| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (6) | 85.5 | 90.5 | 176.0 | -5.0 | 17% |
| Season at home (2) | 88.5 | 90.0 | 178.5 | -1.5 | 50% |
| Season away (4) | 84.0 | 90.8 | 174.8 | -6.8 | 0% |
| Last 10 (10) | 87.2 | 84.4 | 171.6 | +2.8 | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 90.0 | 81.8 | 171.8 | +8.2 | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (10) | 73.7 | 80.2 | 153.9 | -6.5 | 30% |
| vs Similar ◀ (10) | 83.9 | 84.0 | 167.9 | -0.1 | 50% |
| vs Weaker (10) | 89.7 | 85.0 | 174.7 | +4.7 | 70% |
| Split | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season (6) | 88.7 | 86.7 | 175.3 | +2.0 | 67% |
| Season at home (3) | 81.7 | 80.0 | 161.7 | +1.7 | 67% |
| Season away (3) | 95.7 | 93.3 | 189.0 | +2.3 | 67% |
| Last 10 (10) | 83.6 | 87.0 | 170.6 | -3.4 | 40% |
| Last 5 (5) | 91.0 | 86.8 | 177.8 | +4.2 | 80% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | |||||
| vs Stronger (11) | 78.0 | 89.0 | 167.0 | -11.0 | 27% |
| vs Similar ◀ (13) | 81.5 | 81.6 | 163.1 | -0.2 | 54% |
| vs Weaker (6) | 91.0 | 79.8 | 170.8 | +11.2 | 83% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 85.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 42.1 | 40.0 | 82.1 | +2.1 | 57% | 43% |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 44.6 | 37.8 | 82.4 | +6.8 | 71% | 43% |
| Last 30 away (16) | 39.9 | 41.9 | 81.8 | -1.9 | 44% | 44% |
| Last 10 (10) | 42.8 | 41.5 | 84.3 | +1.3 | 60% | 50% |
| Last 5 (5) | 44.2 | 40.2 | 84.4 | +4.0 | 80% | 60% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (10) | 40.8 | 40.5 | 81.3 | +0.3 | 50% | 40% |
| vs Similar ◀ (10) | 42.9 | 39.5 | 82.4 | +3.4 | 60% | 40% |
| vs Weaker (10) | 42.6 | 39.9 | 82.5 | +2.7 | 60% | 50% |
| 1st half | Scored | Allowed | Total | Margin | Won the half | Over 85.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 30 (30) | 39.7 | 42.1 | 81.8 | -2.5 | 43% | 33% |
| Last 30 at home (14) | 40.6 | 39.4 | 80.1 | +1.2 | 64% | 29% |
| Last 30 away (16) | 38.8 | 44.5 | 83.3 | -5.7 | 25% | 38% |
| Last 10 (10) | 37.7 | 42.3 | 80.0 | -4.6 | 30% | 30% |
| Last 5 (5) | 41.2 | 42.4 | 83.6 | -1.2 | 60% | 40% |
| Last 30 games by opponent strength | ||||||
| vs Stronger (11) | 38.4 | 45.3 | 83.6 | -6.9 | 18% | 45% |
| vs Similar ◀ (13) | 40.2 | 40.8 | 80.9 | -0.6 | 62% | 23% |
| vs Weaker (6) | 41.0 | 39.3 | 80.3 | +1.7 | 50% | 33% |
| Pick | Probability | Avg odds | Best 1 | Best 2 | Best 3 | Best 4 | Best 5 | Edge | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st half: Under 89.5 | 72.9% | 1.55 | 1.55 | - | - | - | - | +14.0pp | Lost |
| Under 177 | 73.4% | 1.53 | 1.55 | 1.51 | - | - | - | +13.6pp | Won |
| Under 176 | 71.4% | 1.58 | 1.60 | 1.58 | 1.56 | - | - | +13.4pp | Won |
| Under 176.5 | 72.0% | 1.55 | 1.57 | 1.55 | 1.54 | 1.53 | - | +13.0pp | Won |
| Under 179 | 77.1% | 1.44 | 1.45 | 1.42 | - | - | - | +12.9pp | Won |
| 1st half: Under 90.5 | 75.8% | 1.46 | 1.50 | 1.43 | - | - | - | +12.8pp | Lost |
| Under 180 | 78.8% | 1.39 | 1.40 | 1.38 | - | - | - | +12.8pp | Won |
| Under 178 | 75.2% | 1.48 | 1.50 | 1.46 | - | - | - | +12.7pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 91.5 | 71.1% | 1.53 | 1.58 | 1.52 | 1.50 | - | - | +11.9pp | Lost |
| Under 179.5 | 77.5% | 1.41 | 1.43 | 1.40 | 1.39 | - | - | +11.8pp | Won |
| Under 177.5 | 73.9% | 1.48 | 1.52 | 1.49 | 1.47 | 1.46 | - | +11.7pp | Won |
| Under 178.5 | 75.7% | 1.44 | 1.47 | 1.44 | 1.42 | - | - | +11.6pp | Won |
| Under 180.5 | 79.1% | 1.36 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 1.35 | - | - | +11.5pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 97.5 | 86.6% | 1.23 | 1.23 | - | - | - | - | +11.3pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 93.5 | 77.1% | 1.40 | 1.44 | 1.35 | - | - | - | +11.3pp | Lost |
