Duke hosts Army on 2 November 2026 in the NCAA, and the Pythia model names Duke the clear favourite, assigning it a 98% chance to win because of its dominant season record and high scoring average. Duke's home season shows 5 wins and 1 loss, with 86 points scored per game and 61 points allowed per game, and it has won four of its last five home games, including a 80-75 victory over St. John's and an 81-58 win over TCU, while its only loss was a 72-73 defeat to UConn. Army's away season is 1 win and 4 losses, with 61 points scored per game and 86 points allowed per game, and it has lost four of its last five away games, including a 55-65 loss to Bucknell and a 77-83 loss to Lafayette, with a 73-75 defeat at home to Bucknell. The teams have met three times, with Duke winning all three meetings, most recently 114-59 on 11 November 2025. Pythia projects a 86-61 score for the game, a total of 146.9 points, a 39% chance of the over on the 151.5 line, and a 0% overtime probability. The model's confidence in Duke's victory is reflected in the 98% home win probability and the 2% away win probability.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | no games | ||||
| Season at home | no games | ||||
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 77.7 | 65.7 | 143.4 | +12.0 | 90% |
| Last 5 (5) | 75.6 | 68.2 | 143.8 | +7.4 | 80% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar (2) | 67.5 | 64.5 | 132.0 | +3.0 | 100% |
| vs Weaker (28) | 79.7 | 65.0 | 144.7 | +14.8 | 89% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | no games | ||||
| Season at home | no games | ||||
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 67.0 | 74.1 | 141.1 | -7.1 | 20% |
| Last 5 (5) | 71.0 | 76.2 | 147.2 | -5.2 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (16) | 66.6 | 80.3 | 146.9 | -13.7 | 19% |
| vs Similar (13) | 75.6 | 77.0 | 152.6 | -1.4 | 46% |
| vs Weaker | no games | ||||
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 74.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 39.8 | 32.4 | 72.2 | +7.3 | 77% | 37% |
| Last 30 at home (20) | 39.6 | 33.0 | 72.7 | +6.6 | 80% | 35% |
| Last 30 away (10) | 40.0 | 31.3 | 71.3 | +8.7 | 70% | 40% |
| Last 10 (10) | 40.2 | 33.8 | 74.0 | +6.4 | 70% | 40% |
| Last 5 (5) | 38.2 | 36.4 | 74.6 | +1.8 | 60% | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar (2) | 35.5 | 28.5 | 64.0 | +7.0 | 100% | 0% |
| vs Weaker (28) | 40.1 | 32.7 | 72.8 | +7.4 | 75% | 39% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 74.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 32.5 | 36.3 | 68.9 | -3.8 | 33% | 27% |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 32.5 | 36.2 | 68.7 | -3.7 | 31% | 25% |
| Last 30 away (14) | 32.6 | 36.5 | 69.1 | -3.9 | 36% | 29% |
| Last 10 (10) | 29.0 | 34.6 | 63.6 | -5.6 | 20% | 0% |
| Last 5 (5) | 29.0 | 34.6 | 63.6 | -5.6 | 20% | 0% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (16) | 30.9 | 38.1 | 69.0 | -7.1 | 19% | 25% |
| vs Similar (13) | 33.5 | 34.9 | 68.4 | -1.5 | 46% | 31% |
| vs Weaker | no games | |||||
| Pick | Probability | Avg odds | Best 1 | Best 2 | Best 3 | Best 4 | Best 5 | Edge | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke under 91.5 | 70.1% | 3.67 | 4.50 | 2.85 | - | - | - | +44.0pp | Won |
| Under 156 | 72.0% | 1.97 | 2.00 | 1.97 | 1.95 | - | - | +24.8pp | Won |
| Under 157 | 74.0% | 1.89 | 1.90 | 1.89 | 1.87 | - | - | +24.6pp | Won |
| Under 155.5 | 70.4% | 1.91 | 2.05 | 2.02 | 1.99 | 1.85 | 1.83 | +24.3pp | Won |
| Under 156.5 | 72.5% | 1.92 | 1.95 | 1.93 | 1.93 | 1.91 | 1.90 | +24.3pp | Won |
| Under 158 | 76.1% | 1.77 | 1.79 | 1.79 | 1.74 | - | - | +24.2pp | Won |
| Under 157.5 | 74.6% | 1.84 | 1.86 | 1.85 | 1.85 | 1.84 | 1.84 | +24.0pp | Won |
| Under 159 | 78.0% | 1.69 | 1.71 | 1.70 | 1.66 | - | - | +23.7pp | Won |
| Under 158.5 | 76.5% | 1.68 | 1.76 | 1.75 | 1.73 | 1.68 | 1.47 | +23.6pp | Won |
| Army over 55 | 72.0% | 1.83 | 1.83 | - | - | - | - | +21.5pp | Lost |
| Under 160 | 79.8% | 1.61 | 1.65 | 1.58 | - | - | - | +21.4pp | Won |
| Under 161 | 81.5% | 1.52 | 1.52 | - | - | - | - | +20.3pp | Won |
| Under 162 | 83.2% | 1.45 | 1.45 | - | - | - | - | +19.0pp | Won |
| Under 163 | 84.7% | 1.40 | 1.40 | - | - | - | - | +18.5pp | Won |
| Under 161.5 | 81.9% | 1.47 | 1.47 | - | - | - | - | +18.4pp | Won |
