The Cleveland Charge will host the Sioux Falls Skyforce on 14 November 2026 in the NBA G League, with the Skyforce the model favourite as they lead the contest. Cleveland's single game this season ends 0-1, 122.0 points scored and 142.0 allowed, while Sioux Falls is undefeated 2-0, 125.0 points scored and 115.0 allowed, placing them fourth in the league; the Charge's lone home outing also yields a 0-1 record, 122.0 points and 142.0 allowed, whereas the Skyforce's two away games are 2-0, 125.0 points and 115.0 allowed. Cleveland's last five games feature one win and four losses, including a 122-142 defeat to Motor City Cruise, a 123-126 loss to Capital City Go-Go, and a 113-93 victory over Long Island Nets; Sioux Falls' recent five games include two wins, one loss, with back-to-back victories over Grand Rapids Gold (120-114 and 130-116) and a 132-140 loss to South Bay Lakers. Historically, the Skyforce have won six of the ten meetings, though Cleveland last beat them 141-111 on 13 December 2025. Pythia assigns a 42% chance to Cleveland and 58% to Sioux Falls, projecting a 116-119 score for a total of 234.8 points; the 237.5 over/under line carries a 44% over probability, and there is a 5% chance of overtime. The Skyforce's recent road dominance suggests they will likely edge the Charge in this encounter.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (1) | 122.0 | 142.0 | 264.0 | -20.0 | 0% |
| Season at home (1) | 122.0 | 142.0 | 264.0 | -20.0 | 0% |
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 118.0 | 121.0 | 239.0 | -3.0 | 40% |
| Last 5 (5) | 115.0 | 125.0 | 240.0 | -10.0 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (3) | 124.0 | 133.3 | 257.3 | -9.3 | 33% |
| vs Similar (9) | 120.0 | 116.8 | 236.8 | +3.2 | 56% |
| vs Weaker (18) | 124.6 | 116.3 | 240.9 | +8.3 | 72% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (2) | 125.0 | 115.0 | 240.0 | +10.0 | 100% |
| Season at home | no games | ||||
| Season away (2) | 125.0 | 115.0 | 240.0 | +10.0 | 100% |
| Last 10 (10) | 120.7 | 118.1 | 238.8 | +2.6 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 120.2 | 124.6 | 244.8 | -4.4 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (4) | 118.8 | 124.5 | 243.2 | -5.8 | 25% |
| vs Similar (15) | 116.7 | 111.7 | 228.4 | +5.1 | 53% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (11) | 119.0 | 112.9 | 231.9 | +6.1 | 55% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 118.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 60.8 | 61.8 | 122.6 | -0.9 | 53% | 57% |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 62.0 | 58.9 | 120.9 | +3.1 | 62% | 56% |
| Last 30 away (14) | 59.5 | 65.1 | 124.6 | -5.6 | 43% | 57% |
| Last 10 (10) | 59.1 | 61.7 | 120.8 | -2.6 | 40% | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 56.8 | 61.4 | 118.2 | -4.6 | 40% | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (3) | 61.7 | 71.3 | 133.0 | -9.7 | 33% | 100% |
| vs Similar (9) | 61.4 | 59.2 | 120.7 | +2.2 | 67% | 44% |
| vs Weaker (18) | 60.4 | 61.4 | 121.8 | -1.1 | 50% | 56% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 118.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 60.3 | 55.5 | 115.8 | +4.9 | 70% | 50% |
| Last 30 at home (15) | 61.9 | 54.7 | 116.6 | +7.1 | 73% | 40% |
| Last 30 away (15) | 58.8 | 56.2 | 115.0 | +2.6 | 67% | 60% |
| Last 10 (10) | 62.2 | 57.2 | 119.4 | +5.0 | 70% | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 62.4 | 61.4 | 123.8 | +1.0 | 60% | 80% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (4) | 62.8 | 61.2 | 124.0 | +1.5 | 25% | 75% |
| vs Similar (15) | 60.7 | 53.8 | 114.5 | +6.9 | 80% | 40% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (11) | 59.0 | 55.6 | 114.6 | +3.4 | 73% | 55% |
| Pick | Probability | Avg odds | Best 1 | Best 2 | Best 3 | Best 4 | Best 5 | Edge | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleveland Charge under 124.5 | 74.0% | 2.07 | 2.07 | - | - | - | - | +29.8pp | Lost |
| Cleveland Charge under 125.5 | 76.7% | 1.94 | 1.94 | - | - | - | - | +29.5pp | Lost |
| Cleveland Charge under 126.5 | 79.2% | 1.85 | 1.85 | - | - | - | - | +29.2pp | Lost |
| Cleveland Charge under 127.5 | 81.5% | 1.74 | 1.74 | - | - | - | - | +28.9pp | Lost |
| Cleveland Charge under 128.5 | 83.7% | 1.65 | 1.65 | - | - | - | - | +28.2pp | Lost |
| Sioux Falls Skyforce over 112.5 | 73.4% | 1.95 | 1.95 | - | - | - | - | +26.6pp | Won |
| Sioux Falls Skyforce over 113.5 | 70.6% | 2.08 | 2.08 | - | - | - | - | +26.5pp | Won |
| Sioux Falls Skyforce over 111.5 | 76.1% | 1.86 | 1.86 | - | - | - | - | +26.4pp | Won |
| Sioux Falls Skyforce over 110.5 | 78.6% | 1.75 | 1.75 | - | - | - | - | +26.3pp | Won |
| Sioux Falls Skyforce over 109.5 | 81.0% | 1.66 | 1.66 | - | - | - | - | +25.9pp | Won |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 14/12/25 | Cleveland Charge v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 141-111 |
| 19/11/25 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Cleveland Charge | 137-139 |
| 03/12/24 | Cleveland Charge v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 107-103 |
| 16/11/24 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Cleveland Charge | 110-96 |
