PythiaBasketballBETA
NCAA
Rutgers hosts Bryant University on 13 November 2026 in the NCAA, and the Pythia model names Rutgers the clear favourite, rating them 97% to win largely because of their undefeated 2-0 record, 91.0 points per game and 59.0 allowed per game, placing them 20th in the league, while Bryant sits 328th with a 1-3 record, 62.5 points per game and 71.8 allowed per game. Rutgers has won both of its games at home, averaging 91.0 points and conceding 59.0, and has won four of its last five games, including a 101-64 victory over NJIT and an 81-54 win over New Haven Chargers, though it lost 59-72 to UCLA away on 12 March 2026. Bryant's road record is 0-2, with 55.5 points per game and 72.0 allowed, and it has won only one of its last five games, suffering losses to Providence, Fairfield and Quinnipiac. The teams have met once before, with Rutgers winning 66-57 on 12 November 2023. Pythia projects a 84-61 score, a 145.0 total, and gives Rutgers a 97% chance to win, Bryant a 3% chance, and a 1% chance of overtime.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (2) | 91.0 | 59.0 | 150.0 | +32.0 | 100% |
| Season at home (2) | 91.0 | 59.0 | 150.0 | +32.0 | 100% |
| Season away | no games | ||||
| Last 10 (10) | 76.1 | 70.6 | 146.7 | +5.5 | 60% |
| Last 5 (5) | 77.4 | 63.8 | 141.2 | +13.6 | 80% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (21) | 68.9 | 80.8 | 149.7 | -12.0 | 19% |
| vs Similar (6) | 74.5 | 68.2 | 142.7 | +6.3 | 83% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (3) | 82.3 | 56.0 | 138.3 | +26.3 | 100% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (4) | 62.5 | 71.8 | 134.2 | -9.2 | 25% |
| Season at home (2) | 69.5 | 71.5 | 141.0 | -2.0 | 50% |
| Season away (2) | 55.5 | 72.0 | 127.5 | -16.5 | 0% |
| Last 10 (10) | 64.7 | 74.3 | 139.0 | -9.6 | 20% |
| Last 5 (5) | 61.4 | 72.8 | 134.2 | -11.4 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (19) | 61.1 | 73.9 | 135.0 | -12.9 | 16% |
| vs Similar (9) | 68.2 | 70.1 | 138.3 | -1.9 | 44% |
| vs Weaker (1) | 95.0 | 59.0 | 154.0 | +36.0 | 100% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 31.1 | 35.5 | 66.6 | -4.3 | 27% | - |
| Last 30 at home (15) | 34.1 | 33.5 | 67.5 | +0.6 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 away (15) | 28.2 | 37.5 | 65.7 | -9.3 | 13% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 34.1 | 27.4 | 61.5 | +6.7 | 50% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 36.2 | 26.2 | 62.4 | +10.0 | 60% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (21) | 29.0 | 39.1 | 68.1 | -10.1 | 10% | - |
| vs Similar (6) | 34.8 | 28.2 | 63.0 | +6.7 | 50% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (3) | 38.7 | 24.3 | 63.0 | +14.3 | 100% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 30.6 | 32.8 | 63.4 | -2.2 | 37% | - |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 33.6 | 30.1 | 63.7 | +3.6 | 64% | - |
| Last 30 away (16) | 28.0 | 35.2 | 63.2 | -7.2 | 12% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 29.9 | 34.3 | 64.2 | -4.4 | 30% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 29.6 | 35.2 | 64.8 | -5.6 | 20% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (19) | 28.8 | 36.2 | 65.1 | -7.4 | 16% | - |
| vs Similar (9) | 30.6 | 28.9 | 59.4 | +1.7 | 67% | - |
| vs Weaker (1) | 54.0 | 19.0 | 73.0 | +35.0 | 100% | - |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 12/11/23 | Rutgers v Bryant University | 66-57 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/26 | H | NJIT | 101-64 |
| 07/11/26 | H | New Haven Chargers | 81-54 |
| 13/03/26 | A | UCLA | 59-72 |
| 12/03/26 | A | Minnesota | 72-67 |
| 08/03/26 | H | Penn State | 74-62 |
| 06/03/26 | A | Michigan State | 87-91 |
| 01/03/26 | A | Maryland | 69-65 |
| 24/02/26 | H | Washington | 72-79 |
| 21/02/26 | A | Minnesota | 61-80 |
| 18/02/26 | A | Penn State | 85-72 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/11/26 | A | Providence | 55-78 |
