PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (20) | 109.2 | 113.2 | 222.4 | -4.1 | 30% |
| Season at home (9) | 112.1 | 118.9 | 231.0 | -6.8 | 22% |
| Season away (11) | 106.7 | 108.6 | 215.4 | -1.9 | 36% |
| Last 10 (10) | 105.8 | 108.1 | 213.9 | -2.3 | 40% |
| Last 5 (5) | 104.8 | 116.2 | 221.0 | -11.4 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (3) | 119.3 | 127.0 | 246.3 | -7.7 | 0% |
| vs Similar ◀ (22) | 109.0 | 111.8 | 220.7 | -2.8 | 41% |
| vs Weaker (5) | 122.0 | 117.4 | 239.4 | +4.6 | 80% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (22) | 108.2 | 111.9 | 220.0 | -3.7 | 36% |
| Season at home (13) | 109.1 | 110.2 | 219.2 | -1.1 | 54% |
| Season away (9) | 106.9 | 114.3 | 221.2 | -7.4 | 11% |
| Last 10 (10) | 95.1 | 97.1 | 192.2 | -2.0 | 40% |
| Last 5 (5) | 95.6 | 97.0 | 192.6 | -1.4 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (10) | 84.2 | 91.9 | 176.1 | -7.7 | 30% |
| vs Similar ◀ (13) | 96.6 | 98.5 | 195.2 | -1.9 | 54% |
| vs Weaker (5) | 97.6 | 92.0 | 189.6 | +5.6 | 60% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 56.5 | 57.3 | 113.8 | -0.8 | 50% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 57.6 | 56.2 | 113.8 | +1.3 | 62% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 55.2 | 58.5 | 113.7 | -3.3 | 36% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 51.3 | 55.8 | 107.1 | -4.5 | 40% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 48.4 | 64.2 | 112.6 | -15.8 | 0% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (3) | 54.7 | 66.7 | 121.3 | -12.0 | 0% | - |
| vs Similar ◀ (22) | 56.0 | 56.1 | 112.2 | -0.1 | 55% | - |
| vs Weaker (5) | 59.4 | 56.8 | 116.2 | +2.6 | 60% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 42.2 | 44.6 | 86.8 | -2.3 | 37% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 45.1 | 42.6 | 87.7 | +2.4 | 56% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 39.0 | 46.8 | 85.8 | -7.8 | 14% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 41.7 | 47.5 | 89.2 | -5.8 | 20% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 41.4 | 46.0 | 87.4 | -4.6 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (10) | 38.0 | 46.1 | 84.1 | -8.1 | 10% | - |
| vs Similar ◀ (13) | 43.8 | 47.9 | 91.7 | -4.2 | 38% | - |
| vs Weaker (5) | 48.0 | 43.2 | 91.2 | +4.8 | 60% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 10/11/19 | IPFW v Long Island Nets | 117-121 |
| 07/03/19 | Long Island Nets v IPFW | 128-123 |
| 04/02/19 | Long Island Nets v IPFW | 119-140 |
| 08/12/18 | IPFW v Long Island Nets | 111-117 |
| 04/02/18 | IPFW v Long Island Nets | 108-91 |
| 22/12/17 | IPFW v Long Island Nets | 117-120 |
| 04/11/17 | Long Island Nets v IPFW | 115-99 |
| 28/03/17 | Long Island Nets v IPFW | 100-116 |
| 10/01/17 | Long Island Nets v IPFW | 112-120 |
| 17/12/16 | IPFW v Long Island Nets | 113-118 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/01/20 | A | Greensboro Swarm | 119-109 |
| 09/01/20 | A | Grand Rapids Drive | 98-114 |
| 05/01/20 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 128-140 |
| 04/01/20 | A | Delaware Blue Coats | 88-111 |
| 28/12/19 | A | Canton Charge | 91-107 |
| 28/12/19 | H | Erie BayHawks | 109-95 |
| 15/12/19 | A | Osceola Magic | 102-74 |
| 11/12/19 | H | Westchester | 119-106 |
| 10/12/19 | H | Raptors 905 | 95-106 |
| 07/12/19 | H | Santa Cruz Warriors | 109-119 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14/01/20 | H | Capital City Go-Go | 113-105 |
| 12/01/20 | A | Windy City Bulls | 112-120 |
| 12/01/20 | H | South Dakota St. | 61-70 |
| 09/01/20 | A | Western Illinois | 77-69 |
