PythiaBasketballBETA
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (33) | 97.0 | 95.1 | 192.1 | +1.8 | 52% |
| Season at home (19) | 97.4 | 95.8 | 193.2 | +1.5 | 47% |
| Season away (14) | 96.4 | 94.1 | 190.6 | +2.3 | 57% |
| Last 10 (10) | 97.0 | 96.8 | 193.8 | +0.2 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 99.4 | 98.8 | 198.2 | +0.6 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (6) | 97.3 | 98.5 | 195.8 | -1.2 | 33% |
| vs Similar (21) | 96.0 | 93.9 | 189.9 | +2.2 | 52% |
| vs Weaker (3) | 99.0 | 97.7 | 196.7 | +1.3 | 67% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (33) | 95.4 | 87.1 | 182.5 | +8.3 | 67% |
| Season at home (20) | 93.8 | 84.0 | 177.8 | +9.7 | 70% |
| Season away (13) | 97.8 | 91.8 | 189.6 | +6.1 | 62% |
| Last 10 (10) | 89.6 | 89.4 | 179.0 | +0.2 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 87.2 | 87.2 | 174.4 | +0.0 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger | no games | ||||
| vs Similar (13) | 89.8 | 89.8 | 179.6 | -0.1 | 46% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (17) | 98.4 | 83.9 | 182.4 | +14.5 | 82% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 47.8 | 49.1 | 96.9 | -1.2 | 30% | - |
| Last 30 at home (17) | 47.4 | 48.1 | 95.5 | -0.6 | 35% | - |
| Last 30 away (13) | 48.4 | 50.4 | 98.8 | -2.0 | 23% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 48.5 | 48.4 | 96.9 | +0.1 | 40% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 51.6 | 53.4 | 105.0 | -1.8 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ (6) | 50.2 | 48.7 | 98.8 | +1.5 | 50% | - |
| vs Similar (21) | 47.3 | 49.0 | 96.4 | -1.7 | 29% | - |
| vs Weaker (3) | 46.7 | 50.0 | 96.7 | -3.3 | 0% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 47.5 | 42.6 | 90.1 | +5.0 | 67% | - |
| Last 30 at home (19) | 46.9 | 40.9 | 87.9 | +6.0 | 74% | - |
| Last 30 away (11) | 48.5 | 45.4 | 93.9 | +3.2 | 55% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 49.0 | 45.3 | 94.3 | +3.7 | 60% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 49.2 | 43.8 | 93.0 | +5.4 | 80% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger | no games | |||||
| vs Similar (13) | 46.0 | 45.7 | 91.7 | +0.3 | 46% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (17) | 48.7 | 40.2 | 88.9 | +8.5 | 82% | - |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 05/03/11 | Philadelphia 76ers v Minnesota Timberwolves | 111-100 |
| 13/02/11 | Minnesota Timberwolves v Philadelphia 76ers | 87-107 |
| 10/02/10 | Philadelphia 76ers v Minnesota Timberwolves | 119-97 |
| 18/01/10 | Minnesota Timberwolves v Philadelphia 76ers | 108-103 OT |
| 25/03/09 | Philadelphia 76ers v Minnesota Timberwolves | 96-88 |
| 20/11/08 | Minnesota Timberwolves v Philadelphia 76ers | 102-96 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18/02/12 | A | Houston Rockets | 111-98 |
| 16/02/12 | H | Charlotte Hornets | 102-90 |
| 14/02/12 | A | Orlando Magic | 89-102 |
| 12/02/12 | H | New York Knicks | 98-100 |
| 11/02/12 | H | Dallas Mavericks | 97-104 |
| 09/02/12 | A | Memphis Grizzlies | 80-85 |
| 08/02/12 | H | Sacramento Kings | 86-84 |
| 05/02/12 | H | Houston Rockets | 100-91 |
| 04/02/12 | A | Brooklyn Nets | 108-105 |
| 02/02/12 | H | Indiana Pacers | 99-109 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18/02/12 | H | Dallas Mavericks | 75-82 |
| 16/02/12 | A | Orlando Magic | 87-103 |
| 14/02/12 | A | Charlotte Hornets | 98-89 |
| 12/02/12 | A | Cleveland Cavaliers | 99-84 |
| 11/02/12 | H | Los Angeles Clippers | 77-78 |
| 09/02/12 | H | San Antonio Spurs | 90-100 |