| 1st half: Under 92.5 | 81.4% | 1.32 | 1.32 | - | - | - | - | +10.9pp | Won |
| Under 182.5 | 82.3% | 1.29 | 1.31 | 1.28 | - | - | - | +10.7pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 98.5 | 88.5% | 1.20 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | +10.7pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 99.5 | 90.2% | 1.16 | 1.16 | - | - | - | - | +10.7pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 95.5 | 82.3% | 1.28 | 1.32 | 1.24 | - | - | - | +10.6pp | Won |
| Under 181.5 | 80.7% | 1.31 | 1.31 | - | - | - | - | +10.4pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 92.5 | 74.2% | 1.42 | 1.42 | - | - | - | - | +10.4pp | Lost |
| 1st half: Chemnitz under 48.5 | 79.3% | 1.35 | 1.35 | - | - | - | - | +10.4pp | Won |
| Q1: Under 45.5 | 70.8% | 1.54 | 1.57 | 1.50 | - | - | - | +10.4pp | Won |
| 1st half: Chemnitz under 50.5 | 86.4% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | +10.3pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 94.5 | 79.8% | 1.29 | 1.29 | - | - | - | - | +9.9pp | Won |
| 1st half: Under 94.5 | 85.9% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | +9.8pp | Won |
| Under 187.5 | 88.6% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +9.7pp | Won |
| 1st half: Chemnitz under 52.5 | 91.9% | 1.13 | 1.13 | - | - | - | - | +9.7pp | Won |
| Q1: Chemnitz under 24.5 | 73.4% | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.43 | - | - | - | +9.6pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg under 44.5 | 71.5% | 1.48 | 1.50 | 1.47 | - | - | - | +9.5pp | Lost |
| 1st half: Under 96.5 | 89.9% | 1.15 | 1.15 | - | - | - | - | +9.4pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 87.5 | 71.4% | 1.48 | 1.54 | 1.42 | - | - | - | +9.3pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 91.5 | 82.2% | 1.25 | 1.28 | 1.23 | - | - | - | +9.2pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 89.5 | 77.2% | 1.35 | 1.40 | 1.30 | - | - | - | +9.2pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 101.5 | 93.0% | 1.11 | 1.11 | - | - | - | - | +9.2pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg under 46.5 | 80.3% | 1.30 | 1.30 | - | - | - | - | +8.9pp | Lost |
| Q1: Under 49.5 | 86.6% | 1.20 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | +8.8pp | Won |
| Q1: Chemnitz under 26.5 | 85.0% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | +8.8pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 95.5 | 89.9% | 1.14 | 1.14 | - | - | - | - | +8.5pp | Won |
| Q1: Under 47.5 | 79.5% | 1.31 | 1.31 | - | - | - | - | +8.5pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 103.5 | 95.1% | 1.08 | 1.08 | - | - | - | - | +8.5pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg under 48.5 | 87.2% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +8.4pp | Won |
| Q1: Ludwigsburg under 23.5 | 74.1% | 1.38 | 1.38 | - | - | - | - | +8.3pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 92.5 | 84.5% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | +8.3pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 105.5 | 96.7% | 1.05 | 1.05 | - | - | - | - | +8.0pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg under 47.5 | 84.1% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | +7.9pp | Lost |
| Ludwigsburg under 88.5 | 74.4% | 1.38 | 1.40 | 1.35 | - | - | - | +7.9pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 94.5 | 88.3% | 1.15 | 1.15 | - | - | - | - | +7.8pp | Won |
| 1st half: Chemnitz under 54.5 | 95.2% | 1.07 | 1.07 | - | - | - | - | +7.7pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 93.5 | 86.5% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +7.6pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 90.5 | 79.8% | 1.27 | 1.29 | 1.25 | - | - | - | +7.6pp | Won |
