St. Marys (CA) will host Portland State on 16 November 2026 in the NCAA, and the Pythia model names St. Marys (CA) the clear favourite with a 90% chance of victory, reflecting their 3-1 season record, 93.5 points per game and only 76.5 points allowed, while Portland State sits 2-2 with 81.5 points per game and 73.2 allowed. St. Marys (CA) are unbeaten at home, 3-0, averaging 93.0 points and conceding 70.0, and have won three of their last five games; they beat Illinois (Chi.) 84-61 at home on 13 November, lost to Nevada 95-96 away on 8 November, and beat North Dakota St 105-64 at home on 4 November. Portland State's road record is 1-2, with 71.7 points per game and 78.0 allowed, and they have won two of their last five; they beat San Francisco 84-68 away on 14 November, lost to Colorado State 71-87 away on 11 November, and lost to Seattle 60-79 away on 7 November. The Pythia model projects an 80-66 score, 146.3 total points, and a 2% chance of overtime, with St. Marys (CA) covering the spread. The final game-day result will confirm whether the projected margin holds.
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (4) | 93.5 | 76.5 | 170.0 | +17.0 | 75% |
| Season at home (3) | 93.0 | 70.0 | 163.0 | +23.0 | 100% |
| Season away (1) | 95.0 | 96.0 | 191.0 | -1.0 | 0% |
| Last 10 (10) | 80.6 | 70.8 | 151.4 | +9.8 | 70% |
| Last 5 (5) | 84.8 | 73.8 | 158.6 | +11.0 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (2) | 67.5 | 66.0 | 133.5 | +1.5 | 50% |
| vs Similar (5) | 73.2 | 72.4 | 145.6 | +0.8 | 40% |
| vs Weaker ◀ (23) | 79.7 | 66.5 | 146.2 | +13.2 | 87% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (4) | 81.5 | 73.2 | 154.8 | +8.2 | 50% |
| Season at home (1) | 111.0 | 59.0 | 170.0 | +52.0 | 100% |
| Season away (3) | 71.7 | 78.0 | 149.7 | -6.3 | 33% |
| Last 10 (10) | 75.9 | 73.1 | 149.0 | +2.8 | 40% |
| Last 5 (5) | 79.6 | 73.6 | 153.2 | +6.0 | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger ◀ | no games | ||||
| vs Similar (12) | 72.4 | 72.6 | 145.0 | -0.2 | 50% |
| vs Weaker (16) | 73.4 | 69.2 | 142.6 | +4.1 | 69% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 36.3 | 32.0 | 68.3 | +4.3 | 67% | - |
| Last 30 at home (17) | 38.1 | 30.8 | 68.9 | +7.3 | 76% | - |
| Last 30 away (13) | 33.9 | 33.6 | 67.5 | +0.3 | 54% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 36.2 | 33.9 | 70.1 | +2.3 | 60% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 36.2 | 33.6 | 69.8 | +2.6 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (2) | 33.5 | 35.0 | 68.5 | -1.5 | 50% | - |
| vs Similar (5) | 35.6 | 35.0 | 70.6 | +0.6 | 60% | - |
| vs Weaker ◀ (23) | 36.7 | 31.1 | 67.8 | +5.6 | 70% | - |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over main line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 33.3 | 30.8 | 64.1 | +2.5 | 43% | - |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 35.4 | 29.3 | 64.7 | +6.1 | 57% | - |
| Last 30 away (16) | 31.4 | 32.1 | 63.6 | -0.7 | 31% | - |
| Last 10 (10) | 34.7 | 33.2 | 67.9 | +1.5 | 30% | - |
| Last 5 (5) | 35.2 | 33.2 | 68.4 | +2.0 | 40% | - |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger ◀ | no games | |||||
| vs Similar (12) | 31.0 | 32.8 | 63.8 | -1.8 | 33% | - |
| vs Weaker (16) | 32.9 | 30.1 | 62.9 | +2.8 | 44% | - |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14/11/26 | H | Illinois (Chi.) | 84-61 |
| 08/11/26 | A | Nevada | 95-96 OT |
| 05/11/26 | H | North Dakota St | 105-64 |
| 03/11/26 | H | Illinois State | 90-85 OT |
| 19/03/26 | H | Texas A&M | 50-63 |
| 10/03/26 | H | Santa Clara | 71-76 |
| 01/03/26 | H | Gonzaga | 70-59 |
| 26/02/26 | H | Santa Clara | 86-67 |
| 22/02/26 | A | Washington State | 83-67 |
| 19/02/26 | A | Seattle | 72-70 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15/11/26 | A | San Francisco | 84-68 |
| 12/11/26 | A | Colorado State | 71-87 |
| 08/11/26 | A | Seattle | 60-79 |
| 04/11/26 | H | Lewis & Clark College | 111-59 |
| 11/03/26 | H | Montana | 72-75 |
| 08/03/26 | H | Idaho State | 85-78 |
| 03/03/26 | H | Weber State | 84-60 |
| 28/02/26 | A | Montana | 68-74 |
| 27/02/26 | A | Montana State | 69-84 |
| 21/02/26 | H | East. Washington | 55-67 |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WWLW | 75% |
| Home | WWW | 100% |
| Away | L | 0% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| Win % | 75% | 100% | 0% |
| Points / game | 93.5 | 93.0 | 95.0 |
| Allowed / game | 76.5 | 70.0 | 96.0 |
| Point differential | +17.0 | +23.0 | -1.0 |
| Avg total | 170.0 | 163.0 | 191.0 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 50% | 67% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 50% (2) | 100% (1) | 0% (1) |
| Overtime % | 50% | 33% | 100% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WLLW | 50% |
| Home | W | 100% |
| Away | LLW | 33% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| Win % | 50% | 100% | 33% |
| Points / game | 81.5 | 111.0 | 71.7 |
| Allowed / game | 73.2 | 59.0 | 78.0 |
| Point differential | +8.2 | +52.0 | -6.3 |
| Avg total | 154.8 | 170.0 | 149.7 |
| Over main line | - | - | - |
| Win by 10+ | 50% | 100% | 33% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | - | - | - |
| Overtime % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 93.2 | 69.5 | +23.8 | |
| 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100% | 86.6 | 75.0 | +11.6 | |
| 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75% | 93.5 | 76.5 | +17.0 | |
| 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75% | 84.2 | 75.5 | +8.8 | |
| 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75% | 71.5 | 68.5 | +3.0 | |
| 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67% | 74.7 | 53.7 | +21.0 | |
| 7 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50% | 96.0 | 70.0 | +26.0 | |
| 8 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40% | 87.0 | 93.6 | -6.6 | |
| 9 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 87.0 | 75.7 | +11.3 | |
| 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 70.3 | 73.3 | -3.0 | |
| 11 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25% | 84.5 | 74.8 | +9.8 | |
| 12 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25% | 81.5 | 79.5 | +2.0 |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50% | 86.5 | 71.5 | +15.0 | |
| 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50% | 78.0 | 65.2 | +12.8 | |
| 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50% | 82.0 | 69.2 | +12.8 | |
| 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50% | 81.5 | 73.2 | +8.2 | |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 74.3 | 77.3 | -3.0 | |
| 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33% | 76.0 | 80.0 | -4.0 | |
| 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25% | 80.5 | 83.5 | -3.0 | |
| 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25% | 74.5 | 86.2 | -11.8 | |
| 9 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0% | 69.5 | 87.8 | -18.2 | |
| 10 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0% | 67.3 | 92.0 | -24.7 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.