 | 111.0 | -0.5 |
| 16 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 39 | 19 | 20 | 49% | 116.9 | 114.3 | +2.6 |
| 17 |  College Park Skyhawks | 40 | 19 | 21 | 48% | 112.3 | 112.7 | -0.4 |
| 18 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 40 | 19 | 21 | 48% | 110.3 | 112.7 | -2.3 |
| 19 |  Long Island Nets | 40 | 18 | 22 | 45% | 112.5 | 112.2 | +0.3 |
| 20 | IPFW | 40 | 18 | 22 | 45% | 112.2 | 112.9 | -0.7 |
| 21 |  South Bay Lakers | 41 | 18 | 23 | 44% | 124.2 | 126.8 | -2.6 |
| 22 |  Iowa Wolves | 40 | 16 | 24 | 40% | 119.8 | 120.7 | -0.9 |
| 23 |  Westchester | 39 | 15 | 24 | 38% | 110.3 | 111.3 | -1.1 |
| 24 |  Windy City Bulls | 41 | 15 | 26 | 37% | 105.2 | 108.8 | -3.6 |
| 25 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 39 | 14 | 25 | 36% | 117.4 | 119.8 | -2.4 |
| 26 |  Erie BayHawks | 41 | 12 | 29 | 29% | 111.8 | 119.1 | -7.4 |
| 27 |  Greensboro Swarm | 41 | 9 | 32 | 22% | 111.8 | 119.3 | -7.6 |
| 28 |  Northern Arizona Suns | 40 | 8 | 32 | 20% | 108.4 | 116.6 | -8.2 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Rapids Drive | 20 | 25 | 29 | 29 | 103 |
| IPFW | 38 | 22 | 33 | 18 | 111 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