| Under 192.5 | 93.0% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | +7.5pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 108.5 | 98.2% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +7.5pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 107.5 | 97.8% | 1.03 | 1.03 | - | - | - | - | +7.3pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg under 45.5 | 76.1% | 1.35 | 1.35 | - | - | - | - | +7.2pp | Lost |
| Ludwigsburg under 97.5 | 92.7% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | +7.2pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg under 50.5 | 92.2% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | +7.1pp | Won |
| Chemnitz under 109.5 | 98.6% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +7.0pp | Won |
| Q1: Chemnitz under 30.5 | 96.6% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +7.0pp | Won |
| Q1: Chemnitz under 28.5 | 92.5% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | +7.0pp | Won |
| Under 197.5 | 95.9% | 1.05 | 1.05 | - | - | - | - | +6.9pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg under 52.5 | 95.6% | 1.05 | 1.05 | - | - | - | - | +6.9pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 99.5 | 94.8% | 1.06 | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | +6.8pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 100.5 | 96.2% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +6.8pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 101.5 | 96.4% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +6.7pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg under 49.5 | 89.8% | 1.12 | 1.12 | - | - | - | - | +6.7pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 102.5 | 97.4% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +6.7pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 98.5 | 94.5% | 1.06 | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | +6.5pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 105.5 | 98.4% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +6.1pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg under 51.5 | 94.1% | 1.06 | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | +6.1pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 103.5 | 97.5% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +6.0pp | Won |
| Q1: Chemnitz under 32.5 | 98.7% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +5.9pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 96.5 | 91.4% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | +5.9pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg under 104.5 | 98.0% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +5.8pp | Won |
| Q1: Ludwigsburg under 28.5 | 94.9% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +5.3pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg +25.5 | 95.6% | 1.03 | 1.03 | - | - | - | - | +5.2pp | Won |
| Q1: Ludwigsburg under 26.5 | 89.4% | 1.11 | 1.11 | - | - | - | - | +5.0pp | Won |
| Q1: Ludwigsburg under 30.5 | 97.8% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +5.0pp | Won |
| Q1: Ludwigsburg under 24.5 | 80.0% | 1.23 | 1.23 | - | - | - | - | +4.7pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg +30.5 | 98.1% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +4.5pp | Won |
| Q1: Chemnitz over 12.5 | 96.4% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +4.1pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg over 62.5 | 96.9% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +4.1pp | Won |