| 08/11/26 | H | Fairfield | 59-68 |
| 06/11/26 | A | Quinnipiac | 56-66 |
| 03/11/26 | H | Siena | 80-75 |
| 07/03/26 | A | Vermont | 57-77 |
| 03/03/26 | A | New Hampshire Wildcats | 83-88 OT |
| 28/02/26 | H | NJIT | 69-52 |
| 26/02/26 | A | UMBC Retrievers | 58-70 |
| 19/02/26 | H | Binghamton | 67-79 |
| 14/02/26 | A | Vermont | 63-90 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WW | 100% |
| Home | WW | 100% |
| Away | - | - |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 2 | 2 | - |
| Win % | 100% | 100% | - |
| Points / game | 91.0 | 91.0 | - |
| Allowed / game | 59.0 | 59.0 | - |
| Point differential | +32.0 | +32.0 | - |
| Avg total | 150.0 | 150.0 | - |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 100% | 100% | - |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | - |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLLL | 25% |
| Home | WL | 50% |
| Away | LL | 0% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| Win % | 25% | 50% | 0% |
| Points / game | 62.5 | 69.5 | 55.5 |
| Allowed / game | 71.8 | 71.5 | 72.0 |
| Point differential | -9.2 | -2.0 | -16.5 |
| Avg total | 134.2 | 141.0 | 127.5 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 100% (1) | 100% (1) | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  UCLA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 101.3 | 58.3 | +43.0 |
| 2 | Rutgers | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 91.0 | 59.0 | +32.0 |
| 3 |  Nebraska | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 89.0 | 60.7 | +28.3 |
| 4 |  Oregon | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 95.0 | 68.7 | +26.3 |
| 5 |  Michigan State | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 88.7 | 64.3 | +24.3 |
| 6 |  Indiana | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 89.0 | 68.0 | +21.0 |
| 7 |  Wisconsin | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 79.0 | 58.0 | +21.0 |
| 8 |  Minnesota | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 78.8 | 58.5 | +20.2 |
| 9 |  Northwestern | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 78.7 | 60.0 | +18.7 |
| 10 |  USC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 88.3 | 71.3 | +17.0 |
| 11 |  Washington | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 83.5 | 70.0 | +13.5 |
| 12 |  Illinois | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 103.3 | 66.3 | +37.0 |
| 13 |  Iowa | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 85.0 | 64.7 | +20.3 |
| 14 |  Ohio State | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 85.3 | 77.7 | +7.7 |
| 15 |  Michigan | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 81.7 | 74.3 | +7.3 |
| 16 |  Purdue | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 78.0 | 71.3 | +6.7 |
| 17 |  Penn State | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60% | 77.6 | 75.6 | +2.0 |
| 18 |  Maryland | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 85.0 | 76.5 | +8.5 |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  UMass Lowell | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75% | 79.2 | 62.8 | +16.5 |
| 2 |  Binghamton | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75% | 70.0 | 66.5 | +3.5 |
| 3 |  UMBC Retrievers | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50% | 77.5 | 75.2 | +2.2 |
| 4 |  Vermont | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 70.0 | 67.3 | +2.7 |
| 5 | Bryant University | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25% | 62.5 | 71.8 | -9.2 |
| 6 |  Maine Black Bears | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25% | 64.2 | 73.5 | -9.2 |
| 7 |  NJIT | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20% | 54.8 | 80.2 | -25.4 |
| Team | 1H | 2H | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rutgers | 35 | 37 | 72 |
| Bryant University | 31 | 20 | 51 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
