On 17 November 2026 the Houston Cougars will host the Rutgers Scarlet Knights in an NCAA matchup that the Pythia model deems a 99% win for Houston, a figure driven by Houston's 2-1 season record, 84.7 points scored and 62.3 allowed per game, and a perfect 2-0 home record with 93.0 points per game and 50.5 allowed, compared to Rutgers' undefeated 2-0 record, 91.0 points per game and 59.0 allowed, and a 4-1 record over the last five games; Houston's last five games include a 92-46 home win over Jacksonville State, a 68-86 away loss to California, and a 94-55 home win over La Salle, while Rutgers' recent results feature a 101-64 home win over NJIT, an 81-54 home win over New Haven Chargers, and a 59-72 away loss to UCLA. The only head-to-head meeting was in 2021 when Houston beat Rutgers 63-60, giving Houston a 1-0 advantage. Pythia projects a final score of 88-61 with a total of 148.2 points, giving Houston a 99% chance to win and Rutgers a 1% chance, and predicts an 88-61 outcome with no overtime expected. The projected score and win probabilities confirm Houston's dominant position in this contest.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (3) | 84.7 | 62.3 | 147.0 | +22.3 | 67% |
| Season at home (2) | 93.0 | 50.5 | 143.5 | +42.5 | 100% |
| Season away (1) | 68.0 | 86.0 | 154.0 | -18.0 | 0% |
| Last 10 (10) | 77.3 | 62.3 | 139.6 | +15.0 | 70% |
| Last 5 (5) | 79.4 | 61.8 | 141.2 | +17.6 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ | no games | ||||
| vs Similar (4) | 65.5 | 71.8 | 137.2 | -6.2 | 0% |
| vs Weaker (26) | 79.8 | 62.6 | 142.4 | +17.2 | 88% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (3) | 84.7 | 56.3 | 141.0 | +28.3 | 100% |
| Season at home (3) | 84.7 | 56.3 | 141.0 | +28.3 | 100% |
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 74.8 | 68.5 | 143.3 | +6.3 | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 77.0 | 61.6 | 138.6 | +15.4 | 80% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (20) | 69.3 | 80.6 | 149.9 | -11.3 | 20% |
| vs Similar (6) | 74.5 | 68.2 | 142.7 | +6.3 | 83% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (4) | 79.8 | 54.8 | 134.5 | +25.0 | 100% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 37.8 | 30.6 | 68.4 | +7.2 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 at home (18) | 38.3 | 26.4 | 64.7 | +11.9 | 72% | - |
| Last 30 away (12) | 37.1 | 36.9 | 74.0 | +0.2 | 42% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 37.9 | 31.6 | 69.5 | +6.3 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 37.6 | 28.2 | 65.8 | +9.4 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ | no games | |||||
| vs Similar (4) | 32.2 | 36.8 | 69.0 | -4.5 | 0% | - |
| vs Weaker (26) | 38.7 | 29.7 | 68.3 | +9.0 | 69% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 31.3 | 34.6 | 65.9 | -3.3 | 30% | - |
| Last 30 at home (16) | 34.1 | 33.3 | 67.4 | +0.8 | 44% | - |
| Last 30 away (14) | 28.1 | 36.1 | 64.2 | -8.1 | 14% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 33.7 | 28.5 | 62.2 | +5.2 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 34.6 | 28.2 | 62.8 | +6.4 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (20) | 28.9 | 38.3 | 67.2 | -9.3 | 10% | - |
| vs Similar (6) | 34.8 | 28.2 | 63.0 | +6.7 | 50% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (4) | 37.8 | 26.0 | 63.8 | +11.8 | 100% | - |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/11/26 | H | Jacksonville State | 92-46 |
| 09/11/26 | A | California | 68-86 |
| 03/11/26 | H | La Salle | 94-55 |
| 27/03/26 | H | Illinois | 55-65 |
| 21/03/26 | H | Texas A&M | 88-57 |
| 20/03/26 | H | Idaho | 78-47 |
| 14/03/26 | A | Arizona | 74-79 |
| 14/03/26 | H | Kansas | 69-47 |
| 12/03/26 | H | Brigham Young | 73-66 |
| 07/03/26 | A | Oklahoma State | 82-75 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13/11/26 | H | Bryant University | 72-51 |
| 10/11/26 | H | NJIT | 101-64 |
| 07/11/26 | H | New Haven Chargers | 81-54 |
| 13/03/26 | A | UCLA | 59-72 |
| 12/03/26 | A | Minnesota | 72-67 |
| 08/03/26 | H | Penn State | 74-62 |
| 06/03/26 | A | Michigan State | 87-91 |
| 01/03/26 | A | Maryland | 69-65 |
| 24/02/26 | H | Washington | 72-79 |
| 21/02/26 | A | Minnesota | 61-80 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLW | 67% |
| Home | WW | 100% |
| Away | L | 0% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Win % | 67% | 100% | 0% |
| Points / game | 84.7 | 93.0 | 68.0 |
| Allowed / game | 62.3 | 50.5 | 86.0 |
| Point differential | +22.3 | +42.5 | -18.0 |
| Avg total | 147.0 | 143.5 | 154.0 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 67% | 100% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WWW | 100% |
| Home | WWW | 100% |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 3 | 3 | - |
| Win % | 100% | 100% | - |
| Points / game | 84.7 | 84.7 | - |
| Allowed / game | 56.3 | 56.3 | - |
| Point differential | +28.3 | +28.3 | - |
| Avg total | 141.0 | 141.0 | - |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 100% | 100% | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | - |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 95.3 | 59.7 | +35.7 | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 85.7 | 53.3 | +32.3 | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 91.0 | 59.7 | +31.3 | |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 95.0 | 67.2 | +27.8 | |
| 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 85.5 | 63.2 | +22.2 | |
| 6 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 96.5 | 75.8 | +20.8 | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 78.7 | 59.3 | +19.3 | |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 72.7 | 61.3 | +11.3 | |
| 9 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 85.8 | 77.2 | +8.5 | |
| 10 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75% | 87.2 | 74.0 | +13.2 | |
| 11 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 84.7 | 62.3 | +22.3 | |
| 12 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 92.7 | 72.0 | +20.7 | |
| 13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 81.0 | 61.3 | +19.7 | |
| 14 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 73.7 | 60.0 | +13.7 | |
| 15 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 81.0 | 70.3 | +10.7 | |
| 16 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 83.3 | 76.0 | +7.3 |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 101.3 | 58.3 | +43.0 | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 89.0 | 60.7 | +28.3 | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 84.7 | 56.3 | +28.3 | |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 93.0 | 66.2 | +26.8 | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 95.0 | 68.7 | +26.3 | |
| 6 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 89.0 | 68.0 | +21.0 | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 79.0 | 58.0 | +21.0 | |
| 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 78.8 | 58.5 | +20.2 | |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 88.3 | 71.3 | +17.0 | |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 83.5 | 70.0 | +13.5 | |
| 11 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75% | 104.5 | 71.2 | +33.2 | |
| 12 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75% | 78.5 | 69.0 | +9.5 | |
| 13 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75% | 70.8 | 61.8 | +9.0 | |
| 14 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 85.0 | 64.7 | +20.3 | |
| 15 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 81.7 | 74.3 | +7.3 | |
| 16 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60% | 77.6 | 75.6 | +2.0 | |
| 17 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50% | 81.0 | 79.2 | +1.8 | |
| 18 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 84.3 | 80.0 | +4.3 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.