| 07/02/12 | H | Los Angeles Lakers | 95-90 |
| 05/02/12 | A | Atlanta Hawks | 98-87 |
| 04/02/12 | H | Miami Heat | 79-99 |
| 02/02/12 | H | Chicago Bulls | 98-82 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LLLWW | 52% |
| Home | WWLLW | 47% |
| Away | WWLLW | 57% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 33 | 19 | 14 |
| Win % | 52% | 47% | 57% |
| Points / game | 97.0 | 97.4 | 96.4 |
| Allowed / game | 95.1 | 95.8 | 94.1 |
| Point differential | +1.8 | +1.5 | +2.3 |
| Avg total | 192.1 | 193.2 | 190.6 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 27% | 26% | 29% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 33% (12) | 17% (6) | 50% (6) |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LWWLL | 67% |
| Home | LWLLL | 70% |
| Away | LWWWL | 62% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 33 | 20 | 13 |
| Win % | 67% | 70% | 62% |
| Points / game | 95.4 | 93.8 | 97.8 |
| Allowed / game | 87.1 | 84.0 | 91.8 |
| Point differential | +8.3 | +9.7 | +6.1 |
| Avg total | 182.5 | 177.8 | 189.6 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 52% | 55% | 46% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 33% (6) | 50% (4) | 0% (2) |
| Overtime % | 6% | 10% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Oklahoma City Thunder | 32 | 25 | 7 | 78% | 101.2 | 95.2 | +6.0 |
| 2 |  Chicago Bulls | 35 | 27 | 8 | 77% | 97.0 | 87.9 | +9.1 |
| 3 |  Miami Heat | 34 | 26 | 8 | 76% | 103.6 | 94.2 | +9.4 |
| 4 |  San Antonio Spurs | 33 | 23 | 10 | 70% | 98.3 | 94.2 | +4.1 |
| 5 |  Los Angeles Clippers | 31 | 21 | 10 | 68% | 98.6 | 95.2 | +3.5 |
| 6 | Philadelphia 76ers | 33 | 22 | 11 | 67% | 95.4 | 87.1 | +8.3 |
| 7 |  Orlando Magic | 34 | 21 | 13 | 62% | 93.2 | 92.1 | +1.0 |
| 8 |  Atlanta Hawks | 33 | 20 | 13 | 61% | 93.9 | 91.0 | +2.9 |
| 9 |  Dallas Mavericks | 34 | 20 | 14 | 59% | 94.2 | 91.5 | +2.7 |
| 10 |  Denver Nuggets | 33 | 19 | 14 | 58% | 104.3 | 99.9 | +4.4 |
| 11 |  Indiana Pacers | 33 | 19 | 14 | 58% | 94.1 | 92.3 | +1.8 |
| 12 |  Los Angeles Lakers | 32 | 18 | 14 | 56% | 93.5 | 92.0 | +1.5 |
| 13 |  Houston Rockets | 33 | 18 | 15 | 55% | 97.6 | 96.4 | +1.2 |
| 14 |  Boston Celtics | 32 | 17 | 15 | 53% | 88.8 | 86.7 | +2.1 |
| 15 |  Portland Trail Blazers | 34 | 18 | 16 | 53% | 97.6 | 92.5 | +5.0 |
| 16 |  New York Knicks | 34 | 18 | 16 | 53% | 95.1 | 93.4 | +1.7 |
| 17 |  Memphis Grizzlies | 34 | 18 | 16 | 53% | 93.1 | 92.7 | +0.4 |
| 18 |  Utah Jazz | 31 | 16 | 15 | 52% | 95.9 | 97.3 | -1.4 |
| 19 | Minnesota Timberwolves | 33 | 17 | 16 | 52% | 97.0 | 95.1 | +1.8 |
| 20 |  Cleveland Cavaliers | 31 | 13 | 18 | 42% | 93.6 | 96.9 | -3.4 |
| 21 |  Golden State Warriors | 30 | 12 | 18 | 40% | 98.8 | 100.4 | -1.6 |
| 22 |  Milwaukee Bucks | 32 | 12 | 20 | 38% | 94.6 | 97.1 | -2.5 |
| 23 |  Phoenix Suns | 33 | 12 | 21 | 36% | 94.0 | 98.6 | -4.6 |
| 24 |  Detroit Pistons | 35 | 12 | 23 | 34% | 88.8 | 95.2 | -6.4 |
| 25 |  Sacramento Kings | 33 | 11 | 22 | 33% | 93.3 | 101.2 | -7.9 |
| 26 |  New Orleans Pelicans | 32 | 9 | 23 | 28% | 87.8 | 92.0 | -4.2 |
| 27 |  Toronto Raptors | 34 | 9 | 25 | 26% | 87.9 | 93.4 | -5.5 |
| 28 |  Brooklyn Nets | 34 | 9 | 25 | 26% | 92.0 | 98.9 | -6.9 |
| 29 |  Washington Wizards | 33 | 7 | 26 | 21% | 91.1 | 100.4 | -9.2 |
| 30 |  Charlotte Hornets | 33 | 5 | 28 | 15% | 85.9 | 99.8 | -13.9 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Timberwolves | 22 | 22 | 28 | 20 | 92 |
| Philadelphia 76ers | 24 | 25 | 25 | 17 | 91 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.