| Q1: Ludwigsburg +7.5 | 81.7% | 1.20 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | +3.9pp | Won |
| Chemnitz +20.5 | 96.6% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +3.8pp | Won |
| Q1: Ludwigsburg over 10.5 | 97.4% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +3.7pp | Won |
| Q1: Ludwigsburg over 12.5 | 94.0% | 1.03 | 1.03 | - | - | - | - | +3.6pp | Won |
| Chemnitz +7.5 | 81.2% | 1.19 | 1.19 | - | - | - | - | +3.5pp | Won |
| Chemnitz +15.5 | 93.1% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +3.5pp | Won |
| Q1: Ludwigsburg +5.5 | 73.3% | 1.33 | 1.33 | - | - | - | - | +3.4pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg +11 | 71.4% | 1.35 | 1.36 | 1.33 | - | - | - | +3.3pp | Lost |
| Ludwigsburg +24.5 | 94.0% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +3.3pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg +12.5 | 85.5% | 1.13 | 1.13 | - | - | - | - | +3.3pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg +20.5 | 89.8% | 1.08 | 1.08 | - | - | - | - | +3.2pp | Won |
| Q1: Chemnitz +5.5 | 82.7% | 1.16 | 1.16 | - | - | - | - | +3.2pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg +12 | 74.1% | 1.29 | 1.31 | 1.27 | - | - | - | +3.2pp | Lost |
| Q1: Chemnitz or Ludwigsburg | 94.2% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +3.0pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg over 63.5 | 95.1% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +2.8pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg +12.5 | 74.8% | 1.28 | 1.30 | 1.27 | 1.26 | - | - | +2.8pp | Lost |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg +8.5 | 74.2% | 1.30 | 1.30 | - | - | - | - | +2.8pp | Won |
| Overtime: no | 95.4% | 1.02 | 1.03 | 1.01 | - | - | - | +2.7pp | Won |
| Q2: Chemnitz or Ludwigsburg | 94.7% | 1.03 | 1.03 | - | - | - | - | +2.7pp | Lost |
| Ludwigsburg over 64.5 | 94.1% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +2.6pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg +15.5 | 81.6% | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.16 | - | - | - | +2.5pp | Lost |
| Q1: Chemnitz over 14.5 | 91.5% | 1.05 | 1.05 | - | - | - | - | +2.5pp | Won |
| Chemnitz over 68.5 | 94.0% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +2.5pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg +10.5 | 80.3% | 1.20 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | +2.5pp | Won |
| Q1: Ludwigsburg +6.5 | 77.7% | 1.23 | 1.23 | - | - | - | - | +2.4pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg over 66.5 | 92.6% | 1.03 | 1.03 | - | - | - | - | +2.4pp | Won |
| Chemnitz +19.5 | 96.0% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +2.3pp | Won |
| 1st half: Chemnitz +6.5 | 81.8% | 1.16 | 1.16 | - | - | - | - | +2.3pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg +11.5 | 72.2% | 1.32 | 1.34 | 1.31 | 1.31 | - | - | +2.3pp | Lost |
| Chemnitz over 67.5 | 95.0% | 1.01 | 1.01 | - | - | - | - | +2.2pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg +13.5 | 77.2% | 1.23 | 1.23 | 1.22 | - | - | - | +2.2pp | Lost |
| 1st half: Chemnitz +8.5 | 87.0% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | +2.0pp | Won |
| Chemnitz +14.5 | 92.1% | 1.03 | 1.03 | - | - | - | - | +1.9pp | Won |
| Q1: Chemnitz +3.5 | 74.7% | 1.27 | 1.27 | - | - | - | - | +1.9pp | Lost |
| Ludwigsburg over 65.5 | 92.9% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +1.7pp | Won |
| Chemnitz over 69.5 | 92.8% | 1.02 | 1.02 | - | - | - | - | +1.7pp | Won |
| Q1: Ludwigsburg over 14.5 | 87.5% | 1.09 | 1.09 | - | - | - | - | +1.5pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg +14.5 | 79.5% | 1.19 | 1.19 | 1.18 | - | - | - | +1.4pp | Lost |
