Illinois State faces Bellarmine on 17 November 2026 in the NCAA, with the model declaring Illinois State the clear favourite thanks to a 97% win probability that reflects their 1-2 season record, 81.3 points scored per game and 73.7 allowed, and a perfect 1-0 home record with 100.0 points scored and 55.0 allowed. Bellarmine, meanwhile, sits at 1-3 with 72.0 points per game and 86.8 allowed, and has struggled on the road, going 0-3 and averaging 63.0 points while conceding 88.3. Illinois State's last five games show two wins and three losses, including a 100-55 home victory over Central State (OH) and a 59-76 loss to Purdue away, while Bellarmine's five-game stretch includes a single win over Franklin at home and three defeats away to Miami (Ohio), Indiana and a recent loss to Franklin. The head-to-head history is not recorded, so the matchup relies on current form. Pythia projects a 89-65 score, a total of 154.3 points, and a 1% chance of overtime, underscoring Illinois State's dominant statistical edge in this contest.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (3) | 81.3 | 73.7 | 155.0 | +7.7 | 33% |
| Season at home (1) | 100.0 | 55.0 | 155.0 | +45.0 | 100% |
| Season away (2) | 72.0 | 83.0 | 155.0 | -11.0 | 0% |
| Last 10 (10) | 72.8 | 72.0 | 144.8 | +0.8 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 75.4 | 73.8 | 149.2 | +1.6 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (2) | 81.5 | 86.5 | 168.0 | -5.0 | 0% |
| vs Similar (15) | 66.6 | 68.1 | 134.7 | -1.5 | 53% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (13) | 84.6 | 66.5 | 151.1 | +18.2 | 77% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (4) | 72.0 | 86.8 | 158.8 | -14.8 | 25% |
| Season at home (1) | 99.0 | 82.0 | 181.0 | +17.0 | 100% |
| Season away (3) | 63.0 | 88.3 | 151.3 | -25.3 | 0% |
| Last 10 (10) | 78.6 | 85.2 | 163.8 | -6.6 | 30% |
| Last 5 (5) | 72.2 | 86.6 | 158.8 | -14.4 | 20% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (13) | 75.0 | 85.8 | 160.8 | -10.8 | 15% |
| vs Similar (11) | 79.1 | 78.6 | 157.7 | +0.5 | 64% |
| vs Weaker (5) | 89.2 | 80.6 | 169.8 | +8.6 | 40% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 36.1 | 32.1 | 68.2 | +3.9 | 53% | - |
| Last 30 at home (17) | 39.3 | 28.8 | 68.1 | +10.5 | 71% | - |
| Last 30 away (13) | 31.8 | 36.5 | 68.3 | -4.6 | 31% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 34.3 | 33.4 | 67.7 | +0.9 | 40% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 37.6 | 34.6 | 72.2 | +3.0 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (2) | 36.0 | 36.5 | 72.5 | -0.5 | 50% | - |
| vs Similar (15) | 31.0 | 31.8 | 62.8 | -0.8 | 40% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (13) | 41.9 | 31.8 | 73.8 | +10.1 | 69% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 36.0 | 40.5 | 76.5 | -4.5 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 at home (15) | 39.4 | 36.3 | 75.7 | +3.1 | 67% | - |
| Last 30 away (15) | 32.6 | 44.6 | 77.2 | -12.0 | 13% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 35.7 | 40.4 | 76.1 | -4.7 | 30% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 32.6 | 40.6 | 73.2 | -8.0 | 20% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (13) | 32.8 | 43.8 | 76.7 | -11.0 | 23% | - |
| vs Similar (11) | 36.1 | 39.8 | 75.9 | -3.7 | 45% | - |
| vs Weaker (5) | 40.2 | 36.2 | 76.4 | +4.0 | 60% | - |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/26 | A | Purdue | 59-76 |
| 06/11/26 | H | Central State (OH) | 100-55 |
| 03/11/26 | A | St. Marys (CA) | 85-90 OT |
| 07/03/26 | H | Northern Iowa | 52-74 |
| 01/03/26 | H | Belmont | 81-74 |
| 26/02/26 | A | Northern Iowa | 71-69 |
| 22/02/26 | A | Bradley | 60-74 |
| 19/02/26 | H | Murray State | 78-61 |
| 15/02/26 | A | Illinois (Chi.) | 56-83 |
| 13/02/26 | H | Valparaiso | 86-64 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/11/26 | H | Franklin | 99-82 |
| 07/11/26 | A | Miami (Ohio) | 73-80 |
| 05/11/26 | A | Indiana | 69-92 |
| 03/11/26 | A | Vanderbilt | 47-93 |
| 06/03/26 | A | Central Arkansas | 73-86 |
| 04/03/26 | H | Jacksonville Dolphins | 82-79 |
| 28/02/26 | H | Austin Peay | 111-97 |
| 26/02/26 | A | North Alabama | 68-73 |
| 22/02/26 | H | Eastern Kentucky | 92-95 |
| 19/02/26 | H | Lipscomb | 72-75 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LWL | 33% |
| Home | W | 100% |
| Away | LL | 0% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Win % | 33% | 100% | 0% |
| Points / game | 81.3 | 100.0 | 72.0 |
| Allowed / game | 73.7 | 55.0 | 83.0 |
| Point differential | +7.7 | +45.0 | -11.0 |
| Avg total | 155.0 | 155.0 | 155.0 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 33% | 100% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 0% (1) | - | 0% (1) |
| Overtime % | 33% | 0% | 50% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLLW | 25% |
| Home | W | 100% |
| Away | LLL | 0% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| Win % | 25% | 100% | 0% |
| Points / game | 72.0 | 99.0 | 63.0 |
| Allowed / game | 86.8 | 82.0 | 88.3 |
| Point differential | -14.8 | +17.0 | -25.3 |
| Avg total | 158.8 | 181.0 | 151.3 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 25% | 100% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 88.0 | 58.0 | +30.0 | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 93.7 | 64.0 | +29.7 | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 85.7 | 58.3 | +27.3 | |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 74.0 | 62.3 | +11.7 | |
| 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 92.7 | 81.3 | +11.3 | |
| 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 77.3 | 73.0 | +4.3 | |
| 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 75.3 | 73.0 | +2.3 | |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 87.5 | 70.0 | +17.5 | |
| 9 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 81.3 | 73.7 | +7.7 | |
| 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 70.7 | 75.3 | -4.7 | |
| 11 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25% | 59.0 | 55.5 | +3.5 |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 94.0 | 69.0 | +25.0 | |
| 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 90.7 | 67.0 | +23.7 | |
| 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 86.7 | 65.7 | +21.0 | |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 75.7 | 74.0 | +1.7 | |
| 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50% | 74.8 | 78.5 | -3.8 | |
| 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50% | 87.2 | 102.2 | -15.0 | |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 85.3 | 81.0 | +4.3 | |
| 8 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 61.7 | 88.7 | -27.0 | |
| 9 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25% | 72.0 | 86.8 | -14.8 | |
| 10 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0% | 60.3 | 74.7 | -14.3 | |
| 11 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0% | 60.0 | 85.7 | -25.7 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.