| 15/11/24 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Cleveland Charge | 107-100 |
| 24/03/24 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Cleveland Charge | 113-111 |
| 24/03/24 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Cleveland Charge | 112-103 |
| 02/12/23 | Cleveland Charge v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 109-113 |
| 15/11/23 | Sioux Falls Skyforce v Cleveland Charge | 129-116 |
| 30/11/22 | Cleveland Charge v Sioux Falls Skyforce | 115-103 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/11/26 | H | Motor City Cruise | 122-142 |
| 01/04/26 | H | Capital City Go-Go | 123-126 |
| 28/03/26 | H | Long Island Nets | 113-93 |
| 26/03/26 | A | Noblesville Boom | 112-134 |
| 24/03/26 | A | Maine Celtics | 105-130 |
| 22/03/26 | A | Maine Celtics | 91-121 |
| 18/03/26 | H | Delaware Blue Coats | 124-141 |
| 17/03/26 | A | Westchester | 122-107 |
| 14/03/26 | H | Santa Cruz Warriors | 130-100 |
| 13/03/26 | H | Santa Cruz Warriors | 138-116 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/11/26 | A | Grand Rapids Gold | 120-114 |
| 08/11/26 | A | Grand Rapids Gold | 130-116 |
| 29/03/26 | A | South Bay Lakers | 132-140 |
| 27/03/26 | A | South Bay Lakers | 114-137 |
| 22/03/26 | H | Mexico City Capitanes | 105-116 |
| 21/03/26 | H | Mexico City Capitanes | 131-89 |
| 14/03/26 | H | Stockton Kings | 121-123 OT |
| 11/03/26 | H | Stockton Kings | 120-118 |
| 08/03/26 | H | Austin Toros Spurs | 118-119 |
| 08/03/26 | H | Austin Toros Spurs | 116-109 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | L | 0% |
| Home | L | 0% |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 1 | 1 | - |
| Win % | 0% | 0% | - |
| Points / game | 122.0 | 122.0 | - |
| Allowed / game | 142.0 | 142.0 | - |
| Point differential | -20.0 | -20.0 | - |
| Avg total | 264.0 | 264.0 | - |
| Over 237.5 | 100% | 100% | - |
| Win by 10+ | 0% | 0% | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | - |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WW | 100% |
| Home | - | - |
| Away | WW | 100% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 2 | - | 2 |
| Win % | 100% | - | 100% |
| Points / game | 125.0 | - | 125.0 |
| Allowed / game | 115.0 | - | 115.0 |
| Point differential | +10.0 | - | +10.0 |
| Avg total | 240.0 | - | 240.0 |
| Over 237.5 | 50% | - | 50% |
| Win by 10+ | 50% | - | 50% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | - | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 120.3 | 101.0 | +19.3 | |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 142.0 | 127.0 | +15.0 | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 125.3 | 114.3 | +11.0 | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 125.0 | 115.0 | +10.0 | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 102.3 | 93.7 | +8.7 | |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 118.5 | 113.0 | +5.5 | |
| 7 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75% | 117.0 | 109.5 | +7.5 | |
| 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75% | 115.8 | 109.2 | +6.5 | |
| 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75% | 123.5 | 121.0 | +2.5 | |
| 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 125.3 | 125.3 | +0.0 | |
| 11 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60% | 113.2 | 106.0 | +7.2 | |
| 12 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60% | 95.6 | 94.2 | +1.4 | |
| 13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 104.5 | 101.5 | +3.0 | |
| 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 129.5 | 128.0 | +1.5 | |
| 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 131.5 | 132.0 | -0.5 | |
| 16 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 117.0 | 117.5 | -0.5 | |
| 17 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50% | 118.8 | 125.0 | -6.2 | |
| 18 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40% | 119.0 | 120.0 | -1.0 | |
| 19 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 102.7 | 99.3 | +3.3 | |
| 20 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 109.7 | 108.0 | +1.7 | |
| 21 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 104.7 | 104.7 | +0.0 | |
| 22 | Rip City Remix | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 113.0 | 116.3 | -3.3 |
| 23 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 95.3 | 101.0 | -5.7 | |
| 24 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25% | 116.8 | 124.8 | -8.0 | |
| 25 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25% | 118.8 | 128.8 | -10.0 | |
| 26 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20% | 93.4 | 103.0 | -9.6 | |
| 27 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0% | 114.3 | 121.3 | -7.0 | |
| 28 | Valley Suns | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0% | 115.0 | 123.3 | -8.3 |
| 29 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0% | 94.0 | 107.7 | -13.7 | |
| 30 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 122.0 | 142.0 | -20.0 | |
| 31 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 122.0 | 147.0 | -25.0 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37 | 28 | 45 | 32 | 142 | |
| 34 | 41 | 38 | 35 | 148 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.