| Ludwigsburg +19.5 | 88.5% | 1.07 | 1.07 | - | - | - | - | +1.4pp | Won |
| 1st half: Chemnitz +4.5 | 76.0% | 1.25 | 1.25 | - | - | - | - | +1.3pp | Lost |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg over 31.5 | 89.5% | 1.06 | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | +1.2pp | Won |
| Q1: Chemnitz +4.5 | 78.7% | 1.20 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | +0.9pp | Lost |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg +11.5 | 83.0% | 1.13 | 1.13 | - | - | - | - | +0.8pp | Won |
| Chemnitz +10.5 | 86.8% | 1.09 | 1.09 | - | - | - | - | +0.8pp | Won |
| 1st half: Chemnitz over 34.5 | 87.6% | 1.07 | 1.07 | - | - | - | - | +0.5pp | Won |
| Chemnitz over 71.5 | 90.0% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +0.4pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg over 67.5 | 90.0% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | +0.4pp | Won |
| Chemnitz +4 | 73.1% | 1.23 | 1.27 | 1.20 | - | - | - | +0.3pp | Won |
| 1st half: Chemnitz +7.5 | 84.6% | 1.11 | 1.11 | - | - | - | - | +0.2pp | Won |
| 1st half: Chemnitz +5.5 | 79.0% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | +0.1pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg +7.5 | 70.9% | 1.31 | 1.31 | - | - | - | - | -0.0pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg over 68.5 | 88.3% | 1.06 | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | -0.0pp | Won |
| Q1: Chemnitz over 16.5 | 83.7% | 1.11 | 1.11 | - | - | - | - | -0.1pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg over 33.5 | 83.7% | 1.11 | 1.11 | - | - | - | - | -0.2pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg over 32.5 | 86.9% | 1.07 | 1.07 | - | - | - | - | -0.3pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg +9.5 | 77.4% | 1.20 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | -0.3pp | Won |
| Q1: Ludwigsburg over 16.5 | 77.4% | 1.20 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | -0.3pp | Won |
| Chemnitz +9.5 | 85.2% | 1.09 | 1.09 | - | - | - | - | -0.9pp | Won |
| Chemnitz +6.5 | 79.0% | 1.15 | 1.15 | - | - | - | - | -1.0pp | Won |
| 1st half: Chemnitz +3.5 | 72.9% | 1.26 | 1.26 | - | - | - | - | -1.2pp | Lost |
| 1st half: Chemnitz over 36.5 | 81.0% | 1.13 | 1.13 | - | - | - | - | -1.3pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg over 34.5 | 79.9% | 1.14 | 1.14 | - | - | - | - | -1.5pp | Won |
| Chemnitz +5.5 | 76.5% | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.16 | - | - | - | -1.5pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg over 69.5 | 86.3% | 1.06 | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | -1.6pp | Won |
| Chemnitz over 73.5 | 86.4% | 1.06 | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | -1.9pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg over 70.5 | 84.2% | 1.09 | 1.09 | - | - | - | - | -1.9pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg over 35.5 | 75.8% | 1.20 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | -2.0pp | Won |
| Chemnitz +4.5 | 73.9% | 1.21 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.19 | - | - | -2.0pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg over 72.5 | 79.3% | 1.14 | 1.14 | - | - | - | - | -2.2pp | Won |
| Over 147.5 | 87.2% | 1.04 | 1.04 | - | - | - | - | -2.4pp | Won |
| Q1: Chemnitz over 18.5 | 72.2% | 1.25 | 1.25 | - | - | - | - | -2.6pp | Lost |
| Q1: Over 37.5 | 72.6% | 1.23 | 1.23 | - | - | - | - | -2.7pp | Won |
| Chemnitz +3.5 | 71.1% | 1.25 | 1.26 | 1.25 | 1.23 | - | - | -2.8pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg over 73.5 | 76.5% | 1.16 | 1.16 | - | - | - | - | -3.0pp | Won |
| Chemnitz +3 | 70.3% | 1.25 | 1.26 | 1.24 | - | - | - | -3.5pp | Won |