| 08/01/20 | H | Wisconsin Herd | 115-121 |
| 05/01/20 | A | North Dakota | 69-83 |
| 05/01/20 | A | Canton Charge | 111-112 OT |
| 04/01/20 | A | Capital City Go-Go | 128-126 |
| 01/01/20 | H | South Dakota Coyotes | 70-59 |
| 29/12/19 | H | Grand Rapids Drive | 95-106 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLLLW | 30% |
| Home | LLWWL | 22% |
| Away | WLLLW | 36% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 20 | 9 | 11 |
| Win % | 30% | 22% | 36% |
| Points / game | 109.2 | 112.1 | 106.7 |
| Allowed / game | 113.2 | 118.9 | 108.6 |
| Point differential | -4.1 | -6.8 | -1.9 |
| Avg total | 222.4 | 231.0 | 215.4 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 20% | 22% | 18% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 33% (6) | - | 33% (6) |
| Overtime % | 5% | 0% | 9% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLLLW | 36% |
| Home | WWLLW | 54% |
| Away | LLWLL | 11% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 22 | 13 | 9 |
| Win % | 36% | 54% | 11% |
| Points / game | 108.2 | 109.1 | 106.9 |
| Allowed / game | 111.9 | 110.2 | 114.3 |
| Point differential | -3.7 | -1.1 | -7.4 |
| Avg total | 220.0 | 219.2 | 221.2 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 9% | 15% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 50% (8) | 60% (5) | 33% (3) |
| Overtime % | 9% | 0% | 22% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Memphis Hustle | 22 | 18 | 4 | 82% | 120.1 | 108.8 | +11.3 |
| 2 |  Wisconsin Herd | 22 | 18 | 4 | 82% | 122.0 | 115.0 | +7.0 |
| 3 |  Salt Lake City Stars | 20 | 15 | 5 | 75% | 111.3 | 103.7 | +7.7 |
| 4 |  Maine Red Claws | 20 | 15 | 5 | 75% | 119.9 | 113.8 | +6.1 |
| 5 |  Canton Charge | 21 | 14 | 7 | 67% | 113.4 | 109.5 | +3.9 |
| 6 |  Delaware Blue Coats | 20 | 13 | 7 | 65% | 118.5 | 115.0 | +3.5 |
| 7 |  College Park Skyhawks | 23 | 14 | 9 | 61% | 111.8 | 110.0 | +1.8 |
| 8 |  Austin Toros Spurs | 23 | 14 | 9 | 61% | 113.9 | 112.8 | +1.1 |
| 9 |  Stockton Kings | 22 | 13 | 9 | 59% | 119.6 | 117.1 | +2.5 |
| 10 |  Grand Rapids Drive | 22 | 12 | 10 | 55% | 106.0 | 104.8 | +1.3 |
| 11 |  Texas Legends | 22 | 12 | 10 | 55% | 117.2 | 117.4 | -0.2 |
| 12 |  Santa Cruz Warriors | 22 | 12 | 10 | 55% | 109.2 | 110.5 | -1.3 |
| 13 |  Osceola Magic | 22 | 11 | 11 | 50% | 103.5 | 105.6 | -2.1 |
| 14 |  Capital City Go-Go | 21 | 10 | 11 | 48% | 112.0 | 112.9 | -0.9 |
| 15 |  San Diego Clippers | 21 | 10 | 11 | 48% | 106.9 | 108.8 | -1.9 |
| 16 |  Sioux Falls Skyforce | 22 | 10 | 12 | 45% | 105.9 | 106.8 | -0.9 |
| 17 |  Raptors 905 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 45% | 110.5 | 112.1 | -1.6 |
| 18 |  Iowa Wolves | 23 | 10 | 13 | 43% | 120.2 | 121.1 | -1.0 |
| 19 |  South Bay Lakers | 23 | 10 | 13 | 43% | 122.5 | 124.2 | -1.7 |
| 20 |  Windy City Bulls | 21 | 9 | 12 | 43% | 108.7 | 108.0 | +0.7 |
| 21 |  Westchester | 22 | 9 | 13 | 41% | 108.0 | 108.6 | -0.7 |
| 22 | IPFW | 22 | 8 | 14 | 36% | 108.2 | 111.9 | -3.7 |
| 23 |  Oklahoma City Blue | 23 | 8 | 15 | 35% | 110.6 | 111.4 | -0.8 |
| 24 |  Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 25 | 8 | 17 | 32% | 116.4 | 119.2 | -2.8 |
| 25 |  Erie BayHawks | 22 | 7 | 15 | 32% | 111.0 | 118.0 | -7.1 |
| 26 | Long Island Nets | 20 | 6 | 14 | 30% | 109.2 | 113.2 | -4.1 |
| 27 |  Northern Arizona Suns | 22 | 6 | 16 | 27% | 106.8 | 114.3 | -7.5 |
| 28 |  Greensboro Swarm | 22 | 4 | 18 | 18% | 114.0 | 121.0 | -7.0 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long Island Nets | 31 | 23 | 20 | 18 | 92 |
| IPFW | 32 | 24 | 16 | 28 | 100 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