| Under 162.5 | 83.4% | 1.41 | 1.41 | - | - | - | - | +17.8pp | Won |
| Under 163.5 | 84.9% | 1.37 | 1.37 | - | - | - | - | +17.4pp | Won |
| Under 159.5 | 78.4% | 1.57 | 1.66 | 1.62 | 1.42 | - | - | +17.1pp | Won |
| Under 164 | 86.2% | 1.34 | 1.34 | - | - | - | - | +16.7pp | Won |
| Under 160.5 | 80.2% | 1.46 | 1.55 | 1.37 | - | - | - | +16.5pp | Won |
| Under 165 | 87.5% | 1.30 | 1.30 | - | - | - | - | +16.1pp | Won |
| Under 164.5 | 86.4% | 1.32 | 1.32 | - | - | - | - | +15.9pp | Won |
| Under 165.5 | 87.7% | 1.28 | 1.28 | - | - | - | - | +15.3pp | Won |
| Under 167.5 | 90.0% | 1.20 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | +12.2pp | Won |
| Under 172.5 | 94.4% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | +8.9pp | Won |
| Under 169.5 | 92.0% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | +7.0pp | Won |
| Under 174.5 | 95.7% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +6.0pp | Won |
| Duke win | 98.3% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +2.0pp | Won |
| Over 129.5 | 86.1% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | -6.7pp | Won |
| Duke over 76.5 | 83.9% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | -9.8pp | Won |
| Over 132.5 | 81.5% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | -10.7pp | Won |
| Over 134.5 | 78.0% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | -11.6pp | Lost |
| Duke over 78.5 | 78.5% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | -13.0pp | Won |
| Over 137.5 | 72.1% | 1.05 | 1.05 | - | - | - | - | -16.9pp | Lost |
| Duke over 79.5 | 75.4% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | -18.3pp | Won |
| Duke over 80.5 | 72.1% | 1.03 | 1.03 | - | - | - | - | -18.3pp | Won |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 12/11/25 | Army v Duke | 59-114 |
| 08/11/24 | Duke v Army | 100-58 |
| 13/11/21 | Duke v Army | 82-56 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29/03/26 | H | Uconn | 72-73 |
| 27/03/26 | H | St. John's (N.Y.) | 80-75 |
| 21/03/26 | H | TCU | 81-58 |
| 19/03/26 | H | Siena | 71-65 |
| 15/03/26 | H | Virginia | 74-70 |
| 14/03/26 | H | Clemson | 73-61 |
| 12/03/26 | H | Florida State | 80-79 |
| 07/03/26 | H | North Carolina | 76-61 |
| 03/03/26 | A | NC State | 93-64 |
| 28/02/26 | H | Virginia | 77-51 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/03/26 | A | Bucknell | 55-65 |
| 28/02/26 | A | Lafayette | 77-83 |
| 25/02/26 | H | Bucknell | 73-75 |
| 21/02/26 | H | Navy | 63-81 |
| 19/02/26 | A | Loyola Maryland | 87-77 |
| 14/02/26 | A | American University | 63-75 |
| 11/02/26 | H | Boston University | 68-85 |
| 07/02/26 | H | Lafayette | 60-63 |
| 05/02/26 | A | Colgate | 55-69 |
| 31/01/26 | H | Holy Cross | 69-68 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | - | - |
| Home | - | - |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | - | - | - |
| Win % | - | - | - |
| Points / game | - | - | - |
| Allowed / game | - | - | - |
| Point differential | - | - | - |
| Avg total | - | - | - |
| Over 153.5 | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | - | - | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | - | - | - |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | - | - |
| Home | - | - |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | - | - | - |
| Win % | - | - | - |
| Points / game | - | - | - |
| Allowed / game | - | - | - |
| Point differential | - | - | - |
| Avg total | - | - | - |
| Over 153.5 | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | - | - | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | - | - | - |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | West Florida Argonauts | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 127.0 | 42.0 | +85.0 |
| 2 | Nicholls State | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 110.0 | 56.0 | +54.0 |
| 3 | Illinois (Chi.) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 96.0 | 47.0 | +49.0 |
| 4 | Hofstra | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 97.0 | 51.0 | +46.0 |
| 5 | Middle Tenn. St. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 117.0 | 73.0 | +44.0 |
| 6 | South Carolina St | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 94.0 | 55.0 | +39.0 |
| 7 | South Dakota Coyotes | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 95.0 | 57.0 | +38.0 |