| 1st half: Chemnitz over 38.5 | 72.5% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | -3.7pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg over 71.5 | 81.8% | 1.10 | 1.10 | - | - | - | - | -3.7pp | Won |
| Chemnitz over 75.5 | 82.0% | 1.09 | 1.09 | - | - | - | - | -4.1pp | Won |
| 1st half: Ludwigsburg over 36.5 | 71.2% | 1.23 | 1.23 | - | - | - | - | -4.1pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg over 74.5 | 73.5% | 1.20 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | -4.2pp | Won |
| Chemnitz over 77.5 | 76.8% | 1.14 | 1.14 | - | - | - | - | -4.6pp | Won |
| 1st half: Over 76.5 | 74.0% | 1.18 | 1.18 | - | - | - | - | -4.8pp | Won |
| Chemnitz over 78.5 | 73.9% | 1.16 | 1.16 | - | - | - | - | -5.6pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg over 75.5 | 70.4% | 1.22 | 1.22 | - | - | - | - | -5.8pp | Won |
| Over 152.5 | 79.9% | 1.09 | 1.09 | - | - | - | - | -6.2pp | Won |
| Chemnitz over 79.5 | 70.9% | 1.20 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | -6.9pp | Won |
| Over 157.5 | 70.5% | 1.16 | 1.16 | - | - | - | - | -9.0pp | Won |
| Ludwigsburg +13 | 76.7% | 1.23 | 1.23 | - | - | - | - | - | Lost |
| Chemnitz +5 | 75.9% | 1.16 | 1.16 | - | - | - | - | - | Won |
Yesterday's results in full, today's games and market moves worth watching. One post a day, no signup.
| Shot type | Attempts per game | Made per game | Accuracy (made ÷ attempts) | League accuracy | Points per game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏀🏀 2-pointers | 39.3 | 21.8 | 55.6% | 43.6 | |
| 🏀🏀🏀 3-pointers | 30.0 | 9.5 | 33.7% | 28.5 | |
| 🏀 Free throws | 19.3 | 14.9 | 73.4% | 14.9 |
| Shot type | Attempts per game | Made per game | Accuracy (made ÷ attempts) | League accuracy | Points per game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏀🏀 2-pointers | 34.1 | 16.9 | 55.6% | 33.8 | |
| 🏀🏀🏀 3-pointers | 32.0 | 10.8 | 33.7% | 32.4 | |
| 🏀 Free throws | 24.3 | 17.4 | 73.4% | 17.4 |
| Date | Game | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 01/04/26 | Ludwigsburg v Chemnitz | 87-79 |
| 10/10/25 | Chemnitz v Ludwigsburg | 111-88 |
| 01/05/25 | Chemnitz v Ludwigsburg | 104-100 OT |
| 15/12/24 | Ludwigsburg v Chemnitz | 69-65 |
| 27/04/24 | Ludwigsburg v Chemnitz | 96-93 |
| 06/01/24 | Chemnitz v Ludwigsburg | 85-66 |
| 05/05/23 | Ludwigsburg v Chemnitz | 86-79 |
| 08/01/23 | Chemnitz v Ludwigsburg | 89-80 |
| 12/02/22 | Chemnitz v Ludwigsburg | 74-56 |
| 05/11/21 | Ludwigsburg v Chemnitz | 74-76 |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28/10/26 | H | JL Bourg | 96-77 |
| 26/10/26 | A | Wurzburg | 88-98 |
| 21/10/26 | H | Slask Wroclaw | 95-67 |
| 13/10/26 | A | Trento | 88-80 |
| 10/10/26 | H | Bayern | 83-87 |
| 07/10/26 | H | Neptunas | 93-84 |
| 04/10/26 | A | Jena | 76-82 |
| 29/09/26 | A | Tofas | 69-82 |
| 27/09/26 | H | Phoenix Hagen | 94-93 OT |
| 25/09/26 | A | Hamburg | 90-94 OT |
| Date | H/A | Opponent | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24/10/26 | H | Bonn | 84-68 |
| 11/10/26 | A | Basketball Braunschweig | 107-98 OT |
| 04/10/26 | H | Trier | 80-94 |
| 26/09/26 | A | Bamberg | 103-96 |
| 24/09/26 | H | Rostock | 81-78 |
| 20/09/26 | A | Ulm | 77-86 |
| 12/05/26 | A | Rostock | 71-91 |
| 10/05/26 | A | Wurzburg | 58-75 |
| 07/05/26 | H | Bayern | 78-86 |
| 02/05/26 | A | Basketball Braunschweig | 97-98 OT |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | LWLLL | 17% |
| Home | WL | 50% |
| Away | LLLL | 0% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| Win % | 17% | 50% | 0% |
| Points / game | 85.5 | 88.5 | 84.0 |
| Allowed / game | 90.5 | 90.0 | 90.8 |
| Point differential | -5.0 | -1.5 | -6.8 |
| Avg total | 176.0 | 178.5 | 174.8 |
| Over 172 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Win by 10+ | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 33% (3) | 50% (2) | 0% (1) |
| Overtime % | 33% | 50% | 25% |
| Form | Last 5 | Win % |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | WWLWW | 67% |
| Home | WLW | 67% |
| Away | LWW | 67% |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Games | 6 | 3 | 3 |
| Win % | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Points / game | 88.7 | 81.7 | 95.7 |
| Allowed / game | 86.7 | 80.0 | 93.3 |
| Point differential | +2.0 | +1.7 | +2.3 |
| Avg total | 175.3 | 161.7 | 189.0 |
| Over 172 | 50% | 33% | 67% |
| Win by 10+ | 17% | 33% | 0% |
| Close games (≤5 pts) won | 100% (1) | 100% (1) | - |
| Overtime % | 17% | 0% | 33% |
| # | Team | GP | W | L | Win % | PF/g | PA/g | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100% | 99.8 | 70.6 | +29.2 | |
| 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83% | 99.5 | 87.3 | +12.2 | |
| 3 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80% | 90.2 | 84.6 | +5.6 | |
| 4 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 67% | 84.5 | 79.8 | +4.7 | |
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 67% | 82.8 | 80.2 | +2.7 | |
| 6 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 67% | 88.7 | 86.7 | +2.0 | |
| 7 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50% | 92.0 | 84.2 | +7.8 | |
| 8 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50% | 85.3 | 80.8 | +4.5 | |
| 9 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50% | 88.0 | 86.0 | +2.0 | |
| 10 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50% | 89.2 | 94.5 | -5.3 | |
| 11 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50% | 83.3 | 89.2 | -5.8 | |
| 12 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 43% | 81.9 | 84.9 | -3.0 | |
| 13 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 43% | 74.4 | 83.4 | -9.0 | |
| 14 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33% | 76.3 | 88.3 | -12.0 | |
| 15 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 29% | 85.7 | 90.4 | -4.7 | |
| 16 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 29% | 84.4 | 90.9 | -6.4 | |
| 17 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 17% | 85.5 | 90.5 | -5.0 | |
| 18 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 17% | 79.8 | 89.5 | -9.7 |
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 25 | 24 | 27 | 94 | |
| 23 | 25 | 10 | 20 | 78 |
We use cookies to keep the site working, to remember your settings, to understand which predictions people read, and to improve what we show you. For more information, see our Cookie Policy.
Cookies required to use the site and the features you have asked for. They provide the pages, predictions and account functions you requested. These are essential for the operation of our website.
Cookies that remember the preferences and settings from your last visit, so the site behaves the way you left it. They do not tell us who you are and they are not used to build a profile of you.
Cookies used to collect information about your usage of the site. These are used to produce aggregated statistics about visits to our pages. We use these statistics internally to test and improve the site and to give you a better experience. Without them our ability to provide a smoother experience may be degraded.
Cookies used to deliver adverts relevant to you based on your interests. This can include limiting the number of times you see an advert as well as helping us measure the effectiveness of an advert. Without these cookies you will still see adverts, but they will not be adjusted to your interests.