| 8 | IU Indy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 113.0 | 76.0 | +37.0 |
| 9 | Mercer | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 90.0 | 53.0 | +37.0 |
| 10 | Princeton | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 78.0 | 46.0 | +32.0 |
| 11 | VMI | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 115.0 | 83.0 | +32.0 |
| 12 | Murray State | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 94.0 | 64.0 | +30.0 |
| 13 | George Mason | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 82.0 | 54.0 | +28.0 |
| 14 | McNeese State | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 99.0 | 78.0 | +21.0 |
| 15 | San Jose State | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 95.0 | 74.0 | +21.0 |
| 16 | Michigan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 84.0 | 68.0 | +16.0 |
| 17 | High Point | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 72.0 | 57.0 | +15.0 |
| 18 | Merrimack Warriors | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 63.0 | 49.0 | +14.0 |
| 19 | Florida | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 77.0 | 67.0 | +10.0 |
| 20 | Northern Kentucky | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 84.0 | 76.0 | +8.0 |
| 21 | Queens Royals | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 103.0 | 98.0 | +5.0 |
| 22 | Bowling Green | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 76.0 | 73.0 | +3.0 |
| 23 | Grambling St. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 89.0 | 87.0 | +2.0 |
| 24 | Notre Dame | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 74.0 | 72.0 | +2.0 |
| 25 | Cornell | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 86.0 | 85.0 | +1.0 |
| 26 | Pepperdine | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 85.0 | 86.0 | -1.0 |
| 27 | Northern Illinois | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 87.0 | 89.0 | -2.0 |
| 28 | Villanova | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 72.0 | 74.0 | -2.0 |
| 29 | Georgia State | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 73.0 | 76.0 | -3.0 |
| 30 | Winthrop | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 98.0 | 103.0 | -5.0 |
| 31 | UTEP | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 76.0 | 84.0 | -8.0 |
| 32 | Miami (FL) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 67.0 | 77.0 | -10.0 |
| 33 | Appalachian State | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 49.0 | 63.0 | -14.0 |
| 34 | Liberty | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 57.0 | 72.0 | -15.0 |
| 35 | Oakland | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 68.0 | 84.0 | -16.0 |
| 36 | UAB | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 78.0 | 99.0 | -21.0 |
| 37 | UTSA Roadrunners | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 74.0 | 95.0 | -21.0 |
| 38 | UMBC Retrievers | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 54.0 | 82.0 | -28.0 |
| 39 | Tennessee State | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 64.0 | 94.0 | -30.0 |
| 40 | Carnegie Mellon | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 46.0 | 78.0 | -32.0 |
| 41 | Virginia-Lynchburg | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 83.0 | 115.0 | -32.0 |
| 42 | Miami (OH) - Middletown | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 76.0 | 113.0 | -37.0 |
| 43 | Reinhardt | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 53.0 | 90.0 | -37.0 |
| 44 | Mount Marty | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 57.0 | 95.0 | -38.0 |
| 45 | Morris College | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 55.0 | 94.0 | -39.0 |
| 46 | Fisk | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 73.0 | 117.0 | -44.0 |
| 47 | St. Joseph's (Brooklyn) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 51.0 | 97.0 | -46.0 |
| 48 | St. Francis (ILL) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 47.0 | 96.0 | -49.0 |
| 49 | North American Stallions | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 56.0 | 110.0 | -54.0 |
| 50 | Southeastern Baptist College | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 42.0 | 127.0 | -85.0 |
| Team | 1H | 2H | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duke | 33 | 51 | 84 |
| Army | 18 | 32 | 50 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.